Cambrian explosion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Opabinia made a big contribution to interest in the Cambrian explosion.
This Marrella specimen shows how clear and detailed the fossils are from the Burgess Shale lagerstätte.
An Ediacaran trace fossil, made when an organism burrowed below a microbial mat.
Dickinsonia, an Ediacaran organism of unknown affinity, with a quilted appearance.
A fossilized trilobite. This specimen of Olenoides serratus, from the Burgess shale, preserves 'soft parts' – the antennae and legs.

The Cambrian explosion or Cambrian radiation was the relatively rapid appearance of most major animal phyla around 530 million years ago (mya) in the fossil record.[1][2][3] It is the classic example of megaevolution. By that is not meant a different kind of evolution; rather, it means evolution which produces a tremendous effect. "The fossil record documents two mutually exclusive macroevolutionary modes separated by the transitional Ediacaran period".[4] Since the word 'macroevolution' can apply to modest changes at the species and genus level, 'megaevolution' may be used for really huge changes.

Before about 580 mya it seems that most organisms were simple. They were made of individual cells occasionally organized into colonies. Over the following 70 or 80 million years the rate of evolution accelerated by an order of magnitude.[4] Normally rates of evolution are measured by the extinction and origination rate of species, but here we can say that by the end of the Cambrian every phylum, or almost every phylum, existed.

The diversity of life began to resemble that of today.[5]

The Cambrian explosion has caused much scientific debate. The seemingly rapid appearance of fossils in the 'primordial strata' was noted as early as the mid 19th century,[6] and Charles Darwin saw it as one of the main objections that could be made against his theory of evolution by natural selection.[7]

Key issues[change | edit source]

The long-running puzzlement about the appearance of the Cambrian fauna, seemingly abruptly and from nowhere, centres on three key points:

  1. whether it actually happened. Was there really was a mass diversification of complex organisms over a relatively short period of time during the early Cambrian?
  2. what might have caused such rapid change.
  3. what it might say about the origin and evolution of animals.

Interpretation is difficult due to a limited supply of evidence. The evidence is an incomplete fossil record, and chemical signatures left in Cambrian rocks.

Duration[change | edit source]

The Cambrian explosion started in the Ediacaran from about 575 mya, and continued to the Burgess Shale at about 507 mya. That is about 70 million years. By the end all modern phyla had evolved, and since then no new phyla have appeared in the fossil record. This is one of the things that need to be explained.

Evidence of animals around 1 billion years ago[change | edit source]

For further information, see Acritarch and Stromatolite
Stromatolites (Pika Formation, Middle Cambrian) near Helen Lake, Banff National Park, Canada.
Modern stromatolites in Hamelin Pool Marine Nature Reserve, Western Australia.

Stromatolites, stubby pillars built by colonies of cyanobacteria and other microorganisms, are the first fossils. Their record starts about 3.5 billion years ago, and they were very common from about 2700 mya. They declined steeply after about 1250 mya, and this decline was probably caused by grazing and burrowing animals.[8][9][10]

Precambrian marine diversity was dominated by small fossils known as acritarchs. This term describes almost any small organic walled fossil—from the egg cases of small metazoans to resting cysts of many different kinds of green algae. After appearing around 2000 mya, acritarchs had a boom around 1000 mya, increasing in number, diversity, size, complexity of shape and especially size and number of spines. Their increasingly spiny forms in the last billion years may indicate an increased need for defence against predation. Other groups of small organisms from the Neoproterozoic era also show signs of anti-predator defences.[10] Measuring taxon longevity [11] seems to show an increase in predation around this time.[12] However, in general, the rate of evolution in the Precambrian was very slow, with many cyanobacterial species lasting unchanged for billions of years.[4] Of course, bacteria are defined mainly by their biochemistry, especially their genomes. Changes in their biochemistry would usually leave no trace in the fossil record.

If the predatory organisms which grazed on bacteria and acritarchs really were metazoans, this means that Cambrian animals did not appear "from nowhere" at the base of the Cambrian; their predecessors had existed for hundreds of millions of years.

Other sources[change | edit source]

  • Gould S.J. 1989. Wonderful life: the Burgess Shale and the nature of history. W.W. Norton & Company.
  • Conway Morris S. 1997. The crucible of creation: the Burgess Shale and the rise of animals. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-286202-2.
  • Conway Morris, S. (June 2006). "Darwin’s dilemma: the realities of the Cambrian ‘explosion’". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 361 (1470): 1069–1083. doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.1846. ISSN 0962-8436. PMC 1578734. PMID 16754615. An enjoyable account.

References[change | edit source]

  1. The Cambrian period
  2. The Cambrian explosion – timing
  3. Butterfield N.J. (2001). "Ecology and evolution of Cambrian plankton" (PDF). The ecology of the Cambrian radiation. Columbia University Press, New York. pp. 200–216. ISBN 9780231106139. http://books.google.com/?id=oWcepB3Q-rIC&lpg=PR7&dq=%20The%20Ecology%20of%20the%20Cambrian%20Radiation&pg=PR7#v=onepage&q. Retrieved 2007-08-19.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Butterfield N.J. 2007. Macroevolution and macroecology through deep time. Palaeontology 50 (1): 41. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4983.2006.00613.x.
  5. Bambach R.K.; Bush A.M. & Erwin D.H. (2007). "Autecology and the filling of ecospace: key metazoan radiations". Palæontology 50 (1): 1–22. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4983.2006.00611.x.
  6. Buckland, W. (1841). Geology and mineralogy considered with reference to natural theology. Lea & Blanchard. ISBN 1147868948.
  7. Darwin, (185). On the origin of species by natural selection. Murray, London, United Kingdom. pp. 315–31. ISBN 160206144. OCLC 176630493.
  8. McNamara K.J. (1996). "Dating the origin of animals". Science 274 (5295): 1993–1997. doi:10.1126/science.274.5295.1993f. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/274/5295/1993f. Retrieved 2008-06-28.
  9. Awramik S.M. (1971). "Precambrian columnar stromatolite diversity: Reflection of metazoan appearance" (abstract). Science 174 (4011): 825–827. doi:10.1126/science.174.4011.825. PMID 17759393. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/174/4011/825. Retrieved 2007-12-01.
  10. 10.0 10.1 Bengtson, S. (2002). "Origins and early evolution of predation". In Kowalewski M., and Kelley P.H. (Free full text). The fossil record of predation. The Paleontological Society Papers 8. The Paleontological Society. pp. 289– 317. http://www.nrm.se/download/18.4e32c81078a8d9249800021552/Bengtson2002predation.pdf. Retrieved 2007-12-01.
  11. Taxon longevity = how long a type lasts in the fossil record
  12. Stanley (2008). "Predation defeats competition on the seafloor" (extract). Paleobiology 34 (1): 1. doi:10.1666/07026.1. http://paleobiol.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/content/extract/34/1/1.