Epistemic community

From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Epistemic community is a large network of people who work towards a common knowledge-based goal—like the community of people who work together to create and maintain Wikipedia.[1]

An epistemic community is a group of people who do not have any specific history together. They join to form a kind of community based on a similar focus on an information-based project.

The community group can be made of people with a range of special interests.[2]

This kind of community has four characteristics or typical features:[3]

  1. a shared set of principles or value-based explanations for how the community functions
  2. a shared understanding of the way things happen, including problems and policies and outcomes[4]
  3. shared ideas about what is acceptable or valid according to specially defined ideas and evaluation practices
  4. a common enterprise or shared goals[5]

The shared explanations for how the community functions includes "the appalling silence of good people",[6] which encourages the growth of perverse incentives.

An example of a scientific epistemic community is the 1975 Mediterranean Action Plan (MAP). This is a marine pollution control regime for the Mediterranean Sea developed by the United Nations.[7]

Related pages[change | change source]

References[change | change source]

  1. Waldman, Simon. "Who knows?" The Guardian (UK). October 26, 2004; excerpt, "The site is manned by volunteers, and now owned by a foundation, which means people willingly give their time and intellectual property to the venture.... There are hundreds of thousands of "Wikipedians" who have contributed or edited articles."
  2. Haas, P. (1990). "Obtaining international environmental protection through epistemic consensus," Millennium Journal of International Studies 19:3, 347-363.
  3. Haas, P. (1992). "Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination," International Organization 46:1, 1-35.
  4. Compare P. B. de Laat, (2012) "Coercion or empowerment? Moderation of content in Wikipedia as 'essentially contested' bureaucratic rules."[permanent dead link] Ethics and Information Technology, pp. 1–13; retrieved 2013-1-25.
  5. Compare K. Brad Wray, "The Epistemic Cultures of Science and Wikipedia: A Comparison," 'Episteme, Vol. 6, Issue 1, February 2009, pp. 38-51; retrieved 2012-1-25.
  6. Axelrod, Rise B. and Charles R. Cooper (2011). Axelrod & Cooper's Concise Guide to Writing, p. 333; Ansbro, John J. (2000). Martin Luther King, Jr.: Nonviolent Strategies and Tactics for Social Change, p. 227.
  7. Haas, P. (1989) "Do regimes matter? Epistemic communities and Mediterranean pollution control," International Organization, 43:3, 377-403.

Other websites[change | change source]