Talk:Ancient Australia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Explaining a change[change source]

I will take out the reference to 70K years ago because the sources are not appropriate for such a claim. One individual member of a team made the claim, and not in a refereed source. That is not proper scientific practice. The 50K year claim is well sourced, and should stay. Another source is a dead link. We need to be careful not to present speculation as fact. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:38, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]