Talk:Conservatism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

On replacing Nosources[change source]

I replaced the Template:Nosource and moved the attempted source here.

From [[Wikipedia:Citing_sources}}

On the article page, you should list in numerical order where the facts come from in a section called "References".
If you use citations inside the article paragraphs (this is preferred), then you need to set up the article references section


The added source is not attached to any of the facts asserted in the article, but just added at the end. It is impossible to tell what the reference is in support of unless it is just the last sentence. Also, it combines two sources into one. Each should be listed separately. Inaccurate or misleading sources may confuse, so I have moved them here. I do not have access to the sources, so I cannot clean them up myself.

Copy of the moved source:

↑ Phillips, R. S. and others. 1983. Conservatism and Enlightenment, Age of. Funk & Wagnalls New Encyclopedia: Volume 7, pp. 141 – 143; Volume 9, pp. 302 – 303. USA: R. R. Donnelley & Sons Company. ISBN: 0-8343-0051-6

Thanks, Ted (talk) 01:45, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dolphins[change source]

Dolphins have wings and they fly into the sun set when people dream--69.85.227.118 (talk) 16:23, 20 January 2017 (UTC)"Dolphins are the unicorns of the sea"[reply]

Unsourced rubbish...[change source]

... and you can judge this because it has no relevant sources. It does not even mention the country which has the longest rule by Conservative governments, namely the U.K. Macdonald-ross (talk) 14:51, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]