Talk:Uncyclopedia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I just noticed that the section saying that articles on Uncyclopedia may offend people. Is this breaching the Neutral Point Of View rule?

Offence[change source]

This article says Uncyclopedia can offend people. Who would it cause offence to? The weak of heart? j. rand|talk| ε contribs|email 03:30, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if you've been there,you could see the way the community is there. It's like living in, oh, I don't know, but it is not for kids, no way, that's for sure. It is a site of seemingly careless and "violent" people...they just go crazy over there! That's me...Let's talk.00:46, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
See for yourself:[1] Noelle 20:17, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, it would have to be referencing the weak of heart. Anyone who is offended by a parody is extremely weak of heart. In fact, they're so weak of heart, the weakness has leaked into other places, like the brain. Furthermore, the weakness of brain has become so extreme that they have joined, or perhaps have always been a part of, a fairly well-known cult known as the cretinists. Some of the more sophisticated ones have joined Intelligent design.--69.91.95.139 (talk) 01:46, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have readded more info. See for yourself. An article on a harmles (but stupid) tv show for little kids. Sad sad sad. And all the "penis" references... bbbbbbbbbbllllllllllllaaaaaaaahhhh!!!!!!!!!!! 65.0.170.189 (talk) 02:14, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It's no longer a stub. And has more info about this. 65.0.181.143 (talk) 15:38, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Your edit has been undone. You can not simply copy and paste from the English Wikipedia. It is a violation of GFDL and copyright law. To learn how to do it correctly read these instructions. fr33kman talk 15:44, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Is it better now? 65.0.181.143 (talk) 15:51, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the copyvio, unsimplified content. Rockskeeper (talk) 16:01, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Alright...so it says here that Uncyclopedia is a dangerous place for children, filled with necrophilia and penis jokes (which it totally isn't), yet, Encyclopedia Dramatica is a cesspool filled with the most disgusting porn you can think of, yet it doesn't say much on it's article. Can someone switch this around please? --TangoFett (talk) 01:15, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The idea that Uncyclopedia is a joke wiki is a fact. The aim of the wiki is to joke around and have fun. See this page as an example. IWI (chat) 08:52, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The previous revision of the page was utterly without citations, now, we can maybe add Uncyclopedia's Oscar Wilde article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.67.78.115 (talkcontribs) 08:56, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User was blocked due to block evasion, although it's worth noting here that I have added citations for the claim in question. IWI (chat) 11:10, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unsouced Quotes[change source]

On the article there is a passage using quotes in statements, these statements are unsourced, could anyone add any sources? 79.67.78.175 (talk) 13:23, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I already cited the uncited claims. IWI (chat) 13:29, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please add citations for the quotes "the content-free encyclopedia" and the "fake Wikipedia". Thank You. 79.67.78.27 (talk) 08:17, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Didn't take a lot of effort, did it? 79.67.71.49 (talk) 12:58, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

General Note[change source]

Please, remove the semi-protection on the article, maybe I've slipped up in the past, but I want to start afresh, I haven't made an account in months, please, let me at least make this wiki better. Regards, 92.0.194.114 (talk) 09:11, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]