Transport Layer Security
|The TCP/IP model (RFC 1122)|
||The English used in this article may not be easy for everybody to understand. (June 2012)|
||This article does not have any sources. (April 2009)|
Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol and its predecessor, Secure Sockets Layer (SSL), are cryptographic protocols that provide security and data integrity for communications over TCP/IP networks such as the Internet. Several versions of the protocols are common in applications such as web browsing, electronic mail, Internet faxing, instant messaging and voice-over-IP (VoIP).
Description[change | edit source]
The TLS protocol allows applications to communicate across a network in a way designed to prevent eavesdropping, tampering, and message forgery. TLS provides endpoint authentication and communications confidentiality over the Internet using cryptography. Most of the time, only the server is authenticated (i.e., its identity is ensured) while the client remains unauthenticated; this means that the end user (whether an individual or an application, such as a Web browser) can be sure with whom it is communicating. The next level of security is known as mutual authentication. Mutual authentication requires public key infrastructure (PKI) deployment to clients unless TLS-PSK or the Secure Remote Password (SRP) protocol are used, which provide strong mutual authentication without needing to deploy a PKI.
Usage[change | edit source]
SSL and TLS have been widely used in several open source software projects. Programmers may use the OpenSSL, NSS, or GnuTLS libraries for SSL/TLS functionality. Microsoft Windows includes a usage of SSL and TLS as part of its Secure Channel package. Delphi programmers may use a library called Indy.
Standards[change | edit source]
The current approved version is 1.2, which is specified in:
- RFC 5246: “The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2”.
The current standard obsoletes these former versions:
- RFC 2246: “The TLS Protocol Version 1.0”.
- RFC 4346: “The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.1”.
Other RFCs subsequently extended TLS, including:
- RFC 2595: “Using TLS with IMAP, POP3 and ACAP”. Specifies an extension to the IMAP, POP3 and ACAP services that allow the server and client to use transport-layer security to provide private, authenticated communication over the Internet.
- RFC 2712: “Addition of Kerberos Cipher Suites to Transport Layer Security (TLS)”. The 40-bit ciphersuites defined in this memo appear only for the purpose of documenting the fact that those ciphersuite codes have already been assigned.
- RFC 2817: “Upgrading to TLS Within HTTP/1.1”, explains how to use the Upgrade mechanism in HTTP/1.1 to initiate Transport Layer Security (TLS) over an existing TCP connection. This allows unsecured and secured HTTP traffic to share the same well known port (in this case, http: at 80 rather than https: at 443).
- RFC 2818: “HTTP Over TLS”, distinguishes secured traffic from insecure traffic by the use of a different 'server port'.
- RFC 3207: “SMTP Service Extension for Secure SMTP over Transport Layer Security”. Specifies an extension to the SMTP service that allows an SMTP server and client to use transport-layer security to provide private, authenticated communication over the Internet.
- RFC 3268: “AES Ciphersuites for TLS”. Adds Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) ciphersuites to the previously existing symmetric ciphers.
- RFC 3546: “Transport Layer Security (TLS) Extensions”, adds a mechanism for negotiating protocol extensions during session initialisation and defines some extensions. Made obsolete by RFC 4366.
- RFC 3749: “Transport Layer Security Protocol Compression Methods”, specifies the framework for compression methods and the DEFLATE compression method.
- RFC 3943: “Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Compression Using Lempel-Ziv-Stac (LZS)”.
- RFC 4132: “Addition of Camellia Cipher Suites to Transport Layer Security (TLS)”.
- RFC 4162: “Addition of SEED Cipher Suites to Transport Layer Security (TLS)”.
- RFC 4217: “Securing FTP with TLS”.
- RFC 4279: “Pre-Shared Key Ciphersuites for Transport Layer Security (TLS)”, adds three sets of new ciphersuites for the TLS protocol to support authentication based on pre-shared keys.
- RFC 4347: “Datagram Transport Layer Security” specifies a TLS variant that works over datagram protocols (such as UDP).
- RFC 4366: “Transport Layer Security (TLS) Extensions” describes both a set of specific extensions, and a generic extension mechanism.
- RFC 4492: “Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) Cipher Suites for Transport Layer Security (TLS)”.
- RFC 4507: “Transport Layer Security (TLS) Session Resumption without Server-Side State”.
- RFC 4680: “TLS Handshake Message for Supplemental Data”.
- RFC 4681: “TLS User Mapping Extension”.
- RFC 4785: “Pre-Shared Key (PSK) Ciphersuites with NULL Encryption for Transport Layer Security (TLS)”.
Other pages[change | edit source]
- Certificate authority
- Public key certificate
- Extended Validation Certificate
- SSL acceleration
- Datagram Transport Layer Security
- Multiplexed Transport Layer Security
- Virtual private network
- Server gated cryptography
Software[change | edit source]
- OpenSSL: a free (and very popular) implementation (BSD license with some extensions)
- GnuTLS: a free LGPL licensed implementation
- JSSE: a Java implementation included in the Java Runtime Environment
- Network Security Services (NSS): FIPS 140 validated open source library
Further reading[change | edit source]
- Wagner, David; Schneier, Bruce (November 1996). "Analysis of the SSL 3.0 Protocol". The Second USENIX Workshop on Electronic Commerce Proceedings USENIX Press.
- Eric Rescorla. SSL and TLS: Designing and Building Secure Systems. United States: Addison-Wesley Pub Co. ISBN 0-201-61598-3.
- Stephen A. Thomas (2000). SSL and TLS essentials securing the Web. New York: Wiley. ISBN 0-471-38354-6.
- Bard, Gregory (2006). "A Challenging But Feasible Blockwise-Adaptive Chosen-Plaintext Attack On Ssl". International Association for Cryptologic Research (136). http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/bard04vulnerability.html. Retrieved 2007-04-20.
- Canvel, Brice. "Password Interception in a SSL/TLS Channel". http://lasecwww.epfl.ch/memo/memo_ssl.shtml. Retrieved 2007-04-20.