User talk:Aleksa Lukic

This recently blocked user's talk page has been blanked of all non-essential discussions.

{{{2}}}

Indef block

You have been blocked indefinitely from changing Wikipedia in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of changing privileges. If you believe this block is unfair you may request to be unblocked by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. You may want to consider reading our guide to unblock requests before requesting to be unblocked.

fr33kman ^talk 14:54, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason.

Request reason: "Please check those articles:

Dzhe; Vuk Karadžić; Pioneer; .rs; Lje; Digraph (orthography); Nje; Politika;Bože Pravde; Mitrovica; Troll; Mačvanska Mitrovica; Troll (movie); Troll 2; Boris Tadić; .gu; Country code top-level domain; Troll 3; Bouvet Island; Åland Islands; Democratic Party (Serbia)); Federal Republic of Yugoslavia; Vladislav F. Ribnikar; Agranulocytosis; Icosagon; Generic top-level domain; Travian; Browser game; President of Serbia;Animated cartoon; Madagascar (disambiguation); Sakhalin; Dragon (Yu-Gi-Oh!); Type of monster in Yu-Gi-Oh!; Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia; Grand Theft Auto IV; Dje; Serbian Cyrillic alphabet; .ac; .ad; .ae; .af; .ag; .ai; .al; .am; .an; .ao; .aq; .ar; .as; .at; Country code; .au; .aw; Real analysis; .ax; .az; Tranquillisers.

But, no chance, I am to bad."

Decline reason: "See the reason in the block log. You created after warnings copyright violations. No reason to unblock you. -- Barras (talk) 20:48, 26 May 2009 (UTC)"

Not to mention some extremely vile comments to an editor here; and no, I don't care that you apologized for them. You're banned, period! fr33kman ^talk 20:50, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

For example: ???--AleksA ツ 20:52, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

+ I would like to request from any administrator to delete all of my contributions (all pages that I created, you can see it above), because there are not threat as useful here. Thank you, --AleksA ツ 20:54, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

• You posted your (not copyright violation) under GFDL. There is no reason to delete them. Now EOD, please. Barras (talk) 20:56, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

* * Oh, yes of course it is: Author wants deletion. --AleksA ツ 20:58, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

But others edit these pages too, so you aren't the only author. please stop now. Otherwise, I change the block settings to cannot edit own talk page. Thanks Barras (talk) 21:00, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Barras, is correct. Once you release under GFDL you have no legal right to ask for their removal. I have changed your block settings so that you can not edit your talk page now. I'd advise you not to harras people by email either or that too will be disabled. fr33kman ^talk 21:04, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Talk page unblocked

I've unblocked your talk page so that you can discuss your block here. Note: you are on a one-strike rule. Any attack will lead to your account being permanently blocked with all privileges disabled. As for your block on all other pages, I believe it is justified and see no reason to unblock you from editing the Simple English Wikipedia. You have broken many of our rules and your edits have been of very low quality. There is a Wikipedia in your own language. I suggest you create an account there. EhJJ^TALK 16:54, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason.

Request reason: "After I have carefully studied my changes, and take a Wiki break I am giving to Wikipedia team my final unblock report:

I have been blocked in April 15th for personal attack to EhJJ who is, by the way great user, and then I was promissed that I will never repeat same bad things again. I have proved my promisse and I spend a lot of effort to be decent to other uses and I was never copied the entire of en. article to Simple (replace content). I have spent lot of time to help our project and created mass of articles and reverted some vandalism (minor of vandalism actually not was vandalism, how I can't see at that time quickly). Then I was some copyrights vailations (I know that is serious things, but I have wish to help). For my last change in mainspace (http://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jack_Russell_Terrier&diff=prev&oldid=1556485), I have earned a block (on 25th May). I was very confused in first moment, because coping some parts of text with some grammar and Wiki repair is allowed on sr. project (I have found the link which can be very helpful for me, and which no adminstrator has given to me: http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyrights).

I know it is hard to belive me getting in view my first block... But there's only one honest true: If administration unblock me, I'll try to make a little bit less changes in mainspace (except rv real vandalism), I will try to repair for that time my low-quaitly articles, learning the language in the same time). When my en. level grow enough high I will start to creating more articles). Otherwise, (if I make any, was a minor mistake), following my behavior, administrators can very easy re-block me.

+Changes under my IP address (79.101.68.26 can prove that I can give useful contributions to Wikipedia."

Decline reason: "you tried to come back with a sock puppet and started by voting on an RfA. The sockpuppet is confirmed: Wikipedia:RfCU#Aleksa_Lukic_and_Masha_Ashner. No reason for an unblock. -- Barras (talk) 16:45, 3 July 2009 (UTC)"

And what of your sockpuppetry? Pmlineditor 16:42, 3 July 2009 (UTC)