User talk:Auntof6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Ephebophilia incorrect introduction[change source]

Hi, the introduction to the article Ephebophilia, the part that cannot be edited in any way by common users, indicates it as a "paraphilia characterized by sexual attraction to adolescents aged from 15-18". Ephebophilia is not classified as a paraphilia but more of a sexual preference, one of chronophilic kind. Plus, the given range is 15-19, not 15-18. Could you correct it please? Thank you. 151.44.70.104 (talk) 13:21, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to the page's metadata, you should be able to make the change yourself, if you provide reliable sources to support it. (talk page stalker) Justarandomamerican (tc) 13:25, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But I can't, it's the very brief description right below the title. 151.46.59.58 (talk) 13:32, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah. You may make the change here: https://wikidata.org/wiki/Q595012 Justarandomamerican (tc) 13:38, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks 👍👍 151.46.59.58 (talk) 13:52, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speaking about sources, as you can see, ephebophilia is not classified as a paraphilia: https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/291419-overview?form=fpf#a1
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32119312/#:~:text=A%20total%20of%20eight%20Paraphilias,%2C%20fetishism%2C%20and%20transvestic%20fetishism.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1359178912000845
https://courses.lumenlearning.com/wm-abnormalpsych/chapter/paraphilic-disorders/
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/conditions/paraphilias?amp
https://www.medicinenet.com/paraphilia/article.htm
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/conditions/paraphilias
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3769077/ 151.46.59.58 (talk) 13:49, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Xenia (article). I forgot to say "thanks", at the end of the previous discussion. Thanks a lot. 2001:2020:313:EBE1:FD03:DA0D:1462:F44 (talk) 20:09, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If I am not mistaken[change source]

Did you not just delete a lot of redirects to non-existent articles? This IP is doing the same thing and has 3 warnings already today. 82.23.107.184. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 20:56, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PotsdamLamb: Yes, I did. I'll take care of these, too. Thanks for the heads-up. -- Auntof6 (talk) 01:28, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think Fehu took care of them as he blocked the IP for a year knowing who it is. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 01:30, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@PotsdamLamb: And let me remind you: the "only" warnings are not meant to be used when there after other warnings. The word "only" means that there aren't any others, so using it when there are others doesn't make sense. -- Auntof6 (talk) 01:30, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In re please? Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 01:31, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@PotsdamLamb: This warning you left for the IP we're discussing. -- Auntof6 (talk) 01:32, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I did that due to the time and the difference in what they were doing. A lot of users have warnings, but the template says only, and I felt that the 50 or so pages they were creating before I could get an admin/sysop to block them were worth it instead of using the final warning. The idea was to tell them they will be blocked, whereas the other templates at 1, 2, and 3 say they may be blocked. We only have two options, and going in order would have defeated my purpose of trying to get them to stop. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 01:38, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambig's[change source]

Have you tried this script by chance? w:User:Qwertyytrewqqwerty/DisamAssist.js Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 02:25, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PotsdamLamb: I don't think so. What does it do? -- Auntof6 (talk) 02:28, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry should have included the doc User:Qwertyytrewqqwerty/DisamAssist Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 02:29, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@PotsdamLamb: Thanks. I might look at it sometime when I want to do a significant amount of disambiguating. -- Auntof6 (talk) 02:35, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. It looks like the website you used to use would need to become a tool and be run by a bot. I could develop it as the script is premade, I would just need to figure it out and figure out how this entire topic works with what has to be done and such. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 02:49, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template deletion[change source]

Hi - Template:Infobox Law enforcement agency is no longer needed. The couple of articles that directed there then to the same but with a lower case law have been changed to go directly to the correct template. That is why I marked this one for QD as it is no longer needed. It’s an empty redirect. I guess the valid reason is housekeeping? Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 18:32, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PotsdamLamb: I wouldn't call that housekeeping. As annoying as it might be, I think this one has to go to RFD. But I don't think it would hurt to keep it -- redirects are cheap, and we might not be using it now but someone might link to it in the future. -- Auntof6 (talk) 18:34, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It’s actually a T2. I set it again as such. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 18:37, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for that. I must have missed that one when I was doing the cleanup. I will go back through them and fix any I missed so you do not have too. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 02:42, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PotsdamLamb: I just did the three that showed up as uncategorized. The "needing to be simplified" ones are a little tricky because you have to specify extra parameters. I usually just copy/paste from an existing one and change as needed. -- Auntof6 (talk) 02:43, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh ok. Thank you for that. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 02:44, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The spelling of division is not correct. Are you sure it should be a redirect? MathXplore (talk) 08:33, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you correct the spelling with suppress-redirect? Thank you for your attention. MathXplore (talk) 02:29, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@MathXplore: I see that the template has been deleted. -- Auntof6 (talk) 21:50, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mesereaulaw kept removing the deletion request on the Hennessy Carolina until they were blocked. Now Brooklynqueen03 keeps removing the deletion request despite warning the user so may times. Is there anyway it could be protected? Shoot for the Stars (talk) 02:34, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Shoot for the Stars: I see that it has been protected. -- Auntof6 (talk) 21:50, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Red link cats[change source]

Do we have a special page (similar to wanted pages or templates) that shows red linked categories? So there are only 2 pages in a cat and so it hasn’t been published yet since it needs 3 pages or more? Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 09:35, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PotsdamLamb: Special:WantedCategories.
Just keep in mind that, as with all the "wanted" special pages, it just means that it has been used somewhere without being created. It doesn't necessarily mean that it should be created here. A lot of those appear on the list because people have copied from enwiki; it's possible that it's either a category we don't use here on purpose, or that it should have a different name here, or that there's some other reason for not creating it. Just give it some thought before creating. -- Auntof6 (talk) 21:20, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the information and link. I asked because I see an IP editor who has been making a ton of new categories over the past couple of days and as soon as it hits 3 they activate the category. I didn’t know if we had one but if I see one previously deleted that got re-created I’ll understand why and ask you questions since that is your niche. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 21:24, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Roy Van der Veen[change source]

This article was created by an account who put it on different wikis of which all deleted them (including here) for it being in another language and being non-notable. The picture they used was also deleted from commons due to copyright. There is no discussion to be had. User was notified of the QD of the article, removed the QD, posted it to the board and then I restored the QD tag and warned them and they acknowledged they cannot delete the QD (by thanking me for warning.) They put the request up on the board as soon as the QD tag was put on without putting wait on it. It was deleted quite a bit later and they made no attempt to fix the article, instead they went on other wikis and tried to save it which was unsuccessful. Also their username is basically this persons name backwards. That is why I moved it. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 03:20, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]