Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines

1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines

B. Carry out these checks

1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lede.

C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted

1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.

D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability

1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion

Put the deletion tag on the article.

1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
   • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
3. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
   • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.

Create a discussion page.

1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
   • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
3. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
   • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
   • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.

List it here

1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:

   {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2020/(name of page to be deleted)}}

4. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

If this is too complicated for you, there are some gadgets like Twinkle that you can use. This allows you to do it faster.

Quick deletion

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion policy § Quick deletion

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion review

• The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
• Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
• Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
• Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
• New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
• Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) will not be counted.
• Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete Quick keep".
• If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
• Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.
• Requests for deletion is not a war zone. You can click here for more information, although the page is not in Simple English.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.

• All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions

Template:EpList5

Template:EpList5 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unused template A1Cafel (talk) 11:44, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Just like the other one, I don't see any possible use for this template.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 20:04, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 11:44, 30 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Template:Eplist5

Template:Eplist5 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unused template A1Cafel (talk) 11:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete per nom. Plus, I don't see any possible use for it.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 20:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 11:43, 30 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Franco-German enmity

Franco-German enmity (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kk.urban has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Complex. Probably AI-generated. Kk.urban (talk) 20:50, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Keep, I think. Needs to be simplified but it is this subject from the English Wikipedia. Cleo Cooper (talk) 06:39, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:50, 29 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

JCRD Buildérs

JCRD Buildérs (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kk.urban has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: May not meet WP:GNG or en:WP:NCORP. Coverage is almost all promotional. Kk.urban (talk) 20:44, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:44, 29 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Privay Cee

Privay Cee (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails GNG --Ferien (talk) 20:13, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Wikialpha is a copy of Wikipedia and a place to publish PR/Spam/Garbage, with other references being self-generated sources. However, this isn't sufficient to claim notability, as it fails WP:GNG. DIVINE 20:31, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
• Have you made your research before nominating speedy deletion to an article a user took time to write and edit, you can google search about the subject and improve the article rather than to delete it. the subject is notable to nigerian and also it is a requested article by it readers. The subject have a google knowledge panel which have been made reference in the article. pls i suggest this article should not be deleted Praytt (talk) 20:34, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

  Praytt, have you got the sources to prove notability? I've researched online and I've found pretty much nothing. --Ferien (talk) 21:12, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

• Delete. The only sources are non-reliable blogs or database entries, none of which are reliable. Cleo Cooper (talk) 00:54, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:13, 29 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Debabrata Chatterjee

Debabrata Chatterjee (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk) 20:00, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete The news featured them all is only about spending 4,029 USD to buy books, resembling a press release, with references 1, 2, 3, and 7. The Indian Express article, written by an intern, discusses his book collection and his plan to build a library, which has not been constructed yet. He was honored, but the reason remains unclear as I cannot access the full article. The subject evidently does not meet WP:GNG. DIVINE 20:25, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete Wonderful heart-warming slice of life, but the sourcing is meh, especially with the only good source being done by an intern. The source for the award has a passing mention of the subject, no mention of any award (see [1]). Add in a single-edit creator of a fully fleshed out and sourced article, and there's a smell of UPE here. Ravensfire (talk) 03:08, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
• Weak delete. Perhaps notable for one event. Cleo Cooper (talk) 18:16, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:00, 29 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Template:Tropical cyclone season effects

Template:Tropical cyclone season effects (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Pppery has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unused, broken template. Also Template:Tropical cyclone season effects (cyclone) and Module:Tropical cyclone season effects * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:33, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete agreed. --A1Cafel (talk) 11:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 01:33, 29 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Template:Australian cyclone season effects (cyclone)

Template:Australian cyclone season effects (cyclone) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Pppery has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unused, broken template * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:30, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete agreed. --A1Cafel (talk) 11:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 01:30, 29 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

California Circle and Dixon Landing Road Intersection

California Circle and Dixon Landing Road Intersection (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not a notable intersection --Ferien (talk) 20:09, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:39, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:09, 28 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Voiced dental and alveolar taps and flaps

Voiced dental and alveolar taps and flaps (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

PotsdamLamb has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Per a conversation with Eptalon and after looking it at, neither of us know if this can really be simplified and we both agreed no one will search the title of this article. There are other issues within the article but is it too advanced to be on simple wiki or something else that can be done? Looking forward to the input from the community. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 07:17, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 07:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Bandhu Social Welfare Society

Bandhu Social Welfare Society (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This is a society in Bangladesh that cares for those who are poor, focusing on gender-diverse people (and probably homosexuals). The society has a web-presence which is also in English. This was originally nominated as QD G5 (created by blocked/banned user), but I'd prefer a community discussion. I am aware that identifying as homosexual or gender-diverse may be an issue in Asia, but I am unclear as to whether this entry meets our inclusion criteria. So, dear community, what do you think? Eptalon (talk) 06:41, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

It needs references, but Google seems to find 44 - and that is just in English language media. Rathfelder (talk) 21:40, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete: Doesn't meet WP:GNG.–TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 10:21, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 06:41, 28 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Renmar-Arnejo

Renmar-Arnejo (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A very similar page was deleted (QD) about a week ago. Rather than quick-deleting this again, I'd like to start a community discussion: We are talking about a dollmaker from the Philippines, born 1999. The text seems to have been based on/copied from another project, where it is released under a creative-commons license. We get no references, in what way this person in his early 20s is notable. Looks like, person trained on a job is doing his job, to me. So dear community, what do you think? Eptalon (talk) 06:34, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete No real sources and nothing that really shows this is a notable person. Basic family details, basic education details, some on outside interest, but nothing beyond they have a social media presence. That's not enough to show WP:GNG is met. Probably a very nice person, but not one we should have an article about. Ravensfire (talk) 03:19, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
• Delete. No sources and thus a lot of original research or an autobiography. As a social media personality, they have only 23 subscribers, suggesting there is a lack of a claim to notability, unfortunately. Cleo Cooper (talk) 18:19, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 06:34, 28 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Keengar Society

Keengar Society (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This looks like a society that might be notable. The only reference I found is en:Timeline of South Asian and diasporic LGBT history. Searching on Google, SEWP turns up as being the first hit. This was proposed for quick-deletion (G5-created by blocked or banned user), but I'd prefer a community discussion. It might be that this society, created in 2009, has since ceased to exist (or merged with another one), or it might be that they still do, but that with that search term, they can't be found. If kept, the page should include a link to the society's web page (even if it's not in Eglish). So, dear community, what do you think? Eptalon (talk) 06:12, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete as the editor who nominated it; I cannot find anything on this. I fixed the ref error from when brought over from ENWP and it’s a link to Flickr with hand drawings. I feel that because there isn’t anything much in searching it doesn’t meet the requirements. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 06:21, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 06:12, 28 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Fremont Nebraska

Fremont Nebraska (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kk.urban has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I believe that multinational companies are often notable, but I can't seem to find any sources about this company in particular. Kk.urban (talk) 19:39, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 19:39, 27 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Matthew Maschler

Matthew Maschler (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

TDKR Chicago 101 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Cannot see the notability behind this article. It appears like a resume/promotional article. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 21:41, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete The magic WP:Before says we have been seeing more of these lately. Wondering if we have a spam farm running around. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 09:50, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Marion Raven

Marion Raven (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

RiggedMint has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Copy/pasted from enwiki RiggedMint 18:16, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Comment: @Fr33kman: I know it isn't complex or housekeeping, but the article is literally copied straight up from enwiki (see intro from the enwiki and compare it). It has little editing done to it. RiggedMint 18:20, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

• Yeah, but that's not covered by QD, unfortunately :) fr33kman 18:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

• Does this not count? RiggedMint 18:25, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

• Infact, you can also see complex words that aren't simple (e.g. ceased, titled, debut). Is there a new guideline stating copy/pasted entries from enwiki do not count as A3 anymore? RiggedMint 18:28, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

• With respect, this is only a paragraph, would it not be simpler to just simplify it? Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:10, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

  I would, but the creator of this article keeps pumping out copy/pasted articles, created around 10 articles. RiggedMint 19:19, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

  I have simplified it. If there is still something missing, please fix it. Thank you. DIVINE 19:27, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

  I would definitely switch out the image for an infobox, put in a few more links and sources, and it would be good to go. RiggedMint 19:29, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

  I have completed the task and believe that everything is good now. DIVINE 19:31, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

  Then AfD isn't going to help you. If it's an editor's behaviour that is the issue, report to WP:AN. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:48, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep It has been simplified, so happy to keep now. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 12:47, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
• It is technically an A3, but is only an intro and seems to have been mostly fixed, so no reason to delete anymore. --Ferien (talk) 12:27, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep Everything is fine now so let’s keep it. DIVINE 15:16, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:16, 25 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Dr. Rabbit

Dr. Rabbit (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

FatalFit has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn’t seem notable enough to have it’s own article, I can’t find anything online other than a Know Your Meme page. FatalFit | ✉ | ✓  22:21, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Although technically this could have been QD’d. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 09:53, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:21, 24 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Muhammad Minhaj Uddin

Muhammad Minhaj Uddin (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

RiggedMint has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG. RiggedMint 18:12, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

All the references contained in the article are independent sources for the person and covered by notable news media such as Kaler Kantho (1)and Dhaka Post (2).

In what logical context do you think that it does not meet the notability? Rayhan.author (talk) 19:02, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

There seem to be sufficient references. Rathfelder (talk) 20:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Same as nom. No notablility and seeing many of these articles coming from various editors with no edits prior is inviting a CU. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 09:55, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

• Keep Wikipedia is open to everyone and anyone has the right to edit and create new articles whenever they want. The references mentioned in this article are from prominent national newspapers and the subject of the person's khatib in another country expresses a pride for his own country. Also reading the source gives a good insight into his research and contributions and has done to make him prominent. Mafmes (talk) 17:28, 21 April 2024 (UTC) This user has made few or no contributions outside of this page. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 21:05, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

  There are 6 independent references. That should be enough to establish notability. Rathfelder (talk) 21:43, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

National Democratic Party (Brunei)

National Democratic Party (Brunei) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kk.urban has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I can find no sources about this party and I think it may be a hoax. Much of this article is copied from en:Cambodian People's Party, which is about a different party in a different country. Kk.urban (talk) 23:05, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Merge: Based on Brittanica, it did exist for a for a few years before it was banned. It was with another party, the Brunei National United Party, and you can read the rest of it. As far a hoax, I think it is not one, however, if it is a copy/paste from Cambodia wiki, then that is an issue. So, since I am saying merge, I think it would be better served on the Brunei page since it covers the country. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 23:20, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

  @PotsdamLamb This could be helpful if the correct information was included in the article, but currently the content of our article contradicts the Britannica article. If you (or someone else) wants to fix this, then it might be good to merge into Brunei, but adding false information there won't be helpful, and just redirecting to Brunei won't be useful if Brunei doesn't mention this party. Kk.urban (talk) 23:25, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

  @Kk.urban Yeah I agree with you. If someone wants to do it, this particular article will not stand on it's own due to lack of information, so I think it will be best served as deleted and someone (not me as I do not do politics) wants to put it in the main article, I am ok with that as well. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 23:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

  It doesnt make sense as it is. Says it started in 2020 and then talks about the Cold War. Rathfelder (talk) 20:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

  @Rathfelder Yeah it may just be a matter of deletion or if someone just wants to correct all of it. Nothing makes sense from what I can find vs. the article. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 20:18, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

References

This request is due to close on 23:05, 23 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at an administrator's discretion.

Recently closed deletion discussions

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 03:37, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Ameer Vayalar

Ameer Vayalar (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Proposed for deletion in August 2021, see RfD.Before simply quick-deleting, I think we should discuss again; that RfD was 2.5 years ago. So... Eptalon (talk) 19:18, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete G4, cross-wiki spam.Tehonk (talk) 19:46, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Too Soon to be on Wikipedia. DIVINE 19:51, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete per Tehonk. The article is nothing more than spam. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 04:50, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:18, 20 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 03:36, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Alexia Umansky

Alexia Umansky (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Shoot for the Stars has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not a notable individual. Fails GNG. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 17:26, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete She had one important role in one movie, and that is it. She has not made any well-known contributions, to my knowledge. Not notable as per WP:GNG. – Angerxiety^!

This request is due to close on 17:26, 19 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. Redirected. --Auntof6 (talk) 03:34, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Gastrodon

Gastrodon (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

QuicoleJR has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not a notable Pokémon. The English Wikipedia currently does not have an article about it. QuicoleJR (talk) 15:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• The absence of an English Wikipedia article is not a good reason for deletion. Rathfelder (talk) 22:12, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

@Rathfelder: I know that, but there is no indication that this Pokémon is any more notable than the 800 others. QuicoleJR (talk) 01:17, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

• Keep/Redirect to List of Pokémon While I believe I have included some credible and relevant sources, there are many more available.DIVINE 20:34, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
• Delete - we don't need an article on every obscure Pokémon. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:36, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Pokemon that is not even known. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 20:57, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

 Redirect to List of Pokémon. While the article is not notable, I actually think it could be a useful redirect. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 16:11, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

• @DIVINE: The US Sun does not have real significant coverage of Gastrodon, and the Sportskeeda source does not seem like it would contribute to notability either. Besides, you need more sources than that for a fictional character. QuicoleJR (talk) 21:10, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

I understand. I will re-check and dig if I find more reliable sources, but there seem to be many sources about it. I am confused with the reliability of those sources. DIVINE 21:15, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

@QuicoleJR Just to let you know, I have added additional sources which you can find in the article reference section. DIVINE 19:24, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

•  Merge To List of Pokémon; references on the page are showing as depreciated and generally unreliable. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 19:32, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:30, 19 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 03:31, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Javad Mokhbery

Javad Mokhbery (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Shoot for the Stars has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not a notable person. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 04:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 04:30, 19 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 03:30, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Jay V. Surgent

Jay V. Surgent (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Shoot for the Stars has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not a notable lawyer. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 04:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 04:27, 19 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 03:29, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

John Laviter

John Laviter (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Shoot for the Stars has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No reliable sources covering this individual. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 04:23, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 04:23, 19 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 03:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Nicole Ellis

Nicole Ellis (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Shoot for the Stars has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails GNG. No reliable sources covering this person. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 04:20, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 04:20, 19 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 03:27, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Alex Fink

Alex Fink (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Shoot for the Stars has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not a notable person at all. Promotional article. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 04:17, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete The majority of sources are PR puff, and the article looks like an advertisement. DIVINE 20:59, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 04:17, 19 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 03:24, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Otherweb

Otherweb (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Shoot for the Stars has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not a notable company at all. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 04:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Fails WP:GNG.DIVINE 21:02, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 04:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 03:23, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Rich Dantona

Rich Dantona (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Shoot for the Stars has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not reliable sources. Fails GNG. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 04:14, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep/improve Although, there appears a lack of sources, however, I do believe, that the subject is notable and the article would need improvement, rather than deletion.Daniel Martin77 (talk) 22:40, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

This user has made few or no contributions outside of this page. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 17:33, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 04:14, 19 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 03:21, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Jackie Copeland

Jackie Copeland (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Shoot for the Stars has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This person fails WP:GNG. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 03:24, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 03:24, 19 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 03:20, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Jack Becht

Jack Becht (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Shoot for the Stars has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This person is not notable at all. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 03:22, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

He's a fashion person from Vogue and stuff. He's done a lot of stuff. I know him. 207.242.153.66 (talk) 13:56, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete WP:Before agrees with nom. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 09:45, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 03:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 03:19, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Azat Seidalin (sportsperson)

Azat Seidalin (sportsperson) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Shoot for the Stars has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails GNG. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 03:13, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Also has a undisclosed COI notice on it. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 09:39, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 03:13, 19 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. Redirected. --Auntof6 (talk) 03:18, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Shedinja

Shedinja (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

QuicoleJR has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not a notable Pokémon. The English Wikipedia does not currently have an article about it. QuicoleJR (talk) 00:55, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Not a notable Pokémon - MourningRainfall 🐺🇨🇦 (talk) 01:14, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
•  Redirect to List of Pokémon. While the article is not notable in itself, it can make a useful redirect to the List of Pokémon article. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 04:53, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
•  Redirect to List of Pokémon as well. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 09:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 00:55, 19 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 03:15, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

DD Osama

DD Osama (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability BigKrow (talk) 20:53, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep Has a page on enwiki and is indeed notable. Not a valid deletion request. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 20:59, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete No notability shown for an artist. No awards or anything being discovered in WP:Before Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 09:00, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:53, 18 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 03:13, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Sha Gz

Sha Gz (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability BigKrow (talk) 20:52, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete - Non-notable; no sources; wikidata object is basic to be created and new; honestly, this should have been a QD as no claim to notability was made. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 03:50, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Some random rapper that is not notable at all. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 21:01, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:52, 18 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 03:12, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Allamah Sayyid Muhibullah Shah Rashdi

Allamah Sayyid Muhibullah Shah Rashdi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Shoot for the Stars has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: There was a previous RFD that was closed as keep. All the votes on the last RFD were from globally banned users and sockpuppets. Not sure if this is notable. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 17:15, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep. Undoubtedly, he was the well known scholar in the middleast & Asia and one of the staunch believer who spread islam in Sindh, Pakistan. Moreover, he wrote many books, his sermons were recorded in tapes which are still being listened and praised by many. He devoted his life for islam so his Sons kept their father's legacy alive. May Allah bless them the highest ranks in jannah. No one can delete their struggle and efforts which they made in the name of Allah except the will of Allah. JazakAllah khairn 119.154.165.51 (talk) 21:56, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 08:56, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

• Keep. subject is already notable, his religious achievements widely recognized throughout the Islamic world. The references clearly support their notability. As well. ALI ABATCHA (talk) 15:40, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:15, 18 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 03:05, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Allamah Sayyid Ihsanullah Shah Rashdi

Allamah Sayyid Ihsanullah Shah Rashdi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Shoot for the Stars has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: There was a similar that article was previously up for RFD and was voted to keep all by globally banned users and sockpuppets. I am not sure this article is notable either. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 04:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC) Shoot for the Stars (talk) 04:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep: subject is notable and is widely known in Sindh with massive followings I think there is no doubt in it. Sources are readable 2A00:F29:2C9:393:143:1101:A945:421E (talk) 21:44, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

This IP has made few or no contributions outside of this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shoot for the Stars (talk • contribs) 21:06, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

• Keep. Clearly reputable religious scholar in Islamic world. ALI ABATCHA (talk) 16:16, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

This user has made few or no contributions outside of this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shoot for the Stars (talk • contribs) 21:06, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment:@ Shoot for the Stars can you link to the old RfD please? I searched the archives and did not see it and there is no tag on the talk page of the article for me to follow. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 06:58, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

PotsdamLamb: Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/Allamah Sayyid Muhibullah Shah Rashdi. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 16:05, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

I did the wrong nomination. The article I linked above was actually what I meant to put up for deletion. The other article had an RFD which was voted to keep all by globally banned users. The two just have a very similar title. I am not sure if this article is notable either. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 17:23, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 08:57, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 04:56, 18 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. --Auntof6 (talk) 02:57, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

FAQ

FAQ (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Carrot2333 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: WP:WINAD. This article is only a dictionary-style definition. Carrot2333 (talk) 00:10, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep - Cited/Somewhat expanded article[2], I tried adding the source from EN but it's banned so had to settle with crappy ones, Still does the job I suppose. Anyway obvious keep. –Davey2010^Talk 00:54, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep per Davey2010. They did a good job improving the article. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 04:01, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep the article looks good,informative. It is also properly. DIVINE 21:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 00:10, 18 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

Related pages

• All archives before July 2008 - implementation of new system made archives redundant
• Category:Requests for deletion that did not succeed
• Category:Requests for deletion that succeeded
• Wikipedia:Deletion policy
• Wikipedia:Quick deletion
• Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
• Category:Deletion requests
• Category:Quick deletion requests