Wikipedia:Editor review/ChristianMan16/3

ChristianMan16

ChristianMan16 (talk · contribs) I just want to get an update on my "things to improve list".-- Chris†ianMan16 ^{t c r} 21:25, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Reviews

• I don't really know what to say except what I've said before. You are a much improved editor, and this was a great showing of improved maturity. I hope you are unbanned from English Wikipedia soon, you have shown you can be a productive editor. God bless, TheAE talk 23:55, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

• First edit to simple-wiki in a long time... I concur with AE. It's about time your community ban on en-wiki was lifted. --Dylan620 _{(Sign this plz)} 23:57, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

• I beg to differ I'm afraid. I've seen too much poor judgement from CM to consider supporting unbanning from the bigger project. Majorly ^talk 00:00, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

• Your RFA votes are... let me say... at odds with the general norms. I don't have problems with opposing people but I worry when someone seems to oppose mostly, and for often weak reasoning as well. I consider anything to do with edit counting or time spent on the project as very weak reasoning. It's almost as if you're looking for a reason to oppose, and when you find a slight failing, you use it. Majorly ^talk 00:29, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

• You do a pretty good job working in the mainspace, but I'd recommend not worrying about your sig as much. Also, about your "weak" oppose votes at RFA: please remember to WP:AGF. Thanks, and have a good evening! :) Shapiros10 ^{Flap the Yap} 00:32, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Comments

• View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool

Questions

1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

   All wrestling related cause there would be no wrestling here if I and some others didn't chime in.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

   A little with Majorly, but nothing important.