Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback

Current requests for rollback

User:DIVINE

DIVINE (talk · contribs · count) (assign permissions)

Hello there, I would like to request rollback permission because I believe it will help save my little extra time with the tool while fighting against vandalism. I am well aware of rollback tools and their use, as I have previously served as a rollback on enwiki for a few years. I hope you will consider this request. DIV IN E 00:01, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator observation): This user has been absent from this wiki for two years. Upon coming back to SEWP, the editor immediately took me to WP:RFCU (See Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser#PotsdamLamb) for absolutely no reason or even researching anything. They also have a slew of issues on ENWP, involving legal threats (for which they were blocked on April 6, 2024 ENWP block log and calling admins an "Ass" (w:User_talk:Primefac/Archive_40#Hi) and saying it is acceptable "Btw, someone calling you ass is not harassment in Wikipedia I reckon via AN." They also had a lot of other issues with "demanding things" as recently as before their block and numerous times asked to have their rights taken away and then re-added and was even told it would be the last time and they would need to request them again via a RfP on ENWP. While the editor may have had rollback on another wiki, they need to understand more of how we work, which includes following simple instructions such as placing new requests at the top of an RFCU page (See which was not done here). I also recommend they spend more time doing something on our wiki than automated edits, which show up as most of their edits. I encourage admins to look at this editor's behavior carefully before granting additional rights on this wiki. --Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 02:01, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, I didn't call Primefac an ass. That was a different scenario when we were talking on the talk page, and I was asking them a question related to my ANI discussions, where one admin called me that. I requested my rights to be revoked and asked again after thinking, and I re-requested after a few weeks to have them revoked again according to Wikipedia policy, which is not known as demanding.

Secondly, your CU request was valid, and anyone can request CU. You were about to commit 3RR violations while removing that notice from the CU page.

Thirdly, legal threats issues arose from doxing and have already been resolved. I am following WP:STANDARD offer and haven't violated WP:SOCK policy. Plus, I was an editor here before I got blocked due to that issue.

In addition to the CU request placement, you could have pointed it out to me on my talk page or fixed it instead of complaining.

Fighting against vandalism or patrolling new pages always involves automated edits while putting warning templates on users' talk pages with the help of Twinkle.

Lastly, about contributing, I have created more than 61 pages and 14 pages recently without copying anything, but writing by myself. My motto is to create at least one page per day here on SWEP while being free.

Also, I don't understand why you bring enwiki issues here, while this is a completely different WikiProject, and I haven't done anything wrong here while volunteering with a positive attitude and positive manners. DIV IN E 04:14, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the place to dispute anything. I am allowed to bring up my opinion to any admin to consider. It is brought up here due to our One-strike policy. What you do on other projects is carried over to any other of the 850 or so projects under WMF. That is all I am going to say, as again, this is not a place to dispute anything. Also I do not know what you are referring to as you are following their standard offer and such, as you are indef blocked on ENWP as of April 3, 2024. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 04:22, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done ~~please wait a couple of months and ask again and I'm sure it'll be fine then.~~ I've changed my mind, a personal tiff is not a good reason to deny plus good reports to RFCU lately are helpful fr33k man 16:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:LOLHWAT

LOLHWAT (talk · contribs · count) (assign permissions)

Hello! I would like to be granted the rollback permission as I have good activity, no vandalism, and have improved articles. I have also participated in helpful discussion. Thanks! LOLHWAT (talk) 15:48, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Too soon - A user with 126 changes. Account created on March 24, 2024. Of course, it's up to an admin to decide; however, you have not been here a month yet and only have 126 edits on this Wikipedia. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 03:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
got it. LOLHWAT (talk) 16:17, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Thank you for volunteering, but you have too few edits on the mainspace and not enough track record of anti-vandalism activity. As of this reply, you have made 34 mainspace edits and made 5 undos, 2 of them with Twinkle. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 22:35, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]