Heteronormativity

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Heteronormativity is the belief that there are two types of people, and each has to act in a way that is already set out for them. These types of people, or genders, are men and women. Heteronormativity says that men and women make each other whole. Because of this, it says that relations between people of the same gender are not as good or normal as those between men and women. A heteronormative view of the world believes that a person's sex decides their sexuality, gender identity and gender roles. Homophobia, transphobia, and heterosexism could not exist without heteronormativity.[1]

According to queer theory, societies force heteronormativity on people it does not fit, such as LGBT people, queer people, and intersex people.

Where the word comes from[change | change source]

Michael Warner made the word "heteronormativity" popular in 1991 in one of the first books on queer theory.[2] It came from Gayle Rubin's idea of the "sex/gender system" and Adrienne Rich's idea of "compulsory heterosexuality."[3] According to Samuel A. Chambers, heteronormativity shows what societies expect, demand, and allow when they consider relations between men and women to be the only normal ones.[4][5]

Discrimination[change | change source]

People who argue against heteronormativity include Cathy J. Cohen, Michael Warner, and Lauren Berlant. They argue that it holds down those who do not fit it, marks them as outsiders, keeps them out of society, and makes it hard for them to express themselves.[1][6] Heteronormative policies and institutions strengthen the belief that people are heterosexual and that there are only two genders and sexes by nature.[7] They argue that heteronormative culture gives an unfair advantage to heterosexual people. It causes members of society to keep LGBT people out of work, school, and the greater society, sometimes using the law.[6]

Against gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people[change | change source]

According to the cultural anthropologist Gayle Rubin, heteronormativity ranks sexual practices from "good sex" to "bad sex." This "sex hierarchy" ranks sex between two married heterosexual people for the purpose of creating a child as "good," and ranks people and acts that fall short of this standard lower until they become "bad sex." Gay couples who are married are somewhere in the middle. Gay people who have sex with many partners are also in the middle, but below gay married couples.[8] Patrick McCreery, a lecturer at New York University, believes this is the reason why gay people are attacked for doing things that straight people also do, such as watching pornography or practicing BDSM.[6]

McCreery says that this "sex hierarchy" also exists in the workplace. Gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people are more likely to be kept out of work the lower they fall. Transgender people fall especially low in the hierarchy and face the most obvious discrimination. This leaves many LGBT people without jobs.[6] People can be fired for being LGBT, or they can never be offered a job for the same reason. In 1991 the restaurant Cracker Barrel in the United States made the news when it fired a lesbian worker. There was no law against this, and there is still no law against it in most of the country.[6]

Against intersex people[change | change source]

Intersex babies can be born with neither a penis nor a vagina. Doctors and parents often force intersex children to have surgery to make them look more like most men and women. Usually they are healthy without this and it is not necessary. Most intersex children are not allowed to decide if they want this surgery. This is not because there is anything wrong with their bodies. Rather, parents are often afraid that their children will be judged. In other words, doctors and parents force them to have surgery for social reasons, not biological ones.[9][10][11]

Sources[change | change source]

  1. 1.0 1.1 Lovaas, Karen, and Mercilee M. Jenkins. "Charting a Path through the 'Desert of Nothing.'" Sexualities and Communication in Everyday Life: A Reader. 8 July 2006. Sage Publications Inc. 5 May 2008
  2. Warner, Michael (1991), "Introduction: Fear of a Queer Planet". Social Text; 9 (4 [29]): 3–17
  3. Adrienne Rich, 'Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence' Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 5:631-60, 1980.
  4. Samuel A. Chambers, "Telepistemology of the Closet; Or, the Queer Politics of Six Feet Under". Journal of American Culture 26.1: 24–41, 2003
  5. Samuel A. Chambers, "Revisiting the Closet: Reading Sexuality in Six Feet Under, in Reading Six Feet Under. McCabe and Akass, eds. IB Taurus, 2005.
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 Krupat, Kitty (2001). Out at Work: Building a Gay-Labor Alliance. U of Minnesota Press. pp. 268. ISBN 0-8166-3741-5.
  7. DeFrancisco, Victoria (2014). Gender in Communication. U.S.A: SAGE Publication, Inc.. pp. 16. ISBN 978-1-4522-2009-3.
  8. Rubin, Gayle. Thinking Sex: Notes for a Radical Theory of the Politics of Sexuality, in Vance, Carole. Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality (1993)
  9. Fausto-Sterling, Anne. 2000. Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. New York: Basic Books.
  10. Butler, Judith. 2004. Undoing Gender. New York: Routledge.
  11. Wilchins, Riki. 2002. 'A certain kind of freedom: power and the truth of bodies – four essays on gender.' In GenderQueer: Voices from beyond the sexual binary. Los Angeles: Alyson Books 23–66.