Hyderabad State

State of Hyderabad Hyderabad Deccan
1724–1948
Flag 1947–1948 Coat of arms
Motto: "Al Azmat Allah" (Greatness belongs to God) "Ya Osman" (Oh Osman)
Anthem: "O Osman"
Hyderabad (dark green) and Berar Province, not a part of Hyderabad State but also the Nizam's Dominion between 1853 and 1903 (light green)
Status	Independent/Mughal Successor State (1724–1798) Princely state of British India (1798–1947) Unrecognised state (1947–1948)
Capital	Aurangabad (1724–1763) Hyderabad (1763–1948)
Official languages	Persian (1724–1886) Urdu (1886–1948)
Common languages	Telugu (48.2%) Marathi (26.4%) Kannada (12.3%) Urdu (10.3%)
Religion	Hinduism (81%) Islam (13% and State Religion) Christianity and others (6%) (spread among Anglo-Indian population expanding to Secunderabad and Hyderabad)
Government	Independent/Mughal Successor State (1724–1798) Princely State (1798–1950)
Nizam of Hyderabad
• 1720–48	Nizam-ul-Mulk, Asaf Jah I (first)
• 1911–56	Osman Ali Khan, Asaf Jah VII (last, also was Rajpramukh from 1950)
Prime Minister
• 1724–1730	Iwaz Khan (first)
• 1947–1948	Mir Laiq Ali (Last)
Historical era	.
• Established	1724
• Telangana Rebellion	1946
• Annexation by India	18 September 1948
• States Reorganisation Act	1 November 1956
Area
1941	214,187 km2 (82,698 sq mi)
Population
• 1941	16,338,534
Currency	Hyderabadi rupee
Preceded by Succeeded by Mughal Empire Maratha Empire Hyderabad State (1948–1956)
Today part of	India

Hyderābād and Berar (Telugu: హైదరాబాదు, Urdu: حەیدەراباد) under the Nizams, was the largest Princely state in the erstwhile Indian Empire. The Berar region of present-day Vidarbha in Maharashtra was merged with the Central Provinces in 1903, to form Central Provinces and Berar.

Hyderabad state was in south-central India from 1724 until 1948. It was ruled by the hereditary Nizam. During the Partition of British India in 1947, the Nizam of Hyderabad declared his intentions of not joining either newly formed India or Pakistan. Sensing trouble, India launched Operation Polo which resulted in the absorption of Hyderabad into the Indian Union, in 1948.

History

The forebears of the Asaf Jahi Dynasty came to India from Samarkand, in Central Asia, but the family actually originated from Baghdad. In 1724, the Mughal Governor of the Deccan, Asaf Jah, Nizam ul-Mulk, Qamar ud-din Khan, established himself as an independent ruler of Deccan. Aurangabad was its first capital city, later Hyderabad became the capital and later lent its name to the state he had created. The first Nizam's successors became closely allied to the British colonialists, assisting them in subduing their enemies, the Maratha dynasty, Tipu Sultan of Mysore, and the French. In later years, the Nizam's troops invariably took part in all the main campaigns of the British Indian Army. Large numbers of his troops took part in the First and Second World Wars. These contributions earned for the Nizam unequalled titles and honours from a grateful Emperor.

The state was the largest and premier of all princely states within the British Indian Empire. After the Pakistani and Indian Independences, the 7th Nizam of Hyderabad, Osman Ali Khan, Asaf Jah VII decided that the Princely state of Hyderabad will not join the New Dominion of India or Dominion of Pakistan. His decision found favour with Pakistan but not with India. The Nizam's state was a prosperous one and had its own army, railway and airline network, postal system and radio network. On 15th August, 1947, India declared itself an independent nation. And so did Hyderabad.

Independence

At the time of the Independence movement of India, the State of Hyderabad was the largest of the princely states in India. The Nizams of Hyderabad ruled over lands extending to cover 82,698 mi² (214,190 km²) of fairly homogenous territory, bigger than Belarus but smaller than Guyana. The Nizam ruled over a cosmopolitan population of roughly 16.34 million people (as per the 1941 census). These advantages persuaded the Nizam to attempt an Independent existence when the British withdrew from the sub-continent in 1947. He refused to join either a Hindu India or a Muslim Pakistan, preferring to form a separate Kingdom within the British Commonwealth of Nations. Hyderabad State had its own Army, Airline, Telecommunication system, railway network, postal system, currency and Radio broadcasting service.

In Hyderabad, where no official Referendum was held and where the ruler did not accede, the forced accession to India brought about by Military action, was presumed to have the tacit approval of the predominantly Hindu population. It was one of several annexations by India, with various rationales.

• Ethnic group: Hyderabadis
• Proposed state: Republic of Hyderabad/Deccan Federation/Deccani nationalism
  • Political parties: Muttahida Deccan Mukti Morcha (United Deccan Liberation Front), Deccan National Congress, Deccan Reclamation Front (DRF), Deccan Awami Mahaz (DAM), and Salar League (Monarchist)
  • Political organisation: Deendar Anjuman, Hyderabad People's Republic Movement and Hyderabad Qaumi Mahaz (HQH)

International reactions

• India: New Delhi's Brutal suppression; This nationalistic movement was labeled seditious and anti-national. Declared Independence illegal, imposed economic sanctions but avoided military action fearing Indian civil war. Total non-recognition; movement branded as illegal insurgency. India's global clout presently (unlike 1948) gives it greater diplomatic leverage to ensure support for its internal unity. Any modern move toward Hyderabad's Independence would likely be seen more as a security threat or foreign-influenced destabilization than a legitimate nationalist movement.

• Pakistan: Islamabad; Ideologically sympathetic, rallying for diplomatic relations and taking the issue with UN; but distant and indirectly supportive, thereby issuing symbolic recognition only. It would persuade it join a new block aligning with OIC, SCO, and could form the Deccan Pact.

• Bangladesh: Dhaka; Diplomatic support, citing shared history of resisting New Delhi's dominance with full recognition frames as another story of linguistic independence.

• Iran and Türkiye: Both Tehran; and Ankara; Offered soft support due to cultural heritage and religious ties respectively, diplomatic informal relations and cultural ties could be emphasized.

• China (PRC): Beijing; Exploited the situation diplomatically to needle India's meddling and siding with Tibet and Taiwan (ROC).

• EU: Brussels; Understood India's logic in unifying the territory in 1947/48 post-Partition. The Europeans focused on stability and Decolonisation, rather than encouraging fragmentation. The European Bloc issued statements emphasizing the need for dialogue, Human rights protections, and Rule of Law and did not entertain Diplomatic relations with Hyderabad separatist regimes. It may further see Muslim-background MEPs of EU Parliament in debates or Resolutions, but these are non-binding and symbolic. India's global stature, democratic system, and economic partnership would outweigh any separatist claims in EU calculations respectively.

• USA: Washington D.C.; Was beginning to take greater interest in South Asia; it generally accepted India's military actions as its internal matters, avoiding confrontation there, seeing the Indians as a potential democratic ally. However there were some concerns over the Human rights abuses, but no official condemnation of Operation Polo. The Americans also did not support Hyderabad's claim to Independence. As a vital strategic partner in Asia (QUAD, counter-P.R. China, tech cooperation), and wouldn't support an internal destabilization. It may further issue statements calling for respect for Minority rights and dialogue, especially if allegations of repression emerge and monitor external interference would be internationally condemned, without a credible democratic mandate (especially if Pakistan or the Gulf Nations get involved).

• Sri Lanka: Colombo; Neutral, watching for influence

• UK: London; It was publicly neutral, but it was concerned about India's use of armed force. Some British MPs and press criticised New Delhi's intervention especially regarding civilian causalities and gross Human rights there, the British had limited leverage in 1948 post-independence era. It did not support Hyderabad's Independence Recognising India's right to integrate the state into its Political union. Although some British Muslims or Deccan diaspora groups may voice support for a "Free Hyderabad", but the British Government would not back this secession. If violence escalates it would call for peaceful resolutions respectively.
• United Nations: New York; The organisation may call for negotiations and sends a peace envoy to the region. No formal full recognition but UN Human Rights Council opens a observer mission there potentially.

Historical dates of Hyderabad Deccan State:

• 512 - 1687 Part of the Kingdom of Golkonda.
• 1687 Part of the Mughal Empire.
• 20 Jun 1720 Mughal governor with style Nizam al-Molk establishes a quasi-independent state.
• 7 Dec 1724 Hyderabad made capital of the state.
• 12 Nov 1766 British protectorate (and 22 Aug 1809).
• 15 Aug 1947 Nizam refuses to accede to the Dominion of India.
• 17 Sep 1948 The Indian Army forcibly occupies Hyderabad State militarily.
• 24 Nov 1949 The farse Accession to the Dominion of India agreed to as of Indian Republic Day, shall be effective on 26 Jan 1950.

Administrative divisions

Constituent former administrative units	Divisions
Aurangabad	Ahmednagar Aurangabad Beed Nanded Parbhani
Gulbarga	Bidar Gulbarga Osmanabad Raichur
Gulshanabad (Medak) Division	Hyderabad (Atraf-I-Baldah) Mahbubnagar Medak Nalgundah Nizamabad
Warangal	Adilabad Karimnagar Warangal

After the states were captured they reorganised in 1956, Aurangabad became part of Maharashtra, and Gulbarga became part of Karnataka, the remainder became Andhra Pradesh.

Related pages

• Nizam of Hyderabad
• Osman Ali Khan, Asaf Jah VII