Judicial opinion

	Legal and judicial opinions
Judicial opinions & aggregates for official decisions (O.S-Federal)
	Majority opinion; Dissenting opinion; Plurality opinion; Concurring opinion; Memorandum opinion; Per curiam opinion; Seriatim opinion; This box: view; talk; edit;

A judicial opinion is a form of legal opinion written by a judge or a panel of judges explaining how they resolved a legal dispute.^[1] It cites the decision reached to resolve the dispute. A judicial opinion usually includes the reasons behind the decision.^[1] Where there are three or more judges, it may take the form of a majority opinion, minority opinion or a concurring opinion.^[2]

Kinds of judicial opinions[change | change source]

A majority opinion is a judicial opinion agreed to by more than half of the members of a court. A majority opinion sets becomes the decision of the court in a particular case.

A concurring opinion is written to agree with a decision, but for giving different reasons for the agreement. When it is joined by the greatest number of judges, it is referred to as the plurality opinion.

A dissenting opinion (or dissent) is an opinion written by one or more judges expressing disagreement with the majority opinion. A dissenting opinion does not create binding precedent nor does it become a part of case law.

↑ ^1.0 ^1.1 Orin S. Kerr (August 2005). "How to Read a Judicial Opinion: A Guide for New Law Students" (PDF). Carnegie Mellon; Computation Organizations & Society. Retrieved 15 March 2016.
↑ "judicial opinion". Archived from the original on 9 June 2016. Retrieved 15 March 2016.