Textual difficulty means how easy or hard a text is to read. Research has shown that two main factors affect the ease with which texts are read.
- How difficult the words are: this is lexical difficulty. Rare words are less well known than common words. Rare, difficult words are often longer than common, easy words.
- How difficult the sentences are: this is syntactical difficulty. Long, complicated sentences cause more difficulty than short, simple sentences.
- 1 Readability predictions
- 2 Direct measurement
- 3 Types of tests
- 4 Use on Wikipedia
- 5 Related pages
- 6 References
- 7 Other websites
Readability predictions[change | change source]
A readability test is a way to measure a text for how easy it is to read. Readability tests give a prediction as to how difficult readers will find a particular text. They do this by measuring one or both of the two main causes, as follows:
Word difficulty[change | change source]
Word difficulty is usually measured by vocabulary lists or word length. In 1923, Bertha A. Lively and Sidney L. Pressey published the first reading ease formula. They had been concerned that science textbooks in junior high school had so many technical words. They felt that teachers spent all class time explaining their meaning. They argued that their formula would help to measure and reduce the “vocabulary burden” of textbooks. Their formula used the Thorndike word list as a basis. Manually, it took three hours to apply the formula to a book.
Vocabulary lists[change | change source]
Several vocabulary lists have been published by researchers. These lists are based on samples of published texts in English, and (less often) samples of recorded spoken language. The lists differ slightly according to the sources chosen, but they are very reliable. The items listed may represent more than one actual word; they are lemmas. For instance the entry "be" contains within it the occurrences of "is", "was", "be" and "are". The top 100 lemmas account for 50% of all the words in the Oxford English Corpus.
The Reading Teachers Book of Lists claims that the first 25 words make up about one-third of all printed material in English, and that the first 100 make up about one-half of all written material.
One of the first readability tests, the Dale–Chall formula, used a vocabulary list. It counted the number of listed words in a passage, and applied a formula which gave a grade level. It was used to rate textbooks for grade levels in US school districts.
It is easy, in principle, to use a vocabulary list as part of a computer-based readability measure. The list is organised as a look-up table. The percentage of listed words in a passage gives the data for the formula, and the user is presented with a grade level.
Word length[change | change source]
This is called an index, or a proxy. This is because word length is correlated with word frequency, and word frequency is correlated with word difficulty. Longer words are, on average, harder than short words.
Word length is measured by counting the letters in each word, or by counting syllables. Since most syllables have one vowel, some computer programs count vowels per average word. A few tests measure the percentage of words on a list; the list is based on the known frequency of words in a language.
Sentence difficulty[change | change source]
Sentence difficulty is usually measured by sentence length. This again is an index, because longer sentences are, on average, harder than short sentences. Computers count the number of words between full stops, but this is a second-best method. Humans can judge whether a semi-colon or colon should count as the end of a sentence for testing purposes.
Since both factors may vary independently of each other, the best prediction is gained by devising a formula with makes use of both indices. What this means is that a single score is produced for a text, and that score is looked up on a table or graph. That tells you how difficult the text is in terms of either a) an American school grade level, or b) an artificial scale of 0% to 100%. Either way is effective. What really makes a difference is:
- Methods using both indices are more reliable than methods using only one index.
Direct measurement[change | change source]
It is possible to get a good prediction by getting a group of subjects to read through a passage, followed by multiple-choice questions. Even better is a method called cloze, where subjects fill in blanks on a text they have not seen before. The percentage of correctly completed blanks is an outstandingly good predictor of text difficulty.
Naturally, this kind of direct measure requires subjects and a skilled experimenter. It also requires the prior preparation of texts suitable for the chosen sample of subjects. The method is therefore too expensive for widespread use.
Types of tests[change | change source]
- See also: List of readability tests
Tests on subjects[change | change source]
- Multiple-choice questions
- Cloze test
Test on texts[change | change source]
Two-variable formulae[change | change source]
- Dale–Chall readability formula
- Flesch Reading Ease (Flesch Readability Test)
- Flesch–Kincaid Reading Level (Flesch-Kincaid Grade Index)
- Fry readability formula
One-variable formulae[change | change source]
Use on Wikipedia[change | change source]
Their summary was:
- "The authors concluded that the readability of online patient information for ‘liposuction’ and ‘breast reconstruction’ is ‘too difficult’ for many patients as the readability scores of all 20 websites (10 each) far exceeds that of a 6th-grade reading level. The average score for the most popular ‘liposuction’ websites was determined equal to 13.6-grade level. As a comparison ‘tattoo information’ scored at the 7.8-grade level".
- "Health care information available at the most popular websites for ‘breast reconstruction’ had an average readability score of 13.4, with 100% of the top 10 websites providing content far above the recommended 6th grade reading level. Wikipedia.org readability scores aligned at the higher readability range for both terms, with scores above the 14 grade level for ‘liposuction’, and above grade 15 for ‘breast reconstruction’".
That shows these articles, and presumably many other medical articles on English wiki, are written in prose far too difficult for the average member of the public.
Related pages[change | change source]
References[change | change source]
- Klare G.R. 1963. The measurement of readability. Iowa State University Press, Ames IA.
- Thorndike E.L. 1921 The teacher's word book. 1932 A teacher's word book of the twenty thousand words found most frequently and widely in general reading for children and young people. 1944 (with J.E. Lorge) The teacher's word book of 30,000 words.
- Lively, Bertha A. and Pressey S.L. 1923. A method for measuring the 'vocabulary burden' of textbooks. Educational administration and supervision 9:389–398.
- In this context, 'reliable' means something like: if the research was repeated, you would get a very similar result.
- 500 most common words: 
- Top 1000 words: 
- Benjamin Zimmer: Time after time after time... Language Log. Retrieved 22 June 2006.
- AskOxford.com: Language Facts. Retrieved 22 June 2006.
- First 100 words: 
- A proxy is one person or thing standing for another.
- Taylor W.L. 1953. Cloze procedure: a new tool for measuring readability. Journalism Quarterly, 30, 415-433.
- Vargas, Christina R. et al 2015. Online patient resources for liposuction: a comparative analysis of readability. Annals of Plastic Surgery: 1.
- Vargas, Christina R. et al 2015. Assessment of online patient materials for breast reconstruction. Journal of Surgical Research. 
Other websites[change | change source]
- Is Wikipedia too difficult? comparative analysis of Wikipedia, Simple Wikipedia and Britannica. 
- Writing Sample Analyzer, reports on the Flesch Reading Ease, Fog Scale Level, and Flesch–Kincaid Grade Level for a given piece of text.
- Online Textual Difficulty Calculator - reports ARI, SMOG, Flesch–Kincaid Readability Test, Coleman–Liau Index, Gunning–Fog Index, etc.
- BYU Words and phrases: highlights text.  and