Sally Yates

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Sally Yates
Sally Q. Yates.jpg
United States Attorney General
In office
January 20, 2017 – January 30, 2017
President Donald Trump
Preceded by Loretta Lynch
Succeeded by Dana Boente (Acting)
United States Deputy Attorney General
In office
January 10, 2015 – January 30, 2017
President Barack Obama
Donald Trump
Preceded by James Cole
Succeeded by Rod J. Rosenstein (Nominee)
United States Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia
In office
March 10, 2010 – January 10, 2015
President Barack Obama
Preceded by David Nahmias
Succeeded by John Horn
Personal details
Born Sally Caroline Quillian
(1960-08-20) August 20, 1960 (age 57)
Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.
Political party Democratic

Sally Caroline Quillian Yates (born August 20, 1960 in Atlanta) is an American lawyer. She studied at the University of Georgia and was the acting Attorney General of the United States from January 20, 2017 through January 30, 2017. She was also serving as Deputy Attorney General from March 2015 until her dismissal on January 30, 2017.[1][2][3]

Dismissal as Acting Attorney General[change | change source]

On January 30, 2017, President Donald Trump fired her after saying she won't defend his executive order on the immigration ban.

Sally Yates explained her decision not to defend the executive order in the following letter to the DOJ employees:

On January 27, 2017, the President signed an Executive Order regarding immigrants and refugees from certain Muslim-majority countries. The order has now been challenged in a number of jurisdictions. As the Acting Attorney General, it is my ultimate responsibility to determine the position of the Department of Justice in these actions.

My role is different from that of the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC), which, through administrations of both parties, has reviewed Executive Orders for form and legality before they are issued. OLC’s review is limited to the narrow question of whether, in OLC’s view, a proposed Executive Order is lawful on its face and properly drafted. Its review does not take account of statements made by an administration or it surrogates close in time to the issuance of an Executive Order that may bear on the order’s purpose. And importantly, it does not address whether any policy choice embodied in an Executive Order is wise or just.

Similarly, in litigation, DOJ Civil Division lawyers are charged with advancing reasonable legal arguments that can be made supporting an Executive Order. But my role as leader of this institution is different and broader. My responsibility is to ensure that the position of the Department of Justice is not only legally defensible, but is informed by our best view of what the law is after consideration of all the facts. In addition, I am responsible for ensuring that the positions we take in court remain consistent with this institution’s solemn obligation to always seek justice and stand for what is right. At present, I am not convinced that the defense of the Executive Order is consistent with these responsibilities nor am I convinced that the Executive Order is lawful.

Consequently, for as long as I am the Acting Attorney General, the Department of Justice will not present arguments in defense of the Executive Order, unless and until I become convinced that it is appropriate to do so.[4]

2015 Confirmation Hearing[change | change source]

A career prosecutor in Atlanta who has served under both Republican and Democrat administrations, Sally Yates has been hailed as a hero by both parties. Senator Johnny Isakson, Republican of Georgia, introduced her at her confirmation hearing in 2015.

She will be a hero of the American people, a hero of what’s right,” Mr. Isakson said at the time. “She’ll call them like she sees them, and she will be fair, and she will be just.”

At those hearings, Republicans were furious about former President Barack Obama’s order liberalizing immigration policy and questioned Ms. Yates about whether she would be willing to stand up to the president. Senator Jeff Sessions, Republican of Alabama and Mr. Trump’s nominee for attorney general, was particularly pointed in his questioning.

If the views the president wants to execute are unlawful, should the attorney general or the deputy attorney general say ‘No?’” Mr. Sessions asked.

“I believe the attorney general or deputy attorney general has an obligation to follow the law and Constitution and give their independent legal advice to the president,” Ms. Yates replied[5].

References[change | change source]

  1. "Sally Yates, Pick for Loretta Lynch's No. 2, Is Questioned". Wall Street Journal. 24 March 2015. Retrieved 24 April 2015. 
  4. "Letter From Sally Yates" (PDF). The New York Times. January 30, 2017. Retrieved January 30, 2017. 
  5. "Trump's Talk About Muslims Led Acting Attorney General to Defy Ban". New York Times. New York Times. January 31, 2017. Retrieved January 31, 2017.