Jump to content

Suzanne Amador Kane

From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Suzanne Amador Kane is an American physicist and a professor at Haverford College in Pennsylvania.[1] She is known for using physics to study how animals move and behave.[2] Her research has helped scientists learn more about birds like falcons and peacocks.[3][4] Her work also helps engineers design better robot swarms.[1] Kane won an award from the American Physical Society in 2020.[2] She is also the author of a book called Introduction to Physics in Modern Medicine.[5]

Kane combines studies of zoology and physics.[2] She taught her students in this way too.[2] She studied many different animals and birds.[3] Kane was the lead author on an important study about falcons.[4] Another study included peacocks.[3] This groundbreaking study showed that peacock feathers and crests were more than just decoration.[3] The crests were actually sensors.[3] The study showed that peacock feathers are tuned to vibrate at the exact same frequencies as at which a displaying peacock is rattling his tail.[3] This also inspired her to do more research on other birds.[3] Kane taught at Haverford College in Pennsylvania and received the prestigious American Physical Society award for her teaching.[1][2] She wrote the famous book “Introduction to physics in modern medicine.”[5]

References

[change | change source]
  1. 1 2 3 "Birds Of A Feather Attack Together". AIP. 2010-05-04. Retrieved 2025-04-18.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 "Honors and Award Winners". www.aps.org. Retrieved 2025-04-18.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Yong, Ed (December 21, 2018). "A Courting Peacock Can Shake Its Partner's Head From Afar". The Atlantic. Retrieved 2025-04-18.
  4. 1 2 Johns, Graydon (January 21, 2014). "In Case You Missed It: Flight of the falcon reveals unfair hunting advantage". Las Vegas Review-Journal. Retrieved 2025-04-18.
  5. 1 2 Gonzalez-Espada, W. (2009). College Students’ Opinions of Engaging Approaches in a Physical Science Course. Journal of College Science Teaching, 38(5), 22–27. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42993978