Talk:Covalent bond

This page is utter nonsense[change source]

How has it come to pass that this material can exist in this form, for the most impressionable readers to engage? See this for comparison: [1], accessed 31 January 2015. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 23:06, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article edited[change source]

To make passingly acceptable.

Done. Completely replaced the largely errant, and completely non-encyclopedic text, with information based on reliable sources, including from the English wikipedia, and another as cited. The nonsense regarding "Diamond is an example of Giant Covalent bond of carbon" is now gone. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 02:15, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And unsimplified and virtually unreadable by anyone except a graduate chemist. It's all very well to make critical remarks about editing which is incorrect and hence unsuitable in an encyclopedia. But it's far more difficult to write so that the ideas can be understood by someone with only a basic grasp of our language. Macdonald-ross (talk) 16:09, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]