Talk:Fayez al-Sarraj

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

al-Sarraj no longer Prime Minister[change source]

Looking at enwiki, I can see that al-Sarraj's term as Prime Minister is over. However, there is some reverting going on over this.
Edit warring is useless so let's discuss. Pinging all involved @Cuddles9999, PotsdamLamb, and 92.28.52.84:Belwine (talk) 20:00, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Belwine: This is a BLP article and they are adding information without references. The IP just came off a 31-hour block a couple of days ago for the same thing. They listed in one edit they added sources, but there are no recent refs. PotsdamLamb (talk) 20:03, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Just because it doesn't have a ref doesn't mean you should blanket revert. Go and see if what they added is true. Took me a couple seconds to verify it. -Djsasso (talk) 20:07, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
We've got to think about what WP:BLP is addressing. "Heated, arguable, material about living persons that is unsourced (without references) or poorly sourced—even if the content is negative (bad), positive (good), or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion." Whilst, yes, a source would have been much better, it is not controversial material. His time as Prime Minister has just ended, I wouldn't think that is controversial.
Whilst it is very obvious that this IP's edits on Joe Biden were clearly vandalism and in bad-faith, these edits do not seem to be in bad-faith. —Belwine (talk) 20:07, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I want to note I only made one revert which is when the information was added without a source but the ip said in the edit history log “adding source”. All the other reverts were done by cuddles. PotsdamLamb (talk) 01:24, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I let Cuddles know on their talk page. —Belwine (talk) 08:20, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]