Talk:Formal language

I've restored my earlier change - which wasn't vandalism (but was done when I wasn't logged in). It's an attempt to simplify the language, and clarify some of the key concepts. CompSciChris (talk) 21:14, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Language isn't quite simple enough[change source]

Some of the language used isn't simple enough, at least in my opinion. While I recognise that this topic isn't a simple one, someone can surely break this down into simple building blocks which are explained in not-so-formal language (hehe)? That kiwi guy (talk) 08:28, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Formal languages with ambiguity?[change source]

Formal languages are constructed, they contain a set of symbols, amongst other things. One aim of creating a formal language is to be as precise as possible. So, please, where's the real-world example of a formal language that contains ambiguity? Eptalon (talk) 17:22, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]