Talk:Impact of Christianity on western civilization

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article seems to be for one religion and make that religion seem better than the others. It is also one-sided. Can you help and make it NPOV? Frogger48 (talk) 00:08, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The change of title to western civilisation is a much better description of its content. Historically, no other religion has had anything like the influence that Christianity had in Europe. Of course, there are other civilisations... Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:43, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orthography[change source]

We move between "church" and "Church" even in a single sentence. To have a capital letter (upper case) a word must be a proper noun. Christianity is famous for its schisms, and does not have any one single organisation. To avoid having to go into all the details it seems best to write the word with a lower case initial throughout. I thought I'd air this on the talk page before doing anything, except to say that we do have to be consistent about these details. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:49, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is very useful. Zhangzheng123 (talk) 17:54, 29 January 2015 (UTC) I do not understand!Zhangzheng123 (talk) 17:54, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There were some sentences which made no sense, so I have taken them out. It's clear someone did a bad cut-and-paste job. It's still a rather biased page. Macdonald-ross (talk) 18:29, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest for deletion until this can be cleaned up[change source]

This article is a gigantic piece of garbage. I don't have the time for the next few weeks, but really, this thing is biased garbage. "Historically the Church has been anti-science". Really? That runs entirely counter to the facts. Facts like the earliest of the great scientists in Western Civilization actually decided to study Science because they knew God was unchanging and reliable, and therefore His creation is likely something we can study and get *repeatable* results in controlled circumstances. That idea ran entirely counter to the prevalent view of the day, that the whims of spirits, or emotional "gods" ruled things, and you never knew what you were going to get. Barwick (talk) 04:30, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]