Talk:International Planning History Society

I don't find a reason to delet this article. i hope it will stay. פארוק (talk) 21:52, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The reason is given in the QD notice: no indication of notability. Why is this organization notable? --Auntof6 (talk) 22:05, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Becouse that is an important organization that also writes and publishes articles in major science papers and publishes academic books about this subject. פארוק (talk) 04:36, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Then say that in the article, preferably with a reference or two. What important papers and books has it published? A Wikipedia article needs to give the reason that the subject is notable. --Auntof6 (talk) 06:25, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is mentioned in "The Routledge Companion to Britain in the Twentieth Century" by Mark Clapson.--Peterdownunder (talk) 22:43, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am not so sure, but i think that i found another links that is connect to this article ==>>> European Association for Urban History . פארוק (talk) 23:24, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Those look like primary sources. They can be in the article, but don't necessarily support notability. --Auntof6 (talk) 00:23, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have declined the QD because the article asserts the organisation's notability: "with architecture and urban planning faculties around the world" (my emphasis). Of course, the article may be put up for deletion at RfD if anyone wishes to challenge the notability of the subject itself. Chenzw Talk 05:55, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]