Talk:Jat (caste)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jat (caste) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (`~~~~`). New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite, and welcoming to new users Assume good faith Do not attack other users For disputes, please see our guideline	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

Semi-protection

This article has been semi-protected for 3 months due to a long-term revert war ongoing with this article. The current version appears to be stable and has less issues than the other version, but I welcome any comments on how this article can be improved. Griff (talk) 13:58, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

{{Editsemiprotected}} much more needed perhaps fair enough @Griffinofwales to staling the protection belive me or not the best you could do for this article by resorting to quant version[1] before this mess creator making incoherent edit summary to disclosed this issue 2409:40D6:10E7:8EFF:48EF:1822:740D:E69F (talk) 14:21, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use the template to request changes. Discuss the changes first, then we can edit the article. What are the issues with the current version of the article? Griff (talk) 14:30, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Change's X to Y Explaination

Regarding the previous revision, I firmly believe that it was significantly better in terms of accuracy and stability. The most crucial point here is in the leading paraphrasing it dosent comtain volatile word such as Semi nomadic or rural community Context:None of sourcing outlets dosent event contain such illustrious statements that the user making these recent edits has no genuine interest in contributing meaningfully to the article. Instead, they seem to be here solely to spam and create unnecessary disruption. This repeated nuisance is affecting the integrity of the content.

References 2409:40D6:10E7:8EFF:48EF:1822:740D:E69F (talk) 14:38, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is the only concern the wording of "semi nomadic or rural community"? If it is changed to The Jat people are a traditionally agricultural community found in northwestern India and Pakistan, is that acceptable? Griff (talk) 14:56, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Griffinofwales I just told you before that for more context I I had already informed User:HistorianAlferedo about this earlier, but I see no issue in reiterating it now. Perhaps there was some misunderstanding in how it was perceived.

From my side, I thoroughly reviewed everything, including the caste structure and historical context, ensuring it was supported by proper sources. If there are any remaining aspects that need refinement, I will work on addressing them as well. However, historian Alfredo has completely disrupted everything, creating a mess.

To restore accuracy and maintain the integrity of the article, we need to reverse the recent changes and reinstate the previous version. 2409:40D6:10E7:8EFF:48EF:1822:740D:E69F (talk) 15:02, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to help here. I understand there is a separate version of the article, but that is for a larger discussion. Focusing on the current article, what is not accurate about the content presented? Griff (talk) 15:17, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Because of it malfunction i will try to just breakdown in few points. first of all, The image that has been added is completely irrelevant to the article, something I have already pointed out before. There is no harm in stating this again. Since this is an important matter, it should be handled carefully.

If any unauthorized user attempts to make such edits again, it should be considered a clear case of sock evasion (using multiple accounts to manipulate edits)WP:Sock of User:HistorianAlferedo. I have strong reasons to believe that this is a sockpuppet of deliberately trying to disrupt the integrity of the Jat caste article. Their actions appear to be intentional, aimed at misleading and misrepresenting information. 2409:40D6:10E7:8EFF:48EF:1822:740D:E69F (talk) 14:48, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi Protected Proposal

{{editsemiprotected}} **Request for Revision Reinstatement: Jat Article**

@Griffinofwales 2409:40D6:10E7:8EFF:48EF:1822:740D:E69F (talk) 15:17, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Moved content to the subpage to not spam the discussion page. I have major concerns with the tone of the proposed article and I do not believe it is encyclopedic, however I welcome discussions on this page to discuss further. Griff (talk) 15:20, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I got your dubious concern but why you revert my patterning of Change X to Y summary its not spam but rather be a sourced section and most importantly its better than this outdated sourcing@Griffinofwales 2409:40D6:10E7:8EFF:48EF:1822:740D:E69F (talk) 15:23, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Griffinofwales can you subordinate my visualisation of amendable sources with original research without any potholes in articulation, its upon you 2409:40D6:10E7:8EFF:48EF:1822:740D:E69F (talk) 15:38, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. Edits to the main article will require discussion on this page. If you continue to spam this page with edit requests, it will result in a block. -Griff (talk) 16:08, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]