Talk:List of scientists from South America

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Red-link scientists"[change source]

Here is a List of "red-link scientists".
Feel free to click on the red link, to start an article (or stub of an article).
Some say that there should not be too many "red-link scientists" in an article.

Argentina[change source]

Bolivia[change source]

Brazil[change source]

Guyana[change source]

Sources[change source]

  1. Layme, Beatriz (2016-04-06). "Xavier Albó a Evo: "Tú puedes descansar el 2019 y luego volver"". Página Siete. La Paz, Bolivia. Retrieved 2016-05-16.
  2. "Conozca a los 12 candidatos de La Paz". Caracol Radio. 2006-06-27. Retrieved 2011-06-03.
  3. "Evo elige nuevos mandos en la Aduana y Ministerio de Educación". BolPress. 2008-11-07. Retrieved 2011-06-03.
  4. CIA World Leaders
  5. http://www.nasonline.org/site/Dir/989495092?pg=rslts
  6. http://www.thehistorymakers.org/biography/godfrey-gumbs
  7. 7.0 7.1 Shilpa Buch, Barry T. Rouse, Howard E. Gendelman, M. Christine Zink and Janice E. Clements (January 2008). "Opendra "Bill" Narayan (1936–2007): A Personal Tribute to a Friend, Teacher, and Colleague". Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology. 3 (1): 1–4. doi:10.1007/s11481-008-9101-y.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  8. Debretts.com Archived December 24, 2013, at the Wayback Machine Persaud's biography.

Temporary need for this list[change source]

There (arguably) is a need for this list.

Category (and before the article maybe gets deleted)[change source]

Move to "national list"[change source]

Basis for the list[change source]

The most important thing for a list is a to be well defined. For this list, that means "what are the basic standards needed to be on the list?" On that note, I suggest the following guidelines:

  1. All countries should be represented if possible
  2. Each country gets up to 5 representatives. The full 5 would be ideal, but with some countries, we will have problems filling that number.
  3. The entries should be well known for their work in a field of science. Being better known for something else is acceptable as long as they are also well known as a scientist, not just well known and happens to be involved in science in some capacity.
  4. When possible, a variety of fields should be represented. The list is already too heavy in terms of economists.
  5. Variety should be considered for other aspects of the entries such as sex, race, orientation and era but not more-so than pure notability.
  6. Red links are fine to pad out the list but not at the exclusion of articles we have unless the red-link is highly notable (they should already have a page but it could happen..)

These types of lists face many difficulties. Having a firm base to work on, a well defined scope and guidelines for inclusion help a lot. --Creol(talk) 06:18, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think user:Creol's rules are simple enough.--In regard to "red-link scientist": I suggest that we only have that when the country has no "blue-link scientist".--The title of the article says "scientists"; The title does not indicate that people who are more famous as politicians, should be excluded; I am fine with those politicians/scientists not being excluded from this list. 89.8.87.64 (talk) 07:11, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Simple enough?[change source]

I have now [1] moved the Argentine scientists to "List of scientists from Argentina". Simple enough? 89.8.87.64 (talk) 06:50, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No --Creol(talk) 07:04, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]