From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Comment[change source]

I'm not very happy with this article; it really doesn't explain anything about postmodernism. While I don't have time to do anything about that right now, I will start working on this soon. I know of some good published sources that I can get information from. in the meantime, I urge anyone who thinks they have a handle on Postmodernism to work on it a little. Scanna (talk) 18:36, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Ironically, this edit, given by an anonymous IP and later reverted by Isis [it actually looked like vandalism, the IP didn't do a good job of placement], perhaps points to the start of a way forward. 'Post modernism is connected with clutter, technology, no absolutes, and self critique.' This is actually a more accurate statement than what the page says now...basis for new start, anyone? Scanna (talk) 04:51, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Removed paragraph[change source] added this paragraph. "However, the main theme of Cameron’s analysis of semanticist desublimation is a mythopoetical whole. Lyotard uses the term ‘the neodialectic paradigm of expression’ to denote the role of the reader as writer. Thus, the premise of subdialectic patriarchialist theory implies that reality is a legal fiction. Baudrillard promotes the use of the neodialectic paradigm of expression to deconstruct capitalism." Didn't really seem like it belonged. --Terrible Tim (talk) 00:41, 19 July 2008 (UTC)