Talk:Richard Dawkins

This article is about a person who is alive, and so it must follow our rules for biographies of living persons. Controversial content about living persons that does not have any sources or is poorly sourced must be removed straight away from the article and its talk page, especially if it harms their reputation. If such content is repeatedly added to the page or if there are other concerns related to this rule, report it on the Administrators' noticeboard.

What happened to this page... I'm guessing a creationist idiot decided to ruin the page... I lack the wikipedial knowhow to revert the edit, could somebody please do so? Erkekjetter (talk) 20:27, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What problems do you have with the page? In looking at it, I see nothing that stands out as problematic. Also, namecalling is not acceptable on Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia:Assume good faith. Kansan (talk) 20:48, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well for starters one minute I looked at the page and it had many section full of sourced information. The next minute I refreshed it and almost all of it had been deleted and now there is only one source, to test the extent of the vandalism I checked the page for the God Delusion and it had been deleted.I can't think of anybody who would do this besides Creationists Erkekjetter (talk) 20:53, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just looked at the page's edit history, and the page has only been edited once in the past month, and that one edit was somebody adding links to the references on the page (and nothing controversial). You can look at the edit history for yourself here: http://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Richard_Dawkins&action=history Kansan (talk) 20:56, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A. this page has not been edited since March 11, so I find it highly unlikely that this scenario occurred where suddenly things disappeared. This article has never been bigger than it is right now. B. No article has ever existed here on Simple Wikipedia about The God Delusion. Are you sure you're not confusing this with the English Wikipedia? Either way (talk) 20:56, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, I had not realised I was on the simplenglish page. No wonder I needed to make a new account. haha.

Okay, well in the future next time, take a deep breath and make sure you have your facts set so you don't need to name call! Thanks! Either way (talk) 21:02, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Religion Critic[change source]

He's surely critic of religion, but he refused to criticize religions like Hinduism, Buddhism, as he "found no mistakes" in these faiths. But the text here somehow make him look like anti religion, which should be fixed, right? Justicejayant (talk) 09:37, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]