Talk:Shooting of Michael Brown
 | This article contains a translation of Shooting of Michael Brown from en.wikipedia. |
Reversal[change source]
I reverted on these grounds:
- The reference #2 did not deal with the new information, therefore the new information was not supported by a reliable reference.
- I am quite open to the idea that there is much more to this story. However, we can always return to it and change it later. We can't jump ahead of the news! If Brown's police record comes into the public domain in the form of a reliable source (as we define it) then we can reference it.
Patience is a virtue. Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:41, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Once again[change source]
Reference #2 does not support the claim that Brown was a suspect. You cannot make such clams about a person without a supporting source. All we ask is that editors follow our rules: what you write requires support. Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:38, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
Vandalism[change source]
Due to some vandalism as the end of the page I’m forced to post this comment as a warning to the user please do not do that again. I’m not sure who it was but according to the changelog of Wikipedia I saw the name 2604:2000:1384:47B9:2CD6:FBC5:2DEC:209A, so I’m suspecting that person. I’m not sure if you did this 2604:2000:1384:47B9:2CD6:FBC5:2DEC:209A but if you did than please do not do that again. This also goes to any other user on Wikipedia. So now I removed the text. Thanks for your time. Arthurfan828 (talk) 19:44, 26 January 2020 (UTC)