Talk:Tokyo Metro Museum

WAM

Thank you @Prajjwal3959 for the article. Since it's a Japan related article, I think as the founder of this project Japan Wikiproject @つがる they will be able to judge it better, so deferring. Thank you for participating :) Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 12:19, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

@Camouflaged Mirage Thank you so much for reviewing but as much as I know WAM, you are entitled to review it even if it is related to Japan. As I mentioned on the talk page that this article is a manually translated version of its English one and translation is valid under WAM. I have seen hindi translated version of this article under Hindi Wikipedia WAM project, where it was accepted by the organisers without deferring and delegating someone from Japan wikiproject to review it. Just because fountain is not working properly, I can not provide you link of that article. Please reconsider your decision.--Prajjwal3959 (talk) 18:50, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

@Prajjwal3959 Yes I am aware but will like to give them the priority to review for this. Rest assured if it stays unreviewed for sometime I will do the review then. We won't let articles go unreviewed for too long on this wiki :) Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 08:53, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Camouflaged Mirage, Prajjwal3959 Hello, Personally I think there is no effect on who reviews what article. However, as Camouflaged Mirage has mentioned that he would like to give me the priority to review this submission (article) I am okay with that. We (the WAM organizers) will judge all articles fairly, with no bias, from a fair and neutral standpoint. Our knowledge on the subject, or our relationship with the editor of an article, will have zero affect on how we judge the articles (Meaning that any factor won't create a bias in our judging). --Tsugaru let's talk! :) 23:00, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

I did some further copy edits, but yes I will hope for a 2O for this. No leaning to accept / decline here. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 08:40, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Some remarks about this article from me.

• Wasn't too pleased about the capitalisation in the article. Anything in ALL CAPS MAKES IT LOOK LIKE SHOUTING.
• The prose wasn't exactly clear. I had to do some copyediting
• Some of this doesn't seem encyclopedic and belong in Wikivoyage in one of the Tokyo district articles.

I won't get into any further, because I feel I've already criticised enough about this article and don't want to discourage Prajjwal3959 in anyway or form.

However, nevertheless, it's certainly a nice article and good looking article in my opinion. However, I'm not a reviewer nor an organizer or really, I don't have anything to do with WAM (at least not this year because of my busy IRL situation), but this is just some feedback from a random user. SHB2000 (talk) 09:46, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

I mean the CAPS issue can be addressed by putting it into prose. IMO the prose is okay for an article here on simple and we do have some GUIDE content here, there isn't too much policing of NOTGUIDE here. I will say this is a good assessment but I will be easy on the quality of article this year to encourage participation (as mentioned on ST) as the previous years assessment are quite harsh and then it might discourage some to participate. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 11:58, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

+ I will give a note that WAM requires the users to write most of the article, so I will say let's do any changes here on talkpage instead of directly. I usually only do very light c/e in this aspect. I know this is against BOLD which I also don't like but this is WAM rules, hope all can understand :). Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 12:00, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Review

@Camouflaged Mirage@つがる by going through some museum-related articles of simple English and basic wordlist, i have made some improvements to this article. Please review it again.--Prajjwal3959 (talk) 06:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Will defer as I had said. We will get to all articles eventually, please be patient :) Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 09:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

@Camouflaged Mirage@つがる i am waiting for your remarks on this article.--Prajjwal3959 (talk) 09:11, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Yes, I will take a look. Thanks for pinging me --Tsugaru let's talk! :) 02:56, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

"The next section of the museum contains actual simulators which are used to train system employees." this text in which I quoted from the article is still a bit confusing, to a non-english speaker/english learner they may be confused by this, can you change the wording ? Tsugaru let's talk! :) 03:00, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

"In the next section of the museum, there are real simulators. These simulators are used for the training of metro staff." What do you つがる think about it? Prajjwal3959 (talk) 04:16, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Yep, that is better. I will review the article now, you will be notified of the status shortly. --Tsugaru let's talk! :) 20:44, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Sorry I hadn't seen that you didn't make that change to the article yet, once you do I can review it --Tsugaru let's talk! :) 20:46, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

oops..i forgot to do so. I'm soory. Please go for review つがる.--Prajjwal3959 (talk) 06:31, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

 Done Article has been accepted Tsugaru let's talk! :) 21:01, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Thank you Tsugaru. Now i request Camouflaged Mirage to please accept my article and do appropriate changes on fountain. Prajjwal3959 (talk) 04:33, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

@Prajjwal3959 Accepted. Apologies for lateness. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 09:58, 24 December 2021 (UTC)