Talk:Xinjiang

An insult to the very notion of "Simple English"

Quite frankly, it's been some time since I left Simple English precisely because of articles like this, and from what I see, things have gone for the worse. This is in no way written in Simple English. You've totally surrendered to the notion that "short" is the same as "simple", when in fact the language used is far, far too complicated to be considered SE. A long article can be very well written in SE, but a complicated stub like this "article" will always be complicated and uncomprehensible for someone with simple notions of English, no matter what. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.123.134.209 (talk • contribs)

I've simplified it somewhat. Hope it is better now. :) Pmlineditor ∞ 17:38, 9 October 2009 (UTC)