Tonic immobility is a natural state of paralysis that animals enter, often called animal hypnosis. Its function is not certain. It may be related to mating in certain animals like sharks. It may also be a way of avoiding or deterring predators (playing dead is called thanatosis).
Tonic immobility has also been used for the paralysis that often immobilizes animals, such as rodents or birds, when they feel threatened by a predator. Tonic immobility plays a role in survival if it helps a hunted animal to blend in with its surroundings.
Sharks[change | change source]
Some sharks can be placed in a tonic state. The shark remains in this state of paralysis for an average of fifteen minutes before it recovers. Scientists have exploited this phenomenon to study shark behaviour.
Some sharks go into tonic immobility when they are turned upside down. With tiger sharks 3–4 metres (10 to 15 feet) in length, tonic immobility may be achieved by placing hands lightly on the sides of the animal's snout approximate to the general area surrounding its eyes. Scientists believe that tonic immobility in sharks may be related to mating, because female sharks seem more responsive than males. During tonic immobility, the dorsal fin(s) straighten, and both breathing and muscle contractions become more steady and relaxed.
Great White Sharks are not so responsive as other species when tonic immobility has been attempted. In an interesting eye witness case off the coast of California, a female orca was seen holding the shark upside down to induce tonic immobility. It kept the shark still for fifteen minutes, causing it to suffocate to death. This was the first recorded eye witness case of predation on a great white shark in the wild by a species other than humans. Another case of orcas purposely inducing tonic immobility in fish has been seen with stingrays in New Zealand. In this case, the orcas turn themselves upside down before attacking, trap the stingrays in their mouths, then quickly right themselves, in turn flipping the stingray over, inducing the tonic immobility, rendering the fish helpless and an easy meal.
Chicken hypnotism[change | change source]
A chicken can be "hypnotized", or put into a trance, by holding its head down against the ground, and drawing a line along the ground with a stick or a finger, starting at the beak and extending straight outward in front of the chicken. If the chicken is hypnotized in this manner, it will remain immobile for somewhere between 15 seconds and 30 minutes, continuing to stare at the line. One theory is that the trance is caused by fear, which is probably a defensive mechanism intended to feign death, albeit rather poorly.
Methods[change | change source]
Another hypnosis technique is to hold the chicken face up with its back on the ground, and then run a finger downwards from the chicken's wattles to just above its vent. The chicken's feet are exposed, which facilitates the application of medication for foot mites, etc. Clapping hands or giving the chicken a gentle shove will awaken it.
One can also hypnotize a chicken by mimicking how it sleeps – with its head under its wing. In this method, hold the bird firmly, placing its head under its wing, then, gently rock the chicken back and forth and set it very carefully on the ground. It should stay in the same position for about 30 seconds. H.B. Gibson, in his book Hypnosis: its nature and therapeutic uses, says the record period for a chicken remaining in hypnosis is 3 hours 47 minutes.
Trout tickling[change | change source]
Trout tickling is the art of rubbing the underbelly of a trout using fingers. If done properly, the trout will go into a trance-like state after a minute or so, and can then easily be thrown onto the nearest bit of dry land.
Tonic immobility as a scientific tool[change | change source]
The rationale for the tonic immobility test is that the experimenter simulates a predator thereby eliciting an anti-predator response – "death feigning". The precept is that the prey animal 'pretends' to be dead to be able to escape when/if the predator relaxes its concentration. Death feigning birds often take advantage of escape opportunities; tonic immobility in quail reduces the probability of the birds being predated by cats.
To induce tonic immobility, the animal is gently restrained on its side or back for a period of time, e.g. 15 seconds. This is done either on a firm, flat surface or sometimes in a purpose-built ‘V’ or ‘U’-shaped restraining cradle. In rodents, the response is sometimes induced by additionally pinching or attaching a clamp to the skin at the nape of the neck. Scientists record behaviours, such as the number of inductions (15 second restraining periods) required for the animal to remain still, the latency to the first major movements (often cycling motions of the legs), latency to first head or eye movements and the duration of immobility, sometimes called the ‘righting time’.
Tonic immobility has been used to show that hens in cages are more fearful than those in pens. Hens on the top tier of tiered battery cages are more fearful than those on the lower levels. Hens carried by hand are more fearful than hens carried on a mechanical conveyor. Hens transported for longer times are more fearful than those transported for shorter times.
References[change | change source]
- Henningsen A.D. 1994. Tonic immobility in 12 elasmobranchs: use as an aid in captive husbandry. Zoo Biology 13: 325-332 doi:10.1002/zoo.1430130406
- Sharkman. Discovery Channel. 2007. Archived 2018-10-01 at the Wayback Machine
- "The Whale That Ate Jaws". Director: Jonathon Hughes. Nature Untamed. National Geographic Channel. 2009. No. 2, season 6.
- Gallup G.G. Jr. et al 1970. Effect of varying conditions of fear on immobility reactions in domestic chickens (Gallus gullus). Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 73: 442-445
- Gallup G.G. Jr. 1979. Tonic immobility as a measure of fear in the domestic fowl. Animal Behaviour 27: 316-317
- Jones R.B. 1987. Fearfulness of caged laying hens: The effects of cage level and type of roofing. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 17: 171-175
- "Psychosomatic Medicine" (PDF). www.psychosomaticmedicine.org.
- Gilman T.T; Marcuse F.L. & Moore A.U. 1960. Animal hypnosis: a study of the induction of tonic immobility in chickens. Journal of Comparative Physiology and Psychology 43: 99-111
- "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2007-10-09. Retrieved 2013-08-14.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
- "Experimental Animal Hypnosis - Experimental Hypnosis - Hypnotic World". www.hypnoticworld.com.
- Bennett, Oliver (2004-10-24). "HOW TO... Tickle a trout". The Independent. Archived from the original on 2008-06-08. Retrieved 2007-09-06.
- Brian Morgan. Story of the Virgin Soldier (Trout Tickling): Part of the BBC's WWII People's War Series. 12 May 2005. Article ID A4057706. Accessed on: 16-1-07.
- Forkman B. et al 2007. A critical review of fear tests used on cattle, pigs, sheep, poultry and horses. Physiology & Behavior 92: 340-374
- Zamudio S.R. et al 2009. The effects of acute stress and acute corticosterone administration on the immobility response in rats. Brain Research Bulletin 80: 331-336
- Scott G.B. & Moran P. 1993. Fear levels in laying hens carried by hand and by mechanical conveyors. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 36: 337-345
- Cashman P; Nicol C.J. & Jones R.B. 1980. Effects of transportation on the tonic immobility fear reactions of broilers. British Poultry Science 30: 211-221
- Bazovkina D.V. et al 2011. Effects of lipopolysaccharide and interleukin-6 on cataleptic immobility and locomotor activity in mice. Neuroscience Letters 487: 302-304 doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2010.10.043
- Griebel G; Stemmelin J. & Scatton B. 2005. Effects of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist rimonabant in models of emotional reactivity in rodents. Biological Psychiatry, 57: 261-267 doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.10.032
- Donatti A.F. & Leite-Panissi C.R.A. 2011. Activation of corticotropin-releasing factor receptors from the basolateral or central amygdala increases the tonic immobility response in guinea pigs: an innate fear behaviour. Behavioural Brain Research 225: 23-30
- Verwer C.M. et al 2009. Handling effects on body weight and behaviour of group-housed male rabbits in a laboratory setting. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 117: 93-102 doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2008.12.004
- Hessing M.J.C. et al 1994. Individual behavioral and physiological strategies in pigs. Physiology and Behavior 55: 39–46
- V. Holcombe. et al 1979. The immobilization response in rhesus monkey: a behavioral and electroencephalographic study.