User talk:Elite Rhodes

You have been blocked as it says in Wikipedia's blocking policy. If you do not agree with this block, please reply on your talk page by adding, replacing reason with why you think the block is wrong, or send an e-mail to an active administrator in this list. Gwib^-(talk)- 14:27, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why the hell Peter have you deleted my Unblock Message. Please state a valid reason. This is mine and the blocking admins Business and not being rude but please stay out of this--Elite Rhodes (talk) 14:32, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please use the unblock template. Add {{unblock}} below followed by your reason. The text in the block message isn't the place to request it. PeterSymonds (talk) 14:36, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You see and now Gwib isn't replying because he doesn't care he is just abusing his admin powers (Woop de do) and now he is finished with me. well i dont respect that dude!

ANSWER ME!!!! :(--Elite Rhodes (talk) 14:57, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Elite_Rhodes (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)

Request reason:

Because i'm an idiot and am new to Simple wikipedia and wanted to create my own stuff with out intervention but some people had to interupt that because of there certain powers (Woop de do darh) and abuse them on me

Decline reason:

Gwib is a respected administrator. He blocked your account as a vandalism-only one; I am sure he warned you before blocking. Most warning templates link to Wikipedia:Vandalism, a page that describes this problem. You have not shown any concern for the rules and policies here so far, so unless you can explain how this will change when you are unblocked, I see no reason for unblocking; please note that directly attacking other people in this Wikipedia is known as personal attack, and usually also leads to indef ban-- Eptalon (talk) 16:14, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes but none of this would of happened if PeterSydmonds hadn't of interveined

Gwib is correct. See Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Elite Rhodes, User talk:Elite Rhodes/Sandbox, User:Elite Rhodes/Sandbox, and other edits in the history of this page. 'Nuff said. PeterSymonds (talk) 16:19, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No personal attacks is the other link I forgot to post above. --Eptalon (talk) 16:24, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well ok there nothing i can do now so i might aswell die!!!--Elite Rhodes (talk) 09:15, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Me engrish understand not. What mean to word of blocked?194.66.96.132 (talk) 09:17, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Who are you, what, where am i...--Elite Rhodes (talk) 09:18, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Elite_Rhodes (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)

Request reason:

Because i have no valid reason to why i should be blocked. I wanted to have my own userpage and my own edits and somepeople couldn't respect that. So i went on the defensive with PeterSymonds

Decline reason:

Having your own userpage doesn't mean that you can insult people as you please on that page. -- Chenzw Talk 06:31, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes but none of this would of happened if PeterSymonds hadn't of interveined --Elite Rhodes (talk) 10:58, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And how the hell did i insult PeterSymonds. I didn't insult him on my pages OMG!!!--Elite Rhodes (talk) 10:59, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Elite_Rhodes (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)

Request reason:

Yes it's True that i went on the offensive and had to argue with PeterSymonds, but i still no reason why i cannot be unblock. Apart from the excuse that i went on the offensive with him. I'm only defending myself. I have the right to do that

Decline reason:

You have vandalised as well. You have been warned before you were blocked. -- Chenzw Talk 11:45, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Elite_Rhodes (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)

Request reason:

Please Unblock Me from editing Please it has been a few weeks and i want to be able to edit again

Decline reason:

You have vandalized, and were warned. Other administraitors have reviewed and declined this block, and I also decline. Oysterguitarist 01:46, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]