User talk:65.96.48.102

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 2012[change source]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent change appears to have added wrong information and has been removed. If you think the information that you added was correct, please provide a source for the change or discuss it on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Thank you. πr2 23:52, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning[change source]

Well, you can stop trolling now or I can stop you. --Vituzzu (talk) 00:00, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, let's block you. --Vituzzu (talk) 00:02, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

65.96.48.102 (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)


Request reason:

I have not done anything contrary to policy. I am merely correcting inaccurate information on the President's article. The correct info I have put up is common knowledge.

Decline reason:

How about a "It wasn't me" for the next unblock reason? -- Barras (talk) 09:41, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from changing Wikipedia for 72 hours for vandalism.

Once the block has ended you can make helpful changes. Please read Wikipedia's blocking policy and remember that adding spam, making changes that do not have a neutral point of view, making personal attacks on others, not respecting other people's privacy, and vandalizing pages are not allowed. If you do any of these things, you will be blocked again.

If you think this block is unfair, you can ask to be unblocked by adding {{Unblock|your reason here}} below. If you cannot do this or the reason is private please send an e-mail to simple-admins-l@lists.wikimedia.org and an administrator will look at your reason and reply. You may want to read our guide to unblock requests before asking to be unblocked. DJSasso (talk) 20:05, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

65.96.48.102 (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)


Request reason:

My information is correct and I even provided a citation on the talk page for it. Please unblock me.

Decline reason:

Per below. -- Orashmatash (talk) 23:49, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It has only been established by the liberal media to cover him up. You know that well. Thank you.

I am editing from a neutral point of view and a level head. You and the other editors are not being neutral, as proven by a partner Wiki's page here: http://www.conservapedia.com/Examples_of_Bias_in_Wikipedia. Thank you.

  • You call that website "neutral"?? Who's likely to be wrong: Several very experienced users or you? If you don't stop this nonsense, I will ask an admin to not allow you to change this page (you already can't now). Put simply, it's your point of view you are trying to push on the article on Obama. No-one else agrees with it, so it will stay out of the article.Jasper Deng (talk) 20:26, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]