User talk:97.87.29.188

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to our small wiki. I need to give you a bit of advice: Try and make sure that changes to articles are actually improvements. For instance, it does nor improve an article if you take out a red link. They serve to indicate where we need a new article of a dictionary definition. regards, Macdonald-ross (talk) 21:10, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why haven't the articles already been created? If they will when will they? Who determines what "need"'s to be created? Would I be one of those people? 97.87.29.188 (talk) 21:51, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you can be one of those people. If there is an article that needs to be made, keep the redlink so that when the page is created, the original article will already link to it. If you definitely think there is no need for the new article, take the link out. Otherwise you can create the article if you have some knowledge of the topic. It takes time to create articles, and sometimes when we get in 3 links deep, we forget about redlinked articles on the article we started with. BTW, it looks like you're an active user, you can easily create a username and make it easier for us to remember who you are on talk pages and such. Thanks. Nerfer (talk) 05:48, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
How is it not improving an article if no article is being (or has been created) for a red link? The red is annoying to see? On Wikipedia:Red link "Very good articles should have no red links, because they link to pages that do not exist, and should first be created.", even more so on en:Wikipedia:Red link. 97.87.29.188 (talk) 21:05, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]