User talk:Analysis Retentivus

No, I'm not a Herbal Fascist even though I Make The Trains run on Thyme.

Please Return to Simple English Wikipedia[change source]

Hello, Analysis Retentivus! We at Simple English Wikipedia would like to invite you to return to being the valued editor that you once were here. Simple English Wikipedia is a thriving and useful Wikimedia project that has grown to include over 55,000 articles. Whatever the reasons why you left, we'd like you to consider returning to our community. Simple English Wikipedia is a closely knit community where editors get to know each other and act as a real community. We would like to invite you to take a look at what we've become! Thank you for your former contributions to our project and please consider rejoining our family! Thank you! Analysis Retentivus (talk) 03:31, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Question[change source]

The username you have linked to at en:User:Bride of Essjay doesn't exist there. Can you please explain why you have linked your account here to that user, and can you further explain what you hope to achieve with the above welcome back message (that is intended to be used on other projects)? Thanks fr33kman ^talk 04:04, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Answer 1. It was a test.

Answer 2. It was a test.

Answer 3. Not without the marmalade. Analysis Retentivus (talk) 06:03, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. It was not a complaint, merely a query. fr33kman ^talk 22:20, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[change source]

You have been blocked indefinitely from changing Wikipedia in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of changing privileges. If you believe this block is unfair you may request to be unblocked by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. You may want to consider reading our guide to unblock requests before requesting to be unblocked.

--Exert 22:35, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I endorse this block because this user has obviously been trolling and their efforts have caused disruption to the project. Among their first actions here was a drive-by oppose in an RFA of a person they have had conflict with at Commons. This is clear evidence of disruption and trolling, as is their contribution history which shows no positive edits to the projects aims and disputes with other editors that they have followed from Commons to simpleWP. fr33kman ^talk 22:42, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What he said ^ Promethean (talk) 23:31, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Blocked for mentioning an obvious copyright violation. Please never unblock me! And good luck with your unique interpretations of copyright law Analysis Retentivus (talk) 09:41, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your are a sock puppet or a troll, both should be blocked. I fully agree with the block decision. Barras (talk) 09:48, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for watching my talkpage Barras.

Analysis Retentivus (talk) 09:51, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]