User talk:BRPever/Archives/2021

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


15:42, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

16:09, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

block

hello why did you block me? Lsolarisl (talk) 22:46, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it wasn’t massage for you Lsolarisl (talk) 22:49, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

18:30, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

22:38, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

17:41, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

17:55, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Block

Hi! Sorry for the delay, I wanted to reply but I simply forgot; ironically, the tab remained open on my browser so I could replay and I simply forgot. As for the user in question, a user at the project has informed us that @Quakewoody: had been blocked indefinitely on more than one Wikipedia, which was further affirmed by a trusted user from our project (@Zblace:). In his comment, the latter stated that the user met the criteria for a global ban (which explains my explanation for the block) and suggested that he be blocked on our project as well due to the fact that he has demonstrated "unconstructive, discriminating, and suppressive editing" ("nekonstruktivnom, diskriminirajućem i supresivnom editiranju"), which I agreed with. He has been blocked on our project because I agreed with the evaluation; the user has targeted minority groups and had disruptive edits on our project which go against the policy of tolerance we adhere to. Also, the user doesn't even speak Serbo-Croatian and it seemed that his only goal for coming to our project was to disrupt the discussion and express his anti-LGBT sentiments. Users have been blocked such reasons on our project before, as we do not tolerate such behaviour. The "global ban" in the rationale seems to be an error from my side, as I thought - at the time - that he had already been blocked globally ba the individual Wikis but did not receive a global ban from Meta, despite meeting the conditions. The rationale is a mistake from my side, but I do not think that the user has constructive and non-disrupting intentions on our project, which is why I think that the block is valid.

If you think it an error, I am more than happy to reconsider my decision. One again, I apologize for the delay! --Edgar Allan Poe (talk) 11:55, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My colleague has, in the meantime, intervened and unblocked the user. I shan't contest that decision as I trust his judgement in any case. I hope this clears things up :) --Edgar Allan Poe (talk) 12:37, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

00:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC)


19:08, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

17:51, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

23:23, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

16:53, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

17:31, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

19:41, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

16:49, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Block Vandal

Dear BRPever,

Can you temp block this user for vandal-like behavior? https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/47.7.236.69

Blessings,

Yaakov W.Yaakov Wa. (talk) 02:01, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done by another admin. :)-BRP ever 02:08, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

21:25, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

15:43, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

15:10, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

13:49, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

17:07, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

17:06, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

20:03, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

20:26, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

15:49, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

16:32, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

17:33, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Invitation

Hello BRPever, I Space chinedu would like to invite you to join WikiProject geography because I can see you love editing and creating articles about geologic features in Nepal. If you think that you don't want to join think about it and let me know your decision Space chinedu (talk) 08:22, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

15:32, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

IKDHV

[[https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sandbox]] Ulises142 (talk) 17:03, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ulises142: is there anything that I can help you with?-BRP ever 00:34, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

21:11, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

20:47, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

16:21, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

19:28, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

21:59, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Read-only reminder

A maintenance operation will be performed on Wednesday August 25 06:00 UTC. It should only last for a few minutes.

This will affect your wiki as well as 11 other wikis. During this time, publishing edits will not be possible.

Also during this time, operations on the CentralAuth will not be possible (GlobalRenames, changing/confirming e-mail addresses, logging into new wikis, password changes).

For more details about the operation and on all impacted services, please check on Phabricator.

A banner will be displayed 30 minutes before the operation.

Please help your community to be aware of this maintenance operation. Thank you!

20:35, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

16:02, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

15:20, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

15:36, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

18:32, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

22:23, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

16:33, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Temporary protection request

Hello.

User:My name is CJ who is the same IP 212.108.146.62/185.135.96.2 who was warned numerous times and temporarily blocked a few times for vandalism by the administrators, is vandalizing the same articles in the same pattern under his/her new account which he/she opened on October 1, by erasing NPOV content, also sources, and is replacing them with nationalistic POV content. This person will continue with his/her disruptive edits, despite being warned and temporarily blocked as an IP user.

Nothing will stop and deter this person, unless these articles that are vandalized are temporarily protected and he/she is temporarily blocked for a much longer period.

Yours sincerely, Multituberculata (talk) 16:41, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

15:31, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

20:54, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Page to be deleted - Obvious advertising

Good morning,

I wanted to report the following page:

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fabio_Raffaeli

This is blatant advertising, the entry is not encyclopaedic and a user (Allensyllos) keeps removing the quick deletion request. The character on the page in question is self-promoting for his real estate business in Dubai, any source given is self-promotional. He is blatantly doing this to legitimise his position for promotional purposes.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Eikeran (talkcontribs) 08:13, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

20:08, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Verify

Hi, BRPever, could you please verify your Lira.Chat usernames here on your talkpage? I see 2 of them on Libra.Chat... Tsugaru let's talk! :) 00:57, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Both are me. They are grouped nick, you can check their information to verify.-BRP ever 01:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks. I did see the cloaks, but I just wanted to be safe and double check :) --Tsugaru let's talk! :) 01:02, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

20:28, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

VGA & GA comments

Hye BRPever, I was wondering if you can give my GA noms for Jacinda Ardern & Willis Tower a look for more comments or VGA noms of Jackie Kennedy and Jimmy Carter thank you! They haven't gotten much feedback in a bit. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 01:58, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will take a look and comment soon. Thanks :)- BRP ever 02:01, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello, please article F.C. Nassaji Mazandaran, which has articles in other languages, and link to the wiki data item. Thanks Viera iran (talk) 09:30, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Viera iran I have linked the article to other languages. Thanks-BRP ever 12:03, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RfDs

Thanks for finding so many articles of questionable notability. I have a couple of questions.

  1. I notice that many of your nominations seem to be in alphabetical order. Are you browsing any particular categories looking for RfD candidates?
  2. Are you by any chance monitoring categories your nominations are in so that we can delete any that become underpopulated or empty? If not, would whatever your process is lend itself to such monitoring? I know the categories that become empty would show up in empty categories, but we might want to do something with ones that become underpopulated, depending on which ones they are.

Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 08:30, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Auntof6:, I am checking all the pages on topics that do not have interwiki links to the major projects (based on wikidata site-links). And whenever I come across pages created as part of Undisclosed paid editing or paid promotion, I go through the user's history and the history of their sock accounts.
I am not checking the categories in detail as the lists are very long, but I have noticed most of the pages appear to have general categories (which are usually populated). In the contributions of all the single-purpose accounts I have checked, none of them have created any categories for the pages they created. And for cases like this one, I mention that in RFD. Thanks :) -BRP ever 08:50, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm finding it exhausting. We went from 3 or 4 per day to 100 or so. Can we perhaps space these out a bit better? Blissyu2 (talk) 01:25, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We already have a massive list of promotional article. It's better to get rid of them as fast as possible. BRP ever 01:28, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, and if I click at least one blue links in this thread, I probably will not be far away from finding several promotional articles - crawling out from under a rock! I have Good Faith in the ability of wikipedia to get rid of many more promotional articles. Regards! 89.8.77.16 (talk) 03:40, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I did click, and this link [141] shows my first catch of the day. 89.8.77.16 (talk) 03:50, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note that some pages there are the ones with questionable notability, or COI issues, which I thought should be discussed. But yeah, many of the pages there are created for promotional purposes. They believe that it's "easier to spam" because there are "very less reviews". Thanks - BRP ever 04:06, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

20:37, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

The aftermath of the George Reeves situation

Yesterday you had been involved in repairing serious vandalism involving the George Reeves article. So far, every vandalising IP has been blocked, with the exception of 45.245.8.213 and 154.182.50.40. Should they also be blocked for block evasion, or is it not that much of a deal now due to the article's protected status? 209.232.149.23 (talk) 16:29, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

22:07, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

WHYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

WHY DID YOU DELETED KICK THE BUDDY PAGE! WHY DID YOU TALKING ABOUT THE PAGE IS ABOUT A PERSON!!! Bakhos2010 (talk) 05:16, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Bakhos2010, I deleted the page because there was no claim of notability. Please check WP:N to know about wikipedia's notability policy, and for why I deleted it, please check WP:QD. Thanks BRP ever 06:12, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

20:03, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

21:15, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

21:59, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

About deletion

Sir! Do I have the right to request to delete an article I created at any time? Haoreima (talk) 11:48, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Haoreima Hello, in case of the page you recently blanked, other users have made contribution to the page. And it doesn't look like it was created by a mistake based on how the earlier RFD discussion went. Page can only be deleted as author's request 'if most of the page was written by that author and was created as a mistake'. Thanks BRP ever 11:56, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
May I nominate Ethoi Oinam for qd? Because some people are using it as reference to some RFDs! Like one in Priyakanta Laishram. I don't feel nice at such mentions! Haoreima (talk) 12:06, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please wait till the RFD is over. The page, as it is, doesn't meet our QD criteria.-- BRP ever 12:10, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

22:27, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

22:06, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Happy holidays

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message
Thanks @Ferien: and happy holidays to you too. Thank you for your good work throughout the years :) -BRP ever 21:37, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays too

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Take care and stay safe BRPever, thanks for all you had put into. :) Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:07, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Camouflaged Mirage Happy holidays to you too :) And lots of thanks for all your hard work despite all the troubles. I know this wasn't the best year for any of us, but it's finally coming to an end. Let's hope the upcoming one turns out to be a better one.-BRP ever 13:34, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]