User talk:CRRaysHead90

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
    CRRaysHead90    
Carlos Pena
usersandboxemailmore
Welcome to my Talk page!
Welcome to my talk page. Feel free to leave me a message and I will reply here. You can click "Add topic" to start a new thread. Please leave English Wikipedia problems on my talk page there. Have a nice day!
Talk Archives
12345678910111213141516



WP:ANI[change | edit source]

Notifying you of my starting a discussion at WP:ANI regarding your conduct. Normandy 11:01, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

In response to your question here, yes I was retired. But I came back after several users encouraged me to offwiki in private and a couple said what I did was an off wiki issue and thus cannot be banned for it on wiki. So I am back, I'm not hiding any longer. I'd like to add when I told a couple users I had returned I was met with "yays". I've already apologized and meant it, it was a dumb mistake. We all make them. Any further action I feel is wasting the community's time. Good day. CRRaysHead90 | We Believe! 11:26, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
You are in violation of WP:NPA. You can be blocked for PAs on or off wiki. Normandy 11:35, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
I disagree that that was a personal attack. It was a joke, it was not an attack of any kind. And if the community agrees that it was, which I doubt, it is still the first personal attack and thus not bannable yet, it is temporarily blockable though. Again though, this is moot as I have already apologized to the user. If he chooses not to accept that apology, that's his choice, but the fact remains I admitted my error and am ready to move on. CRRaysHead90 | We Believe! 11:41, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Where is the community agreement that it was a joke? The discussion I saw was the community very much upset by it. I know I thought it was a very big personal attack. I would have blocked you for it immediately to be frank had I seen it before you had already announced retirement. I expected you to be mature enough to stay away when you said you would so I didn't block. If you are back I will likely block you since part of your unblock last time was that you would be reblocked if there was even one issue. And clearly this is an issue. -DJSasso (talk) 12:47, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks[change | edit source]

Dear CRRaysHead90, thank you for your critique on the use of my vote and the efficiency levels of voicing of my opinion on WP:ANI. I have taken your opinion into consideration and I have issued a further comment on this issue and trust that it will be of satisfaction. Kindest regards, Kennedy (talk) 08:55, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

I've not been active recently, so take this as you will, however I find that sarcastic comment seriously mean spirited. You don't respond to a good faith comment with this crap.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 01:12, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Good faith? Talking of good faith... Kennedy (talk) 14:05, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
You only assume good faith until given a reason not to. A nasty sarcastic comment that you know will only inflame the situation is not a comment posted in good faith. Sorry, but I have no patience for this. If you disagree with CRRaysHead asking for an explained answer, tell him that. That is good faith. Posting stuff like this is not, and I certainly don't appreciate it.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 17:37, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

RfD alert[change | edit source]

Hey there. Some templates you created have been nominated for deletion here. Osiris (talk) 12:03, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the notice, however since I wasn't active at the time I never got to participate. Which sucks because I would have opposed. CRRaysHead90 | Get Some! 07:52, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
Well you could list it at deletion review. Why would you have opposed? Osiris (talk) 08:13, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
Wow I can't believe I missed that one too...would have kept atleast one of them as well. -DJSasso (talk) 11:26, 18 September 2012 (UTC)