User talk:Chenzw/Archives/May 2016

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
This is a Wikipedia user talk page.

If you find this page on a site that is not Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. The page may be old and the owner of this page may not have a relationship with sites that are not Wikipedia. The original page is located at http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Chenzw/Archives/May_2016.

Wikimedia Foundation
Wikimedia Foundation
This is the User talk page for Chenzw, where you can send messages and comments to Chenzw.


Re: link change on simple.wikipedia[change source]

Didn't realize I was on simple.wiki. Will re-creating a page from English Wiki content on Simple (according to Simple guidelines) be appropriate course of action instead of linking? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Стопервый (talkcontribs)

Yes, please feel free to. Chenzw  Talk  06:29, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[change source]

Hi, I left my own reply at my user talkpage, you can remove this message at anytime.GTX (talk) 06:42, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Signature[change source]

== Signature == Hey Chenzw how do u make a good signature. Maybe after commenting on a person's talk page right below it, it shows your username right? So how do u make a more unique one. Trunzep 13:55, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One way is to use colours or different fonts. This requires an understanding of HTML. The steps for configuring a custom signature can be found on this page. Chenzw  Talk  15:53, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Chenzw:

I've noticed a little uptick in vandalism on the Israel article. It's not a ton, of course, but Israel's Independence Day (Yom Ha'atzmaut) is a week from Thursday. I wonder if we shouldn't semiprotect just for a couple of weeks. StevenJ81 (talk) 21:31, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, as of right now there is not enough recent vandalism for a page protection. That said, I have added the page to my watchlist, and will protect once the vandalism becomes more prevalent. Chenzw  Talk  22:42, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 2 May 2016[change source]

Talkback[change source]

Hi, you have a new replies on my talkpage. You can remove this message at anytime.GTX (talk) 06:28, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail![change source]

Hello, Chenzw. You have a new email! Please check it at your convenience.
Message added 06:36, 2 May 2016 (UTC). You can take off this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

Auntof6 (talk) 06:36, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[change source]

Hi, I have reply on GTX1975's talkpage, you can remove this message at anytime.GTX (talk) 06:42, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have left my reply on my talkpage again.GTX (talk) 06:53, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A new reply on my talkpage again.GTX (talk) 06:59, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User still Never Learnt[change source]

Hi, I saw you revert the page, User talk:Macdonald-ross right? This user still vanadalize againGTX (talk) 07:02, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Binbooo[change source]

I think that this user is representing a company, based on their user page. Can you look into it and take appropriate action if needed. Thanks. The Newspaper (talk) 12:01, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for informing me! I have blocked the editor. Chenzw  Talk  14:00, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

20:09, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Bot not emergency shutoff-compliant?[change source]

Forgive me if this is a stupid question, but why is ChenzwBot not shutoff-compliant? There seems to be a big button in the middle of the page labeled "Emergency shutoff." which I presume shuts off the bot. Hobbes Novakoff (talk) 02:42, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That is actually just a link to block the bot from editing. Shutoff-compliance requires another way to inform the bot to shutdown, and for the bot to respect that command and stop whatever it is doing cleanly. Chenzw  Talk  03:53, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ah. I see. Thanks. Hobbes Novakoff (talk) 15:36, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[change source]

Thanks for shutting off that bit of annoyance. Etamni | ✉   15:34, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks as well, that user was very troublesome. Lolcats20 (talk) 15:35, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No problem! :) Chenzw  Talk  15:37, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

regarding article[change source]

The original writings of Josephus, one in the Smithsonian and the one in the musuem in England, both state clearly Jesus was born in 2 BC, the copies in print and available the past 400+ years have it incorrect ly printed in the copies as 4BC. 2 BC makes sense following that date with the scriptures, and His childhood, Jesus was born in mid September according to various reliable sources., but 2BC was the year according to Josephus's original writing. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.175.60.69 (talkcontribs)

Sorry, I am not sure what you are talking about. If you are disputing the content of an existing article, please feel free to change it, or at least give me a link to the article in question. Chenzw  Talk  02:27, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[change source]

Hello, Chenzw. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback.
Message added 02:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Music1201 (talk) 02:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback[change source]

I don't suppose you'd reconsider...? Neither of those users you just granted rollback to has many edits here, and most don't seem vandalism-related. --Auntof6 (talk) 03:14, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will email you about this matter, please hold on a bit. Chenzw  Talk  03:16, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

23:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Request for Rollback[change source]

I made a request for rollback and I was hoping that either you or another administrator could respond to it. The Newspaper (talk) 15:48, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The point of checkuser towards me?[change source]

Why is it that you're reviewing me for checkuser? I tagged Blue's Clues for having too many red links, how is it dubious? Dr. Neurosis (talk) 18:09, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Subnautica which year Category[change source]

I would like to add the tag of 20** video game, but I do not know which one to use on Subnautica, it came out as early access in 2014, but will be fully released in 2016, do I use 2014 video game or 2016 video game? Lolcats20 (talk) 15:35, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please use 2016. The release date should be based on the date of general release to the public. Chenzw  Talk  15:41, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

rise against being Chicago scene[change source]

Hi i strongly believe that rise against is more in the Chicago punk scene and should be could rise against is a Chicago based punk rock band not rise against is american melodic hardcore band.--Ultimatefighter93 (talk) 10:15, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail![change source]

Hello, Chenzw. You have a new email! Please check it at your convenience.
Message added 15:02, 13 May 2016 (UTC). You can take off this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

Oluwa2Chainz (talk) 15:02, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Settled :) Chenzw  Talk  15:05, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Much appreciated. --Oluwa2Chainz (talk) 15:10, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2015-16 Premier league season[change source]

Hi, I recently updated the 2015-16 Premier league season in Simple English and I believe you have changed it back. That took me a while to do and it was genuine information I was adding, not vandalism.

Regards, LewisWalters — Preceding unsigned comment added by LewisWalters (talkcontribs)

Just to dip my toes in the water, if I put a request for rollback, would I possibly get it? Etimena (talk) 19:56, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

At this point of time, you would probably be unsuccessful. My advice is to continue doing what you have been doing (you are doing a good job!), and consider applying after 2 or so weeks. Chenzw  Talk  02:34, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

rise against being Chicago scene[change source]

I strongly believe that rise against should rise against is a Chicago based punk rock band not rise against is american melodic hardcore band. P.S it sounds better --Blink 98 (talk) 23:42, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

rise against being Chicago scene[change source]

I believe that rise against is Chicago based punk rock band not rise against is american melodic hardcore band. P.S it sounds better--Blink 98 (talk) 23:50, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

16:01, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 May 2016[change source]

You've got mail[change source]

Hello, Chenzw. You have a new email! Please check it at your convenience.
You can take off this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

Oluwa2Chainz (talk) 19:00, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

rise against being in Chicago scene[change source]

I strongly believe that rise against is both standard punk rock and that they standard Chicago punk rock natives and i also believe that rise against should be could rise against is a Chicago - punk rock band--Skull 22 (talk) 01:05, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kind of confused.[change source]

Hello. I am doing this on my phone (out of pure desperation) and am not sure how it will turn out. Alas. What exactlyis your problem? Im not doing anything wrong. Im contributing to si.ple wikipedia which is kind of the whole point of the site is it not?! I would have said this on my talk page but as you blocked me obviously i can't. I feel this is almost personal now. I am a person you know? The Noailles pages i made are relevant and useful as well as good. I just dont get this. Its silly now. 89.243.44.45 (talk) 16:55, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are not allowed to edit, ever, as long as there is an outstanding block against you. You are not allowed to edit even while logged out. To request unblock, either use the {{unblock}} template or email the administrators at simple-admins-l@lists.wikimedia.org. Chenzw  Talk  02:07, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


I have requested an unblock three times in the past week. Yet had no response. Im sure youd understand that is a tiny bit frustrating ie feeling totally ignored. Please just be of some help. :/ 2.97.229.35 (talk) 11:09, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any unblock request anywhere. Unblock requests must be initiated by {{unblock}}, and not by editing articles. Chenzw  Talk  11:31, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Again. You are not listening to me. I cannot edit my own talk page can I. Due to someone (I forget the name) spitefully snatching that away from me. Hence anonymous IP addresses. I'll say it again to make sure it is emphasised. I cannot edit my own talk page in order to put the unblock template there. Please just help me. I don't want to feel like a begging 6 year old.

AND as I have also said I've emailed the email you offered and have had nothing back. What am I supposed to do rather than directly contact a person who is supposed to help others.

92.24.35.154 (talk) 15:27, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As I said, unblock requests must be initiated by {{unblock}}, and not by editing articles. If you really want to request unblock and don't want to have the privilege of editing your own talk page removed, then you'd best only edit your own talk page, and nothing else. Chenzw  Talk  16:00, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


But that is the point. I can't edit my OWN talk page in order to ASK TO BE UNBLOCKED. That ability was ripped away from me. And as I said I emailed that address you gave me and had nothing back. What am I supposed to do? Considering I've done little wrong except edit pasges of a website that claims to be for everyone? Why am I being punished? I just require a tiny bit of help. 92.24.41.198 (talk) 10:47, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Are you trying to tell me that while logged out, you can't edit the user talk page of your IP address? Because it seems that you are perfectly able to leave messages on other editors' talk pages, and even able to edit articles. Since your previous two accounts were globally locked (which as administrators over here, we have no control over the locking/unlocking process), leave your unblock request on your own IP's talk page. Chenzw  Talk  12:40, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Chenzw. You have new messages at User:PokestarFan/sandbox/List of Ancient Greek Philosphers.
Message added 01:27, 21 May 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

PokestarFan (talk) (My Contribs) 01:27, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

18:40, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Greetings. Blocked or not the edit I made on Marie Christine de Rouvroy's page was and is perfectly valid as well as useful. Don't be a vandal. You are an admin are you not? Do you make a habit of reverting perfectly constructive edits of others? Don't be spiteful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.229.42.189 (talkcontribs)

You seem to be mistaken here. Your privilege to edit has been removed. If you are evading your block, policy allows for all edits which you make thereafter to be reverted. If you are serious on contributing, request for an unblock first. Chenzw  Talk  01:55, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 28 May 2016[change source]

The Scream and The Scream (1893)[change source]

Hi! These articles (The Scream and The Scream (1893))refers to the same task. I' ve merge them but your bot reverted my edit. Could you please fix it? Thanks!--Pavlos1988 (talk) 20:53, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavlos1988: These articles are supposed to be for different things, but I messed them up when I moved one over the other before I understood that. I don't know how to retrieve the former content of The Scream, but maybe Chenzw can help me with that. --Auntof6 (talk) 21:07, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done, I have fixed the page histories. @Auntof6: The Scream is still an article about the painting, by the way. Chenzw  Talk  02:01, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It is? The person who pointed out that I had messed it up said that The Scream was about the series of paintings that the artist did with the same name. --Auntof6 (talk) 02:09, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have reworded some parts of the article to make this clearer. Chenzw  Talk  02:16, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 02:48, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

16:18, 30 May 2016 (UTC)