User talk:Chenzw/Archives/Sep 2012

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
This is a Wikipedia user talk page.

If you find this page on a site that is not Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. The page may be old and the owner of this page may not have a relationship with sites that are not Wikipedia. The original page is located at http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Chenzw/Archives/Sep_2012.

Wikimedia Foundation
Wikimedia Foundation
This is the User talk page for Chenzw, where you can send messages and comments to Chenzw.


Blocking ‎93.93.222.210[change source]

Did you block this IP address: ‎93.93.222.210 because you deleted my request on WP:VIP?Receptie123 (talk) 14:20, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, I did. A range of IP addresses was blocked because the vandalism was originating from a school network (so you would see 93.93.222.192/27 in the block log). Chenzw  Talk  14:22, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok.Thank you.Receptie123 (talk) 14:22, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong reverts[change source]

Today I've been a bit tired and did some wrong reverts and changes.I am very sorry.I didn't mean to do them,so don't think i was trying to vandalize Wikipedia.Sorry again.Best Wishes.Receptie123 (talk) 18:13, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[change source]

The Admin's Barnstar
For your great admin work on Simple English Wikipedia.Your are one of the best contributors of Simple English Wikipedia. Receptie123 (talk) 16:21, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! :D Chenzw  Talk  16:22, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts[change source]

Why did you revert something on my talk page and then reverted it back?Receptie123 (talk) 16:29, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The initial revert was a mistake. The second rollback was a reversion of that mistake. My apologies. Chenzw  Talk  16:29, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No problem,i just wanted to know.I saw that the second edit was a revision.Receptie123 (talk) 16:32, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wheatland, Iowa[change source]

I didn't see the content of this page, but I thought the rule of thumb was that cities, towns, etc. are always considered notable. Is that not the rule any more? --Auntof6 (talk) 15:09, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The content of the article is as follows:
Wheatland Iowa, A town Iowa, Small, It has a school, and that about it, maybe the waterpower,
any way its really important town in iowa, I live here, so yea thats about it.
Cities and towns by themselves are notable, but if an article does not attempt to address (or prove) its notability, it is deletable content under QD A4. Chenzw  Talk  15:19, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Makes sense, thanks! --Auntof6 (talk) 15:29, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
That is not true. Towns and cities are always notable, they cannot be deleted via QD. -DJSasso (talk) 19:34, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chen. Hope you're going okay. I forgot to mention earlier that I linked to one of your decisions - here today. I hope that's okay...? Osiris (talk) 08:43, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's okay. I was wanting to weigh in on the discussion, but haven't gotten much time yet to review all of the existing guidelines and community consensus. I will get that done this weekend. Chenzw  Talk  08:47, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent. Thanks. Osiris (talk) 08:48, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]