Jump to content

User talk:Davey2010

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 days ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic Tech News: 2026-06
Dashboard
RFA / RFB / RFC / RFO / Removal of rights
Current requests for adminship
None at this time
Current requests for bureaucratship
None at this time
Current requests for checkusership
None at this time
Current requests for oversightership
None at this time
Current requests for removal of rights
None at this time
Purge
DISCOGRAPHY
ArticleENNext update
Chvrches discography
EN
18
Sep
2024
Eminem albums discography
EN
Sash! discography
EN
N-Dubz discography
EN
Eminem singles discography
EN
Demi Lovato discography
EN
List of songs recorded by Demi Lovato
EN
Charli XCX discography
EN
List of songs written by Charli XCX
EN
Robbie Williams discography
EN
List of songs recorded by Robbie Williams
EN
Madison Beer discography
EN
Justin Bieber discography
EN
Nicki Minaj discography
EN
Daddy Yankee discography
EN
ASAP Rocky discography
EN
Iggy Azalea discography
EN
List of songs recorded by Iggy Azalea
EN
Katy Perry discography
EN
List of songs recorded by Katy Perry
EN
Ludacris discography
EN
Chamillionaire discography
EN
Ariana Grande discography
EN
List of songs recorded by Ariana Grande ‎
EN
Ariana Grande videography
EN
List of Ariana Grande live performances
EN
List of awards and nominations received by Ariana Grande
EN
Soulja Boy discography
EN
Flo Rida discography
EN
List of awards and nominations received by Charli XCX
EN
Billie Eilish discography
EN
List of songs recorded by Billie Eilish
EN
Kesha discography
EN
List of songs recorded by Kesha
EN
Kesha videography
EN
List of awards and nominations received by Kesha
EN
The Sisters of Mercy discography
EN
Becky G videography
EN
Becky G discography
EN
List of songs recorded by Becky G
EN
List of Becky G live performances
EN
edit
AVN AWARDS
ArticleENNext update
AVN Award for Best Actor
EN
18
Sep
2024
AVN Award for Best Actress
EN
AVN Award for Best Supporting Actor
EN
AVN Award for Best Supporting Actress
EN
AVN Award for Female Foreign Performer of the Year
EN
AVN Award for Female Performer of the Year
EN
List of members of the AVN Hall of Fame
EN
AVN Award for Male Foreign Performer of the Year
EN
AVN Award for Male Performer of the Year
EN
AVN Award for Transgender Performer of the Year
EN
edit
Codes: (edit)

{{reflist|refs=
}}

|

{{enwp based|url=}}

{{noping|}}

<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #EDEAFF; padding: 0px 10px 0px 10px; border: 1px solid #8779DD;">
:''The following discussion is closed. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.''
----
{{deleted|}} ~~~~
----
:''The above discussion is preserved as an [[Help:Archiving a talk page|archive]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not change it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.''</div>


== Notes to self ==

Notes to self

[change source]
  1. Beyoncé#Discography - create seperate discogs

Flood flag automatically expires

[change source]

Note to self : Flood flag automatically expires.

TalkpageNotes

[change source]
  • ==== Nob prize - people ====

Nob prize - companies

[change source]
- do this at the end once Nob prize for people have been done

AI slop

[change source]

Category:Marvel Cinematic Universe characters

Simple Talk

[change source]

Wikipedia:Simple_talk#Deprecating_Template:Nobelprize_proposal -
unknown has ended (refresh)

Schools

[change source]

Populate Category:Lists of schools in South East England (en) - create school articles

Populate Category:Lists of schools in England (en) - create school articles

Update all navboxes at Category:Lists of schools in South East England - . –Davey2010Talk 20:03, 25 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Create lists at Lists of schools in the United KingdomDavey2010Talk 21:37, 1 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Spam websites and spam IPs Docs

[change source]

IPs Vandals Doc

[change source]

IPs Vandals Doc - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iWGGy1CtMGO_opYgjvqgfI-ptXYt_xkAHBjlkrckCb4/editDavey2010Talk 10:58, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Check IP edits

[change source]

Check IP edits

WPCleaner notes

[change source]

Wikimedia dumps

[change source]

Users appear to add dump logs from whereever to WPCleaner - check check.wi last update. –Davey2010Talk 15:08, 24 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Category:Accessibility issue tracking categories

[change source]

Category:Accessibility issue tracking categories

Special:LintErrors/bogus-image-options

[change source]

Special:LintErrors/bogus-image-optionsDavey2010Talk 14:53, 7 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:LintErrors/obsolete-tag?wpNamespaceRestrictions=0&titlecategorysearch=&exactmatch=1&tag=center&template=allDavey2010Talk 17:39, 25 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Bus cat

[change source]
Dennis Specialist Vehicles
Dennis Dominator
Dennis Domino
Dennis Dorchester
Dennis Dragon
Dennis Falcon
Dennis Jubilant
Dennis Lance
Dennis Loline
^ needs creating

East Lancs

[change source]
Mercedes-Benz Cito
Mercedes-Benz L 319
Mercedes-Benz Tourrider
Mercedes-Benz O302
Mercedes-Benz O303
Mercedes-Benz O305
Mercedes-Benz O370
Mercedes-Benz O371
Mercedes-Benz O404
Mercedes-Benz OC 500 LE
Mercedes-Benz Tourismo
Mercedes-Benz Viano
Mercedes-Benz Vito
^ needs creating

Plaxton

[change source]
Plaxton Paramount
Viewmaster
^ needs creating

Renault

[change source]
Renault Trucks
Irisbus Agora - update
Renault FR1 - update
Renault PR100.3
Renault PR180
Renault PR100
Renault R212
Renault R312
Renault Tracer - update

Optare / Switch

[change source]

Wrightbus

[change source]
  • Category:Wrightbus buses yellow tickY All models there - ENL Contour moved to Contour (body) as new model being launched 2026 17 March 2025
IMPORTANT NOTE
[change source]
make sure all buses have chassis, manufacturer, single-decked, step/low-floor entrance all linked/ –Davey2010Talk 16:34, 6 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2025-25

[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:38, 16 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

This page is saved

[change source]

You did to rewrote List of Kate & Mim-Mim episodes, I will give you a barnstar. 2605:59C0:204E:FB08:1A65:71FF:FE7A:3C62 (talk) 23:53, 19 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

No worries, Happy editing, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 00:08, 20 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Explanations

[change source]

Why did you revert my edit here? https://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=24-hour_clock&oldid=10334934

I thought it was cool and interesting to put in which periods/parts of the day the hours belong: postmidnight (00:00 to 06:00), morning (06:00 to 12:00), afternoon (12:00 to 18:00) and evening/night (18:00 to 00:00). 168.232.221.4 (talk) 04:57, 20 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Imho the previous table and content looked fine and didn't need changing, If you disagree please start a discussion at the article talkpage or at WP:Simple Talk, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 07:35, 20 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Dummy edits

[change source]

Can you please avoid making dummy edits like Special:Diff/10345400 and Special:Diff/10345404? I don't know why you're linking to MOS:ITALICS: those edits have nothing to do with italics; they're just removing a space, and do not change the visual output in any way. 209.178.201.90 (talk) 22:27, 20 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi @209.178.201.90, I'll be honest a lot of pages need purging and I was too lazy to manually refresh each one so decided to make these edits instead, I don't know why the source change script is mentioning Italics and truth be told I don't know why I've never noticed that before?,
Anyway I've self reverted all of my edits, Thanks –Davey2010Talk 22:36, 20 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Ok, I wasn't saying to revert them, just that edits like that can fill up the page history and recent changes without good reason. I'm pretty sure Special:Diff/10345420 was OK but I haven't investigated whether it improved the page or not. 209.178.201.90 (talk) 22:39, 20 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Just an FYI but the script at Enwiki shows MOS:ITALICS in the edit summary too even when you don't make italic changes, I'm assuming there's consensus for this over there,
I know but it didn't sit right with me those edits standing when in fact I didn't make any italic changes, it's misleading and deceiving, If I saw someone else making those edits I would've warned them and told them to stop using fake summaries so yeah I can't in good conscience let them stand,
Thank you for the heads up it's much appreciated, Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 22:44, 20 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Short description

[change source]

Hi, I've updated it so the template only appears in preview mode. It's not very important as it doesn't affect the page in any way and can be swiftly removed using AWB or an automated script. I don't think displaying a red message on top of pages is a good idea, especially when the template's main purpose is just to prevent red links when people copy pages from other wikis. We had some discussion on it before. Thanks,-- BRP ever 00:02, 22 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi @BRPever, Okay that's fair enough, I'll be completely honest I'm not happy it's gone at all but instead of removing it with some bs excuse you have actually took the time to meet us half way which I appreciate a lot so thank you,
I see your point but I just don't agree with it - I'll get used to it over time I guess, Don't really want to edit war even more so when you've took the time to be the middle person here instead of being one sided, Thanks again, –Davey2010Talk 00:37, 22 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2025-26

[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:21, 23 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your wrongful edit on "SpaceX_Starship"

[change source]

Hi, your edit of today on Starship, is wrongful.--As of today, there is no (known) schedule for the next launch. Discussion at,
simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:SpaceX_Starship&oldid=10353489
. 2001:2020:32D:CF3C:5144:5DA:DFC6:FF90 (talk) 10:05, 25 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi @2001:2020:32D:CF3C:5144:5DA:DFC6:FF90, There's no need to state "the date of the next test flight, is unknown" - this should be obvious to readers, If a test flight is announced then we'd add it obviously, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 11:03, 25 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

RFD help

[change source]

Hey Davey2010,

you offered to take care of making the List of cities and towns in England page a disambiguation. Would you please take care of it? I just closed the RfD and would like to spend the time on reducing our backlog there. -Barras talk 12:58, 27 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Barras, Yep sure I'll do it later tonight, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 18:53, 27 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2025-27

[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:41, 30 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

31.0.62.86

[change source]

Hi Davey, with this IP, given they vandalised a lot of different articles, I just blocked them right off the bat. If you're reverting many of their edits, it's probably best to either report to VIP (although this case was technically 12 hours ago) or just give one higher level warning rather than giving three different ones at once. Thanks, --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 10:12, 1 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Ferien, Many thanks for blocking and for your help, I've gone down that route before and a certain admin has declined on the basis that "they were insufficiently warned", this has happened on more than one occasion so that's why I do it that way, I'm not happy with doing it the way I do but I don't really see any other way as I know when they were declined I then had to go from Level 1-4 again so basically they had 4 more times to vandalise which is stupid. Anyway thanks again for your help it's very much appreciated, Thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010Talk 10:37, 1 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
It definitely depends on the case, some admins prefer to see more warnings than others. For me, I like to see warnings, but if a user has gone on a vandalising spree like that IP did, then I will just block immediately or without warnings. Some users can stop if given warnings - given the fact they vandalised so many times if you feel like warning them, you can still just drop them a level 2 or 3 to start and that probably wouldn't be viewed as excessive. Thanks, --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 14:15, 1 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Exactly, I mean I wouldn't lvl4 someone who's made a few silly edits here and there but when it's been like this IP then yeah lvl 4 should be done obviously, I guess it all comes down to luck of the draw with which admin you get :), Anyway thanks again for your helpful comments and for blocking the IP its much appreciated, Have a great day, Many Thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010Talk 14:23, 1 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

britannica.com

[change source]

Can you please explain why you have removed a reference to britannica.com as spam? --M7 (talk) 10:30, 2 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

@M7 Because various new accounts have been adding Britannica and I simply assumed these spammers had been paid to add Britannica, Maybe I'm wrong though, –Davey2010Talk 10:45, 2 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Flood

[change source]

if you are just doing refs before punctuations do you want the flood flag? fr33kman 14:23, 7 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hey @Fr33kman, No thanks that was it, Thanks for asking though much appreciated, Thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010Talk 14:26, 7 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
OK, if in the future you need the flag leave me a message on my talk page as it will ping my email and I can come online and give you the flag for a bit :) fr33kman 14:31, 7 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Okay will do :), , Thanks again, –Davey2010Talk 14:35, 7 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Do remember these can just be done by FerienBot anyways! Thanks, --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 15:16, 7 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hi @Ferien, Ah okay the bot hasn't edited since March so I just assumed it wasn't active anymore, Duly noted I'll stop with those edits, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 15:23, 7 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Edit period/s: Every month or so when Ferien remembers... I'm a forgetful person especially as I've basically been on hiatus these past few months so that was fair enough! :) But going forward it should be every month on the 1st. So next run will be 1 August. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 15:25, 7 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Haha no worries :), okie dokie no worries I'll stop with those edits :), Many thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010Talk 15:33, 7 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2025-28

[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:06, 8 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Apology

[change source]

My apologies GeoGlobe Tales (talk) 02:46, 8 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Apologies

[change source]

Dear Davey2010,

I apologise for my initial reaction to the deletion of my article. I have figured you were just trying to help me. I just got mad because I worked hard. How did you feel when I erased all your work? My intent was to alert you, then revert the page. However, it turned out to be very far from what my plan was. I am officially apologising for my rude reaction, and I promise to always read why you think my articles are not good, so I can improve on them. I am feeling great remorse for you and thank you, for helping me improve my articles.

Signed, GeoGlobeTales GeoGlobe Tales (talk) 02:50, 8 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi @GeoGlobe Tales, Thank you for your apology, All is forgiven :), If my articles were QD'd I'd be less than impressed so I do understand and do sympathise, Unfortunately though love it or hate it it's the process but yeah I totally get why you reacted that way, Happy editing Geo :), Thanks again for your apology, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 09:42, 8 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2025-29

[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:10, 14 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2025-30

[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:43, 21 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

[change source]
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
For your tireless work here on the simplewiki, making new articles and working on current ones (and now helping with that pesky IP vandal) I present to you the Defender of the Wiki Barnstar! Congratulations! Bobherry Talk My Changes 18:47, 23 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hi User:Bobherry, Thanks so much I greatly appreciate the barnstar :), Thank you for improving the articles and for fixing the mistakes I make, Your help is always greatly appreciated :), Happy editing, Warm Regards, –Davey2010Talk 19:37, 23 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism?

[change source]

Hello dear, i restored the last fair version on Koli caste so why you reverted my edits. Harbhajan Piyale (talk) 13:14, 24 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi User:Harbhajan Piyale, My sincere and unreserved apologies, I thought you were vandalising the article, Unfortunately I didn't look back far enough and didn't realise you were actually reverting an IP so my sincere apologies for reverting you - Thank you for spotting this and for reverting the article back to its original state,
Could I please ask in future that when you revert to a revision that you state who you're reverting otherwise it unfortunately looks like you're just vandalising it, Happy editing :), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 13:27, 24 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Of course brother, you can absolutely ask me anything. Harbhajan Piyale (talk) 13:29, 24 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2025-31

[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:27, 29 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Flooding

[change source]

Hello, you're flooding recent changes at the moment and seem to be making a lot of the same change. Would you like the flood flag? --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 19:53, 29 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Ferien, Oops so sorry, Yes please, Not sure how long this will take though as I'm constantly stopping to make sure all edits made are okay, So sorry for flooding the rc page though, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 19:56, 29 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
No worries, I can take a look through any of the changes that might have slipped through while you were doing it. I will keep it on for 3 hours. I should be online for quite a while. Let me know when you complete if you want to move onto something else. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 19:58, 29 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hi @Ferien, Okay brilliant thank you :), Okay I'll ping here once I'm done (or once the ratelimit has exhausted my patience lol whichever one comes first :)), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 20:00, 29 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
I won't ping you bc I don't want to bring you here unnecessarily - Still going to run this, I'm using AI to get Python running but at the moment I'm having to split the .txt doc into many parts so it's all taken longer than I planned/hoped. I'll ping once done, Thanks :) –Davey2010Talk 21:59, 29 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
All done thanks @Ferien :), My plan was to sort though more Lint stuff this week but having spent over 6 hours trying to set up a scraping code with Python via an AI ... yeah my brain is fried.
If only Wikipedia went with page= instead of offset=<random number>, I would've been done like 11 hours sooner and I would have more braincells than I do right now 😭, Anyway I've gone through all edits and have fixed those that have messed up, Thanks again, –Davey2010Talk 23:10, 30 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Montbard

[change source]

Can you take a look at your edit here and figure out what went on? Looks like you pasted a whole different article into it. CountryANDWestern (talk) 18:37, 30 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi @CountryANDWestern, Thanks for the heads up, I am pausing and checking each and every edit made just to be safw, Not sure why but I keep getting "conflict" pop ups which means like that edit everything's gone wrong, Anyway I'll check all soon, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 18:57, 30 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Explanations

[change source]

Why do you revert my edits for no reason? I'm not vandalizing, even though my IP address is this format. I edit multiple times to make the pages "as perfect as possible," with straightforward, easy-to-understand information. I'm not spamming anything. 2804:5758:0:2CD6:84F3:876E:808C:CB08 (talk) 00:51, 5 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your edits are unsourced, Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 00:54, 5 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Much of the information on this wiki is unsourced, yet you chose to revert my edits out of pure persecution. Why don't you stop this? 2804:5758:0:40F2:D15A:351F:1E68:C1B (talk) 01:45, 5 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
I don't want fights or confusion, I just want to edit in peace and for editors like you to stop this bizarre and childish behavior of having edit wars with these horrible reversions. 2804:5758:0:40F2:D15A:351F:1E68:C1B (talk) 01:47, 5 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, The project having unsourced claims doesn't mean yours should be excused either. All edits here must be reliably sourced and in an ideal world I would love for that to be the case .... but we have like 8 million articles here ... do you really think we're gonna get that unsourced number down in my lifetime ? Yeah I don't either.
Please seek consensus for your changes. –Davey2010Talk 01:51, 5 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
I've already added the source to the articles. Now there's no reason for you to act unhealthily with your unfair reversals. On the page, Witching hour, I just put the times in 12-hour format (AM/PM) in parentheses. Although the source says morning is between midnight and noon, there are sources that say the period between midnight and dawn is postmidnight. This is proof that I really just want to contribute to the project; I never intended to vandalize here. 2804:5758:0:40F2:D15A:351F:1E68:C1B (talk) 02:00, 5 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
I've put back the fonts you removed from the witching hour page. 2804:5758:0:40F2:D15A:351F:1E68:C1B (talk) 02:13, 5 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
You'd replaced a claim and 2-3 reliable sources with a claim and 1 unreliable source, also the content you're adding doesn't match Enwiki, Lastly you were told 3/4 times to seek consensus for your changes which you failed to do –Davey2010Talk 09:12, 5 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2025-32

[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 03:41, 5 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

August 2025

[change source]
You have been blocked from changing Wikipedia for 48 hours for being unkind and rude. I came across your comments regarding an RFD. You've been blocked with that reason in the past already. What you did here clearly passes the line..

Once the block has ended you can make helpful changes. Please read Wikipedia's blocking policy and remember that adding spam, making changes that do not have a neutral point of view, making personal attacks on others, not respecting other people's privacy, and vandalizing pages are not allowed. If you do any of these things, you will be blocked again.

If you think this block is unfair, you can ask to be unblocked by adding {{Unblock|your reason here}} below. If you cannot do this or the reason is private please send an e-mail to simple-admins-l@lists.wikimedia.org and an administrator will look at your reason and reply. You may want to read our guide to unblock requests before asking to be unblocked. Barras talk 22:08, 7 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Barras, Indeed I did call them a moron but I also called myself a moron and then 20 odd minutes later stated "Scrubbing edit summary which I apologise for, I simply don't understand why you'd be awkward for the sake of being awkward .... How have your edits helped the article?, How has moving this benefited the project ?, What is to be gained from moving the article back to a title that doesn't even match Enwiki ?, Whatever it's moved, article is back to pre-improvement state so everyone wins except the reader."
I don't understand the logic of "the article has to remain at its current title whilst at the RFD" - Why?, Agreed if it's deleted then the admin would have to delete an extra page, but on the flip side if it's kept it now meets Wikipedia standards and matches Enwiki ..... I simply don't understand why someone has to be awkward and disruptive for the sake of being awkward and disruptive ....
Nonetheless I still commented on the contributor, not the contribution so I was rightfully blocked, although Auntof6 hasn't used naughty language imho their actions have still been disruptive to the project and probably more disruptive than my naughty word. –Davey2010Talk 09:43, 8 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
I’m not commenting on the underlying issue. I’m sorry about the block, as I just noted at AN. Disputes between users should be handled civilly, and I was genuinely disappointed to see those edits from you. I do think you’re a net positive for the project; however, what you did was out of line. -Barras talk 15:33, 8 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

ONESTRIKE Review

[change source]

Good afternoon Davey, There is an ongoing discussion at the administrators' noticeboard related to your pattern of incivility on this project. I personally feel that this situation does fall under ONESTRIKE. If you would like to provide a response on why the project should not apply ONESTRIKE in this instance, please post it here.

Separately, I am saddened we are here, as I have appreciated your strong work on the project and I count you as a fellow member of the community. Unfortunately, your actions have resulted in this situation, and as administrators and a community as a whole, we have to maintain a civil and kind environment for all. Best, Griff (talk) 13:02, 8 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Barras, @Griffinofwales et al.
I've come a long way from the person I was even 2 years ago and although I'm not perfect - I'm not as bad either but still some of the comments listed at ANI were completely over the line and should never have been said irrespective of how angry or frustrated I was,
I do want to give context for the comments listed which is by no means me justifying what was said but give reason as to why what was said was said:
- Auntof6 has/had a habit of interfering with my sandboxes which I'll be honest did infuriate me, I personally don't believe this was incivil
I had asked at AN for an article to be moved, Adelaide had took it upon themselves to move the article to a completely random and odd name which simply created more work for admins, I can't remember why but it wasn't the first time Ade had done something "silly" and so when it happened the second time I was less than pleased however nonetheless the language used should not have been used (and FWIW I've regretted those comments since the day I made them).
- Not really incivil per se, I offered my help to an editor who turned out to be a prolific LTA, Could I have used better quotes than "you f'd around and found out = absolutely)
- I don't see how this is uncivil, Everyone knows Auntof6 refuses to block vandals and so I was airing my frustration with that (How is someone making homophobic and racial comments not blockable ?)
- As you can see here this guy kept pestering me so I simply made it clear I didn't care what he had to say (certainly could've been politer than that though)
That all being said none of the language used is okay and I'm certainly not doubling down and saying it was acceptable because it categorically is/was not but not every comment listed there was incivil imho.
I also didn't realise the whole Commons thing made me an easier target to be blocked everywhere else (again hindsight's a lovely thing).
Anyway as I said above I've come a long long with my comments and how I deal with things but sure I'm not perfect but then again no one is perfect, We all have our flaws and unfortunately mine is having a short fuse.
I can promise to rein it in and try to use better words etc but I cannot promise that I'll never make an incivil comment again (that's not me saying "I'll continue as is", I'm simply saying I'm going to slip up from time to time, But I'll try and do better and continue to improve as I have been doing these past few years).
I'm not here for fights, I'm not here to tell people to F Off or call people morons; I'm here to improve this encyclopedia for our readers as we all are.
I would love to be unblocked, and for things to return as they were (just without my comments and for me to use much better phrasing) but I guess that ship's sailed. I don't like the idea of being given a final chance/monitored because then anyone can drag me back there for the most silliest of reasons; (although I guess the best thing to do would be not to give someone a reason to drag me there; easier said than done). I don't make the comments everyday and certainly going forward I would do better as I already have been.
I know my comments here won't make an ounce of difference and by the looks of it I'm going to be community banned anyway so I may as well seal that deal and throw my support in for a CBAN. It's been nice working with you all and I wish you all the very best, I'm just sorry for my comments and that it had to end this way, Anyway take care and thanks again for everything, Bye, Dave // –Davey2010Talk 21:00, 8 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Fr33kman, So I originally wasn't going to respond any further but felt your reply needed a reply, Could you please explain how I'm not taking any responsibility for my comments ?, I have literally stated right above and I quote "I've come a long way from the person I was even 2 years ago and although I'm not perfect - I'm not as bad either but still some of the comments listed at ANI were completely over the line and should never have been said irrespective of how angry or frustrated I was" - How is that not taking responsibility ?, "my comments are fine and I stand by them, the end" would be closer to your comment no?
"Davey must also publicly apologise to Auntof6" - The "Imagine waking up one day and saying to yourself "You know what, I'm going to be awkward for the sake of being awkward"" comment I felt was/is true - this isn't the first time Ao6 has unneedlessly been awkward, maybe they were following procedure and I'm just completely unaware of it/not seeing it but as I say this isn't the first time they've what I have perceived to be "awkward and or disruptive for the sake of it" (case in point being VIP, sandboxes, articles moves, other things which I've long forgotten), That being said the rest of the comment shouldn't have been said and I had (indirectly) apologised for it here,
"As such I'd support waiting for the block to expire and being given a final zero-tolerance warning which would result in an instant 6-12 month block upon even a single violation" - I appreciate that but a final zero-tolerance warning just gives someone the ammunition to take something I say out of context or twist it to make it sound like something it isn't and drag me back there?; I've very much aware of the severity of the situation I've got myself in (and although it is NOT about what I want) I would rather the block expires, thread gets closed (and a warning too), and I continue as is with no final warnings being placed under me (I will certainly be treating it as a final warning and will do much better going forward) but for me setting this final thing in stone just gives someone the ammunition to drag me there for the most silliest of reasons.
I would be happy to support an IBAN between myself and Aof6 if that would help as it seems the majority (not all) of my incivilty has revolved around them,
As I'm not requesting unblocks; if anyone wishes I stop replying here I would happily abide by that, don't want to lose talkpage access. Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 00:16, 9 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Merely stating, multiple times, that you feel some of your comments were not incivil leads me to the conclusion that you're not taking responsibility for your comments. I'm sure you've heard it before but "it's not what you say, it's how you say it." I've had interactions with other people that I've scratched my head over but never once have I been rude to them. It is also worth noting that no pages on a wiki belong to us, not even sandboxes. You could have taken her edits as being helpful and simply have moved on. Instead you took things personally when you shouldn't have. Take this situation as a chance to learn and grow. I'm sure you are a good person, don't let your temper prove otherwise. fr33kman 00:35, 9 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
I had replied to each and every point but in the end felt it was probably only making things worse for myself, I will say however I had asked them on more than one occasion to not edit my sandboxes but unfortunately they still continued, If someone asked me to stop editing their sandbox then I would stop so I simply wished my requests could have been fulfilled instead of ignored,
I always welcome feedback positive or negative and genuinely do try and improve, Anyway I'll stop replying as I don't want to turn this into ANI.2 and certainly don't want to dig myself a deeper hole (as someone at Enwiki once said to me; If you've dug yourself a hole; stop digging before you can't get yourself out!), Perfect time to be following that advice! :),
I've loved every second of editing here and loved creating articles here - being in this situation truly does suck (and I only have myself to blame), –Davey2010Talk 01:28, 9 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Warning

[change source]

As your block has now expired I am here to issue you with a warning about your future behaviour. You will not use foul language or insulting comments towards any other user on this project. If you do so even once you will be blocked for a period between 6 and 12 months depending on the nature of violation. This is your last and only warning. fr33kman 01:33, 10 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

To accept the terms of this warning you must acknowledge this here and furthermore you will make a public apology to Auntof6 on her talk page within 24 hours. Failure to do these two things will result in a 6 month block. fr33kman 04:06, 10 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Since you have not responded after 24 hours you have been blocked for 6 months for being rude or unkind. fr33kman 05:11, 11 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Fr33kman I'm rather disappointed that you felt the need to block me so quickly considering I've not been on and considering I've not edited any project since I last edited here.
My only reason for not responding sooner is because I've been self-reflecting and have been thinking about my incivility across different projects not just here; I can't help but think maybe my bluntless (and occasional anger outburst) has made me incompatible with Wikimedia as a whole. I'm indeffed on Commons, by some miracle escaped a block on Enwiki and by some miracle escaped an indef block here so clearly my incivility is a problem and perhaps more of a problem than I realised. I also notice that no one anywhere leaves the edit summaries that I do and I think maybe there's a reason for that; they're already indeffed!. I also know that we now have WP:UCOC which makes it 10x easier for me to be blocked too,
I've also realised I'm now a strong candidate for being RFC-blocked on Meta considering my incivility has spawned across 3 projects.
@Auntof6, I sincerely apologise for calling you a moron and sincerely apologise for my incivil comments to you in the past, I very much don't agree with a lot of things you do but at the end of the day we're here for one thing; our readers. I will do better going forward.
I do feel like it's now or never and I fear the never part will see me indeffed on another project which I don't want. I would like to work towards not being incivil and actually hoping to reverse my indef block on Commons at some point (I wished I thought about ONESTRIKE much much sooner; scary part is that actually applies to me and probably applies across all projects not just here!,
Anyway I'm inclined to keep the 6 month block as is in order to give me a break for a bit, Without going into too much detail life isn't a bed of roses right now and I've found out a family member won't be with us anywhere between now-year etc and I know when that happens ... yeah .... I won't be in the right frame of mind and I don't want to undo the good work I would've done, Deep down when that day comes; I'll want to edit here to keep my mind busy but yeah I know someone will tick me off and we'll be back to square one and the last thing I'll want is another block so yeah I would like to keep the block as is please.
Before I disappear; I also want to apologise to the community for my constant incivil comments, I don't take any enjoyment from being incivil but as I say I will do better going forward and will implement steps going forward. Of course words are taken with a pinch of salt; it's actions that need to be seen.
I will see you all in February,
Thanks,
Kind Regards,
Dave
CC @Auntof6, @CountryANDWestern, @Griffinofwales, @BRPever, @Barras, @Fr33kman and @Peterdownunder whom had all commented on the ANI thread. (sorry not sure if anyone's watching my page, thanks) –Davey2010Talk 11:06, 11 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Take care and I hope you come back after your block has ended. Regards fr33kman 12:49, 11 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks I hope so too, Take care Fr33kman, Thanks –Davey2010Talk 18:24, 11 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
I will miss you! Hope you return Cactus🌵 hi 09:23, 12 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2025-33

[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:30, 11 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2025-34

[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:38, 19 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2025-35

[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:13, 26 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2025-36

[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:51, 1 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2025-37

[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 01:15, 9 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2025-38

[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 17:07, 15 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2025-39

[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 22:56, 22 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2025-40

[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:53, 29 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2025-41

[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 17:24, 6 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2025-42

[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:00, 13 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2025-43

[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:37, 20 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2025-44

[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:32, 27 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2025-45

[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:35, 3 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2025-46

[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:38, 10 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2025-47

[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 17:26, 17 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2025-48

[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 15:56, 24 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2025-49

[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 18:58, 1 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2025-50

[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 17:45, 8 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2025-51

[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:03, 15 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2025-52

[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 21:45, 22 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-03

[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:34, 12 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-04

[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:30, 19 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-05

[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 21:18, 26 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-06

[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 17:44, 2 February 2026 (UTC)Reply