User talk:Djsasso

From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This talk page is automatically archived by SassoBot. Any sections older than 30 days are automatically archived. Sections without timestamps are not archived.
  • Archive #1 - Entries archived from May 2008 through March 2009.
  • Archive #2 - Entries archived from April 2009 through March 2010.
  • Archive #3 - Entries archived from April 2010 through August 2011.
  • Archive #4 - Entries archived from September 2011 through April 2012.
  • Archive #5 - Entries archived from May 2012 through September 2013.
  • Archive #6 - Entries archived from October 2013 through November 2016.
  • Archive #7 - Entries archived from December 2016 through November 2018.
  • Archive #8 - Entries archived from December 2018 through September 2019.
  • Archive #9 - Entries archived from November 2019 through January 2021.
  • Archive #10 - Entries archived from February 2021 through May 2021.
  • Archive #11 - Entries archived from June 2021 through Current.

Duke of York[change source]

When you revert my changes you are not always checking everything. On this particular article you completely wiped out the source that has been on there. Will you please fix your error? PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 14:48, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

I wasn't reverting your changes, I was reverting the change that added the source. -Djsasso (talk) 14:49, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
It wiped out my changes too. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 14:50, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Of course it did, because it removed the source which your change was editing. -Djsasso (talk) 14:51, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
There was another change I made which was to the wording. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 14:53, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
You only changed the wording of the source diff. -Djsasso (talk) 14:55, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Incorrect. Just before it I stated “Since 1986, the Duke is Prince Andrew, Duke of York.” PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 14:59, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
diff PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 15:00, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
No the Since 1986 etc was part of the edit I was reverting. diff. If you are saying you made that edit then you are sockpuppeting and I should block your account. Are you confirming that Ethan2345678 is you? -Djsasso (talk) 15:05, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
So one - hell to the no. If you feel like you need to CU please do. Secondly, why would you remove a valid source just because a sock-puppet added it? We allow them to create articles and everything else on here and do not remove them. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 15:15, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Because part of their issue has been bad sources. Lots of sock stuff gets removed on here, hell I am pretty sure I have seen you reverting LTAs. So maybe just maybe keep your anger issues in check before you go spouting off if you don't actually understand diffs and what is happening. -Djsasso (talk) 15:15, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
I am pretty sure though that a UK government website would have the correct information about the Royal family, would it not? PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 15:17, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
And again a personal attack on me saying I have anger issues. Wow. Final straw. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 15:18, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Not a personal attack to state that you absolutely lose your cool anytime you think someone is doing something that affects your edits. Just another factor in your WP:CIR box. -Djsasso (talk) 15:21, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
But again you are once again assuming I am angry and now back to WP:CIR of which it is neither. However, the constant demeaning, derogatory, and accusations you keep throwing at me (since day 1) has been an issue and I’m going to seek alternatives at this point. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 15:29, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
I don't have to assume. You are the one making the angry posts. They CIR comes in when you can't read a diff and go and complain to someone about something and then when they show you a diff of your own edit which doesn't have wording change you still don't listen and continue to try and argue. But go ahead and seek alternatives if you wish, you will likely just see a WP:BOOMERANG. I haven't said anything that you haven't done so go ahead. There is a saying, if people keep pointing out issues then maybe the fault isn't with them, it is with you. Your block log on and your editing history here backs up anything I have ever said. -Djsasso (talk) 15:34, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
There are no angry posts. When you are reverting whatever it is, it shows mine right next to it and that you removed it from my edit. None of my edits have been problematic. Or very few of the more advanced kind that I’m working on getting familiar with and I ask questions. You are the only person on this Wiki who has issues with me. Everyone else (admins and users alike) have been helpful and kind (except LTAs of course). You appear to be extremely fixated on my past and are trying to get me to the point where you can block me but I’m not that person that I was over there. Again you are assuming my posts and conversations are angry and I keep telling you they are not. If that is how you want to interpret them, I cannot do anything about it. However you constantly accusing me of being angry, the post above asking me about if I’m an lta user and you should block me, telling me I’m spouting off, and every other comment. Stating I absolutely lose my cool like you did above. You do not know me and I have never once done any of those. If I did I would have been blocked a long time ago. Instead I’m engaging you in conversation but am being attacked by you and your insinuating remarks, which are not expected of an admin. At this point I’m going to end this conversation. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 15:51, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
I am not trying to get you to the point where I can block you, in my opinion you passed the blocking point a long time ago. Quite the opposite actually, if I was trying to get you blocked you would have been blocked a long time ago. You continue to do many of the same things here that got you blocked there. You did it in this statement right now, blaming me for pointing out problems that you have. I am not the first person that has pointed out that you ignore peoples concerns and then blame them and get mad at them when they point them out to you. I can go get quotes from other people pointing out you do the same thing in the past. I would like nothing more than for you to be a productive editor, but you can't continually jump at people when they point out issues you have. It isn't productive, and anger issues combined with competency issues is a textbook case of WP:CIR. -Djsasso (talk) 16:01, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Doraemon[change source]

What are your thoughts on breaking down the cast members a little more in some of the sections where it says like Japanese Cast, English Cast, American Cast, etc? Right now it is just a massive list with bullet points everywhere indented one or two times so basically adding another heading for each one under their respective titles? PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 18:40, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Yuck that page is a mess. Yeah, if you think you can make it cleaner I am game for pretty much anything. To be honest, the best course of action might be to make stubs for each of the different series and split out the characters to them. But whatever you think is best. The current situation is definitely not good. -Djsasso (talk) 19:04, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
So basically chop it down to a bunch of stubs? I am thinking they were trying to do something along the lines of a series. I can work on it over the next couple of days. Thanks. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 19:15, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Yeah like that article on is basically about the franchise as a whole. Looking at it I see that in a bunch of sections they see also link to specific articles for the different series, which I assume is where they have the more detailed stuff. I didn't follow the links so not sure. The IP(s) might be getting a bit carried away with how much cast they are listing as well. -Djsasso (talk) 19:19, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Ok. I will tear it apart section by section. Thanks. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 19:23, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Onlyinclude[change source]

What is the purpose of this in some templates? I am trying to find where the }} is not on the template on Game of Thrones and I noticed that one entry says <only.....>73</onl...>? Thanks. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 20:12, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Onlyinclude tags make it so only the stuff in them show up on the page the template is put on. -Djsasso (talk) 10:31, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
But it does that without them too though? If it is a template, doesn't it only take data validation for that template? PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 17:20, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Some people use onlyinclude tags to include things and others use noinclude tags to exclude things. Same result and opposite ways of doing things. Either is good. -Djsasso (talk) 17:22, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
okies PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 17:24, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 (change conflict)  I just looked at the page you are talking about and didn't realize you meant in the parameters of the template. I thought you meant in the template code itself. In this case we are likely only using it because is. And is using it probably because some other page is transcluding the entire page (like you would a template) and only want certain info showing up. This is often done if you want to take sections from a bunch of similar articles and then have them all show up on one central article as well. -Djsasso (talk) 17:26, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Is it necessary when it is only a number, I think in this case 73. Does it need those parameters? PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 17:28, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
I just looked and on our wiki they can be removed. Looks like on they need to be there because List of Game of Thrones episodes is taking the info for that article. So it is possible in the future we would need it. But we don't at the moment. -Djsasso (talk) 17:31, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

The Identifiers[change source]

These are the identifiers from the authority control bar. AC comes up red line for them and when I look at EN, that is what they have. Those identifiers are linked to one thing. I am working on the main article now but needed to fix the redlinks so AC works right. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 19:46, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

No I understand that part, to fix the redlink you should have just created the missing redirect to the already existing article. By all means bring over and simplify the info from But you should do it on the article that already exists here at MusicBrainz. -Djsasso (talk) 19:48, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Ok I was just following their layout. Thanks. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 19:50, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Yeah you just created the article at MBRG (identifier) which on is a redirect is all I meant. Probably just didn't notice that it redirected you to MusicBrainz on Happens to me sometimes. -Djsasso (talk) 19:53, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Ok so how would I fix that in authority control as it goes to the identifier codes (either one of the two I made) then redirects. I don't think we should really be doing that based on redirect guide. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 20:11, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
That is how the authority control template works. All the identifiers redirect to the main article. That is why the redirect template you copied over exists, for all the various identifiers that redirect to their main article. For example if you look at Grace Kelly if you click on any of the links in the AC that are a wikilink as opposed to external they go to a redirect which redirects to the organization page. There is even one on there for MusicBrainz which uses a different identifier. You just happened to stumble onto a couple of identifiers that weren't redirected here yet. -Djsasso (talk) 20:17, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Ah ok. So when I come across those, if they are redlinked, create a redirect that goes to the main article (if we have it or create it). Am I understanding you correctly? PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 20:19, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Yep. You had the right idea, just needed to be pointed in the right direction. Some of these organizations have multiple identifiers so if we created the article at each one there would be a lot of repetition. If you click on "What links here" on the side bar on the MusicBrainz article you can see there are a bunch redirected to it already. -Djsasso (talk) 20:28, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Awesome, I will do a couple and then link you to them so you can check my work before I get too far into it. Basically my entire idea (besides fighting our LTAs (which should be hitting any day now as it is the end of the month)) is to get as many articles as I can corrected and start working on the content. Thanks for the information. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 20:33, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Rollback[change source]

Hello DJSasso, Hope you're well, In regards to Rollback, It should be noted that

  • In this edit an IP added what is obviously a spam link - They were rollbacked.
  • In this edit an IP changed "an" to "a" (although prior to this they did vandalise the article however this edit specifically wasn't vandalism) - They were rollbacked
  • In this edit an IP added (unsourced) Brazilian dates (and added this under an account prior too) - They were rollbacked
  • In this edit an IP added unsourced content - They were rollbacked,

Do I trust you're going to send them all a rollback revocation message because all of what's linked isn't vandalism either,

I still stand by my rollback of Ricardo who had changed a whole ton of articles without any consensus. Twinkle does not work and no one is going to spend a whole hour or 2 individually clicking undo and then pasting the same edit summary 20-100 times ..... If it worked I would've used it.

Anyway I would ask that if you genuinely believe my reverts/rollback are harmful to this project that you then please revoke my rollback and autopatrol rights (if this happened then I wouldn't revert any vandals from this point onwards). Anyway I'm sorry for my unintentional disruption. Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 22:02, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) - These kinds of things should be posted on WP:AN so all admins can see it and take action. I have added warnings to those IPs about their edits. I would also link to this topic on this page on the AN. Thanks PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 22:47, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Unfortunately you're missing the point - Those IPs were all rollbacked for non-vandalism reasons yet I get threatened with rollback-revocation for my edits which I disagree with, So either those rollbackers were incorrect to use rollback and should be warned, or my right-revocation warning should be rescinded. –Davey2010Talk 22:54, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
And still I would post it on the admins notice board and the admins can make that decision. Djsasso may not be back on today but posting on that board you will get a faster response. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 22:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
You need to worry about what you are doing, not what other people are doing. You did a huge amount of rollbacks in a row in what amounted to a content dispute, the very opposite of how it is supposed to be used, had you done a single one here or there no one would likely have flinched. I realize you believe there was no consensus for him to do so, however, you would be wrong as there was a discussion on moving the page and consensus was reached, meaning it was perfectly acceptable and not no consensus to change them, had you discussed first instead of jumping to rapidly rolling back you might have found that out. And yes, many of us very often go one by one and undo many edits instead of rolling them back when its not warranted. I gave you a note about the issue to be nice, I could have just removed them. All you had to do was say you know what, you are right that wasn't vandalism and everything would be fine and we could all go on about our days. -Djsasso (talk) 00:12, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Oh and I should point out 1,2,4 in your list above are all vandalism. Spam is a form of vandalism, we have a vandal that goes around changing an to a all the time, and we have a vandal that adds hoax information to movie infoboxes which is the last one. I would have to check into 3 more and see, but we have a vandal that adds fake dates to video games as well so I am guessing that is likely them. So its likely all 4 of those are vandalism. -Djsasso (talk) 00:22, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Fair point. In hindsight I should've used undo that would've been the sensible option. I apologise for becoming wound up yesterday I've had issues elsewhere and truth be told I was fed up so yesterday was the tip of the iceberg. Anyway I apologise for using rollback shouldn't of been used, Take care and stay safe, Warm Regards, –Davey2010Talk 11:22, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
No worries, I understand. -Djsasso (talk) 11:25, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

CS1 Error[change source]

So on Hans Asperger I see Category:CS1_maint:_extra_punctuation as an error and I gone through it and cleared out all ,:; that I can find, but it is still there. I did a purge and a CTRL+F5 to no avail. Does the module have to run or something to get it out of those categories? Typically when I fix them, they are gone so I am thinking I missed something. Please advise. Thanks! PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 22:45, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @PotsdamLamb: You missed one. I fixed it, and fixed another error while I was at it. --Auntof6 (talk) 00:30, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Haha I was just posting that I got the comma in this diff when I edit conflicted with you lol. -Djsasso (talk) 00:31, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Oops! I missed that I got an edit conflict. --Auntof6 (talk) 00:32, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
@Auntof6@Djsasso Thanks Dj. Aunt, what was the other error as I only see Dj’s posted for the edit conflict? PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 00:45, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
I think we both made that same fix at the same time is what she is saying as well. I "won" the edit conflict on that page and she "won" it here lol. -Djsasso (talk) 00:47, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
🤣 PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 01:24, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
It was the CS1 maint: PMC format error. I didn't go back to fix it after the edit conflict, so it's still there. --Auntof6 (talk) 01:09, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Oh yeah I didn't fix that one. -Djsasso (talk) 01:11, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Done now though. -Djsasso (talk) 01:12, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
So that is weird because I put it in the box but it didn’t add the PMC before the numbers. Now I know and now I grow! Thanks! PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 01:27, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
@PotsdamLamb: And by the way, thanks for doing cleanup! --Auntof6 (talk) 02:38, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
No worries @Auntof6! PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 03:48, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
@Auntof6@Djsasso I’m going to assume one of you used AWB and cleaned out the cat? I was going to start manually doing them since I don’t have access to AWB and poof all gone! Thanks to whomever did that! (The PMC errors) @Auntof6@Djsasso PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 07:03, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
@PotsdamLamb: Djsasso cleaned it out, but I don't know if it was by using AWB. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:39, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
It was 200+ articles ;) PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 10:35, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
47 to be exact lol. But yes it was a simple search and replace so when I fixed the one I figured I might as well fix them all. Only took me a couple minutes. -Djsasso (talk) 10:52, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Oh so did you just do a search in the search bar for something like this pmc=pmc? PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 10:59, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Yeah I just searched and replaced pmc=pmc with pmc= -Djsasso (talk) 11:01, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Nice! To bad we can't do that with all of them lol! (off topic) Can you take a look at this please? I am seeing some NPOV (IMO). PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 11:04, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Talk for Comment!![change source]

Hello, I want to know your opinion in this regard. Thank you. Hirok Raja (talk) 08:01, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) I think it would be better to move the conversation to simple talk, like I said before. Ely - Talk 08:04, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Dear Sir, I am not able to create my page. You unblock it. Page: Anshuman Tiwari (musician)[change source]

Dear Sir, I am not able to create my page. You unblock it.

Page: Anshuman Tiwari (musician) Iamanshumantiwari (talk) 15:56, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Iamanshumantiwari, hi! The reason you are unable to recreate your page is because it was recreated several times, and met quick deletion criteria when it was recreated. Also, there was a request for deletion (RfD) for your page a couple of weeks ago, in which the community decided to delete the article (Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2021/Anshuman Tiwari). Pages deleted at requests for deletion should not be recreated. Please do not attempt to recreate the page. Thanks, --Ferien (talk) 16:03, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

I know you like this.....[change source]

On 2021–22 Premier League I am seeing qty. 2 of the Template Programming Element on the article through WPCleaner. The footer also shows Category:Pages using sports table with orphaned results and Category:Pages using duplicate arguments in template calls. I know how to fix the duplicate arguments on regular articles, but it looks like this one is pulling from other templates. Can you assist on this and also help me understand what to do or a quick way to find the duplicates as there are 582 in that CAT alone, but the first CAT is a redlink. I am wondering if I make that CAT if it would fill up pretty fast. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 23:23, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Boxes[change source]

Hey so something I do not know how to do. I fixed all the references on Khongjomnubi Nongarol but there are two boxes. One is a template and the other is a infobox book. The template is coming up to the left of the infobox instead of under it. I tried adding it within the curly brackets and that didn't work. What is the correct way to do it? Thanks. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 03:10, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @PotsdamLamb: They're both templates, actually: infoboxes are templates. In any case, take a look at what I did. By the way, you might want to put this kind of question on Simple Talk. It isn't really an admin thing, and you might get an answer faster. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:46, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
@Auntof6 That is interesting. I have never seen that used. Where is the explanation for it and in what ways can it be used? And thanks! These are non-urgent things so I am not usually looking for fast answers just the learning experience. I am aware this is not an "admin thing" but I do not remember reading anywhere I can only post admin things on an admin's talk page. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 04:53, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) @PotsdamLamb: It's a shortcut for the {{clear}} template; you can read about it in the template's documentation.
Of course you can post non-admin things on admins' talk pages. I just like to see questions posted on pages where they're likely to get the widest exposure and quickest response. --Auntof6 (talk) 05:50, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Ok I remember the clear part never knew you can do it with a hyphen though. Thanks for that tidbit. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 06:13, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Nasitasa[change source]

You won't have missed the arrival of this banned sock from En wiki. Macdonald-ross (talk) 18:20, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

About the Deletion of the article Mufti Mujeeb Ashraf Sahab Qibla[change source]

Good Evening. I read the discussion about the wikipedia article Mufti Mujeeb Ashraf Sahab Qibla and you have proved with good points on why the article should be closed. However, you also said that the article has significantly improved form its past state. The article is deleted now. So did you still think that the page should have been deleted and why? And if not then can I retrieve the article ? I don’t know much about wikipedia but if you can help retrieve the article I can try my best to improve the article with citations and more. If you cannot retrieve the article, then can you please tell me whom to talk to retrieve it. Sorry for disturbing. Hope you have a nice day Thank You Furqaan Qadri (talk) 21:14, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Please unmove a change[change source]

Thankyou sir but please undo this because as all references his orignal name is Brij Kishore Sharma "Tara"— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:201:3000:4110:DC1B:D073:8320:77F (talkcontribs) 10:46, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Sir there is two person with on name one is poet and one is politician see this and so I want that please change the poet's wikipedia page name because as all references his orignal name is Brij Kishore Sharma "Tara" and it is difficult know who is "Tara" and who is sharma so please move this page Thankyou— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:201:3000:4110:DC1B:D073:8320:77F (talkcontribs) 11:23, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Question[change source]

IP user is asking to be unblocked. It seems to be included in the rangeblock you made for How is included in that range when 197 doesn't seem to be included in 128? --Auntof6 (talk) 01:06, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

That range block covers - because it is a /17. You can see what IPs that are covered by range blocks with this calculator. -Djsasso (talk) 15:02, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Current iOS template.[change source]

I have removed Current iOS template from iPhone 12 Pro because it hasn’t created yet. Don’t remove this template again or you’ll be blocked. 13switch (talk) 13:10, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Highly suggest not warning people that they will be blocked for removing a template they never removed. It is only likely to lead yourself to a block. -Djsasso (talk) 15:46, 22 September 2021 (UTC)