User talk:DoSazunielle

From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome[change source]

Welcome, DoSazunielle!
Hello, DoSazunielle, and welcome to the Simple English Wikipedia! Thank you for your changes.

You may want to begin by reading these pages:

For some ideas of pages to work on, read Wikipedia:Requested pages or the list of wanted pages.

At Wikipedia, remember to be bold! This means that you should not be afraid to change any articles. This is because, if you make any mistakes, you can always fix it later! If you have any questions, you can always ask them at Simple Talk.

If you need help just click here and type {{helpme}} and your question.

I hope you have a fun time here. If you need any help, be sure to visit Simple Talk or contact an administrator. See you around! Rsk6400 (talk) 06:36, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Reliable sources[change source]

I saw that you used some sources at Rwanda which are not reliable. Please take a look at WP:RS. Greetings, --Rsk6400 (talk) 06:41, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Neutral point of view[change source]

Information.svg Wikipedia aims at providing a reliable source of information for its readers. That's why the Neutral point of view (NPOV) is so important. That means that we cannot present a fringe theory instead of the mainstream view. These things are explained in more detail in the English WP, en:WP:DUE. And the mainstream view about the genocide in Rwanda is that Hutu extremists were primarily responsible. --Rsk6400 (talk) 14:57, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

I don't believe it is wrong to mention things which are well-documented that are ignored by the mainstream. I also think Wikipedia mentions such things all the time. Undoing the changes seems wrong to me, and the reasons you give keep changing. DoSazunielle (talk) 15:23, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
There are a lot of rules telling us how and when to mention fringe theories in WP. I reverted you because you didn't follow these rules. Maybe I may add something more personal: I became curious and so I looked at your edits on the German Wiki. As you may have seen, I reviewed all those that had not been reviewed yet, approving nearly everything. As editors we are totally free to choose which articles we want to improve. If you feel that people like Kwame Ture are ignored by the mainstream, or don't get the attention they deserve, enhance their articles, and nobody can accuse you of POV. --Rsk6400 (talk) 16:40, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Omar Blondin Diop[change source]

An editor has requested deletion of Omar Blondin Diop, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2020/Omar Blondin Diop and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. Operator873talkconnect 15:58, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Kiilu Nyasha[change source]

An editor has requested deletion of Kiilu Nyasha, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2020/Kiilu Nyasha and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. Operator873talkconnect 16:00, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

November 2020[change source]

Nuvola apps important.svg It looks like you are in an edit war judging from the reverts you have made on Ohio. Take care, because the three-revert rule does not let users make more than three reverts on a single page in a single day. Any user may still be blocked for edit warring and disruption, even if they haven't broken the three-revert rule. When you disagree with another user, you should first try to talk about changes in order to work together to improve Wikipedia and reach consensus. If you continue to disrupt the page, you may be blocked from changing Wikipedia. Please cease this behaviour immediately. WP:ONESTRIKE applies. You have been warned in the above section abut WP:NPOV/WP:RS already, so this is more than enough warning. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 17:46, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Nuvola apps important.svg It looks like you are in an edit war judging from the reverts you have made on Indiana. Take care, because the three-revert rule does not let users make more than three reverts on a single page in a single day. Any user may still be blocked for edit warring and disruption, even if they haven't broken the three-revert rule. When you disagree with another user, you should first try to talk about changes in order to work together to improve Wikipedia and reach consensus. If you continue to disrupt the page, you may be blocked from changing Wikipedia. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 17:48, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

@Rsk6400: I would like to ask for your advice on handing the disagreement on the two pages above. I am asking you because it would be good to have a third party give an opinion and you have already talked to me about neutrality. DoSazunielle (talk) 17:58, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Allow me, as a third party, to give some advice. The best way to handle a disagreement is definitely not to edit war, regardless of whether you think you are right. Talk about your changes on the talk page and come to an agreement on what to do. You can see more here. Best, --IWI (talk) 18:05, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
I agree with IWI: Please don't start an edit war. Patience is a blessing (Tanzanian proverb). From what I saw, you seem to be interested in African and African American subjects, and these subjects are sadly underrepresented here. That's why I should say: We need you, don't get yourself blocked. The other user at Ohio has already started a discussion there, why not ask him why he thinks your edit is POV ? There are already five users involved in this discussion - normally it's easier for five people to reach a consensus than for two people. Once again: Patience. --Rsk6400 (talk) 19:58, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Slavery[change source]

Why do you want to add slavery background content into David Cameron and his wife page. These are his ancestors, and do not have much relevance to him. And why not just wealthy background, the source of wealth should be included in his parent pages (if they are notable), not him. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 18:18, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

  • I just explained on the talk pages for him and his wife. DoSazunielle (talk) 18:20, 16 November 2020 (UTC)