User talk:DoSazunielle

From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome[change source]

Welcome, DoSazunielle!
Hello, DoSazunielle, and welcome to the Simple English Wikipedia! Thank you for your changes.

You may want to begin by reading these pages:

For some ideas of pages to work on, read Wikipedia:Requested pages or the list of wanted pages.

At Wikipedia, remember to be bold! This means that you should not be afraid to change any articles. This is because, if you make any mistakes, you can always fix it later! If you have any questions, you can always ask them at Simple Talk.

If you need help just click here and type {{helpme}} and your question.

I hope you have a fun time here. If you need any help, be sure to visit Simple Talk or contact an administrator. See you around! Rsk6400 (talk) 06:36, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Reliable sources[change source]

I saw that you used some sources at Rwanda which are not reliable. Please take a look at WP:RS. Greetings, --Rsk6400 (talk) 06:41, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Neutral point of view[change source]

Information.svg Wikipedia aims at providing a reliable source of information for its readers. That's why the Neutral point of view (NPOV) is so important. That means that we cannot present a fringe theory instead of the mainstream view. These things are explained in more detail in the English WP, en:WP:DUE. And the mainstream view about the genocide in Rwanda is that Hutu extremists were primarily responsible. --Rsk6400 (talk) 14:57, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

I don't believe it is wrong to mention things which are well-documented that are ignored by the mainstream. I also think Wikipedia mentions such things all the time. Undoing the changes seems wrong to me, and the reasons you give keep changing. DoSazunielle (talk) 15:23, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
There are a lot of rules telling us how and when to mention fringe theories in WP. I reverted you because you didn't follow these rules. Maybe I may add something more personal: I became curious and so I looked at your edits on the German Wiki. As you may have seen, I reviewed all those that had not been reviewed yet, approving nearly everything. As editors we are totally free to choose which articles we want to improve. If you feel that people like Kwame Ture are ignored by the mainstream, or don't get the attention they deserve, enhance their articles, and nobody can accuse you of POV. --Rsk6400 (talk) 16:40, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Omar Blondin Diop[change source]

An editor has requested deletion of Omar Blondin Diop, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2020/Omar Blondin Diop and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. Operator873talkconnect 15:58, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Kiilu Nyasha[change source]

An editor has requested deletion of Kiilu Nyasha, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2020/Kiilu Nyasha and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. Operator873talkconnect 16:00, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

November 2020[change source]

Nuvola apps important.svg It looks like you are in an edit war judging from the reverts you have made on Ohio. Take care, because the three-revert rule does not let users make more than three reverts on a single page in a single day. Any user may still be blocked for edit warring and disruption, even if they haven't broken the three-revert rule. When you disagree with another user, you should first try to talk about changes in order to work together to improve Wikipedia and reach consensus. If you continue to disrupt the page, you may be blocked from changing Wikipedia. Please cease this behaviour immediately. WP:ONESTRIKE applies. You have been warned in the above section abut WP:NPOV/WP:RS already, so this is more than enough warning. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 17:46, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Nuvola apps important.svg It looks like you are in an edit war judging from the reverts you have made on Indiana. Take care, because the three-revert rule does not let users make more than three reverts on a single page in a single day. Any user may still be blocked for edit warring and disruption, even if they haven't broken the three-revert rule. When you disagree with another user, you should first try to talk about changes in order to work together to improve Wikipedia and reach consensus. If you continue to disrupt the page, you may be blocked from changing Wikipedia. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 17:48, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

@Rsk6400: I would like to ask for your advice on handing the disagreement on the two pages above. I am asking you because it would be good to have a third party give an opinion and you have already talked to me about neutrality. DoSazunielle (talk) 17:58, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Allow me, as a third party, to give some advice. The best way to handle a disagreement is definitely not to edit war, regardless of whether you think you are right. Talk about your changes on the talk page and come to an agreement on what to do. You can see more here. Best, --IWI (talk) 18:05, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
I agree with IWI: Please don't start an edit war. Patience is a blessing (Tanzanian proverb). From what I saw, you seem to be interested in African and African American subjects, and these subjects are sadly underrepresented here. That's why I should say: We need you, don't get yourself blocked. The other user at Ohio has already started a discussion there, why not ask him why he thinks your edit is POV ? There are already five users involved in this discussion - normally it's easier for five people to reach a consensus than for two people. Once again: Patience. --Rsk6400 (talk) 19:58, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Slavery[change source]

Why do you want to add slavery background content into David Cameron and his wife page. These are his ancestors, and do not have much relevance to him. And why not just wealthy background, the source of wealth should be included in his parent pages (if they are notable), not him. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 18:18, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

  • I just explained on the talk pages for him and his wife. DoSazunielle (talk) 18:20, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

January 2021[change source]

Hello. The source in the content you readded did not seem reliable, so please add a reliable source if you want to readd the content. Many thanks, Belwine💬📜 17:24, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Please remember what I told you last month, if there is any content dispute, use the talkpage and we need reliable sources, happy editing. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 17:25, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
I have just created a talk page discussion since neither of the users attempting to reverse the changes did so, nor did either supply evidence of the unreliability of either source cited (not sure why the discussion is only addressing one source, unless I missed something). DoSazunielle (talk) 17:27, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
I will say if the users don't, you don't revert and start a talk page discussion yourself, if there isn't any response, post on WP:ST and if still there isn't, you can say you had silence consensus and then you can revert without worry of edit warring. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 17:32, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Your recent edits[change source]

  • Hi. Your recent edits to a number of biographies of living persons are not really acceptable. What people's ancestors did is not really relevant to the article, unless his ancestor was a particularly well-known or notable slave owner. In addition, somebody already reverted that addition, and you re-added it instead of discussing it. Suffice to say: this pattern of behaviour is not acceptable; you must comply to out BLP and edit warring policies if you wish to continue editing here. You are welcome to make bold edits, but if people revert you, you must discuss the changes. Best, --IWI (talk) 14:48, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
    The statement "What people's ancestors did is not really relevant to the article, unless his ancestor was a particularly well-known or notable slave owner." is incorrect. Since you continue to question the relevance of edits discussing slavery even when they are explained to you clearly, I don't see the point in explaining why to you again; you can conduct your own research on the importance of slavery for accumulation of wealth and a family's ability to become prominent in society for yourself. DoSazunielle (talk) 15:05, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Your tendency to remove accurate information you feel has "undue weight" instead of suggesting additions in order to balance out the page is also unacceptable, as with your edit here and the needless debate on the Liberia page. DoSazunielle (talk) 15:12, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
That's not how it works. The onus is on you to make the content you add have due weight, not the editors who dispute you. --IWI (talk) 23:43, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

AN notice[change source]

Information icon4.svg Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "User:DoSazunielle". Thank you. --IWI (talk) 15:39, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Don't remove other people's comments from my talk page[change source]

Do not remove content from my talk page unless I ask for it or the person who left the comment asks for it. When I logged in, I had over 100 notifications because of endless reverting of other people's comments on my page. Don't do it. I am linking to the comment here so anyone can read it for themselves. DoSazunielle (talk) 01:00, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello. We do apologize for all the notifications. However, the edits the user made were vandalism. Users would revert the edits, but multiple IPs decided to cause an edit war. I understand your request, however vandalism needs to be reverted immediately. ShadowBallX (talk) 01:09, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
The apology is meaningless if you believe the action was the right one to take. DoSazunielle (talk) 01:22, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
The user is WMF Globally Banned, and we will continue to revert their edits regardless of where it happens. Best, --IWI (talk) 01:52, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
@ImprovedWikiImprovment: The link you posted to meta does not work for me. Could you possibly link the actual page you were initially trying to link? ShadowBallX (talk) 01:57, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Done. It was a typo. --IWI (talk) 01:58, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Thanks. ShadowBallX (talk) 01:59, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Note about this user[change source]

This user is currently indef blocked on enwiki for disruptive editing, and is apparently a sock of User:623mutaNadu (who has not edited here). The reason I say apparently is that there was a discussion about if they are a sock or not. See here for more details. ShadowBallX (talk) 01:50, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

There is no need for messages like this to be left on their talk page really ShadowBallX. What a user does elsewhere is of little concern to us, but can be seen in the CA of any user. Best, --IWI (talk) 10:48, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Category:Venezuelan women[change source]

An editor has requested deletion of Category:Venezuelan women, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2021/Category:Venezuelan women and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. Auntof6 (talk) 05:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Category:Caribbean women[change source]

An editor has requested deletion of Category:Caribbean women, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2021/Category:Caribbean women and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. Auntof6 (talk) 05:09, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021[change source]

Hello! Thank you for creating Category:Pan-Africanism. However, we normally need at least three pages in a category before it is created. Because categories are a way to group together similar articles, there is no need to create a new category for just one or two articles. If you think there might be more pages to add to the new category, please add them now. Thank you. Auntof6 (talk) 05:11, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Matea Bolívar[change source]

An editor has requested deletion of Matea Bolívar, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2021/Matea Bolívar and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. Eptalon (talk) 11:03, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

RfD nomination of 1949 (library)[change source]

An editor has requested deletion of 1949 (library), an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2021/1949 (library) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. --IWI (talk) 16:49, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

RfD nomination of The Elephant[change source]

An editor has requested deletion of The Elephant, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2021/The Elephant and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. --IWI (talk) 09:03, 18 March 2021 (UTC)