User talk:Eihel/2021
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Your comment[change source]
I happen to disagree that is someone is admin on another Wikipedia Project, that it grants them admin status here upon their RFA. Even if they are an admin, we need to see that they can follow the rules of the individual Wikipedia itself and gain trust from that Wikipedia's community --Tsugaru Let's Talk! :) 🍁 21:22, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hello first @つがる:, 1) I am not an administrator on other projects. 2) I have over 1200 modifications here. 3) I started making modifications here over 2 years ago and like you who started on another wiki. 4) My opinion is going in the same direction as you. 5) This intervention is as incongruous as that of the candidate. As a reminder, accounts can vote and anonymous can leave a comment. —Eihel (talk) 01:15, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hi, on the RFA, You wrote "You are new in Wikimedia. If you were an administrator on other projects or made administrative edits, it would be different. Your request lacks a motivation: why do you want to become an admin? This page gives you the functions of an administrator..." I'm saying, as in reference to your qoute
'If you were an administrator on other projects or made adminstrative edits, it would be different', If in this case, if they were an administrator in a different Wikipedia, this doesn't grant them a 'support' vote just because of this, they would need to gain trust in the Wikipedia they were applying for the admin role in. This is what I was saying in reference to your quote. Thanks. --Tsugaru Let's Talk! :) 🍁 01:43, 17 March 2021 (UTC)- Ah ok sorry @つがる:. But that doesn't detract from my comment: if the candidate were a recognized administrator in another project, especially enwp, I would have qualms about voting against a candidate with just under 1000 contributions. This is the meaning I wanted to give to the submitter. —Eihel (talk) 01:56, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Just noting (I won't directly name the candidate) that we once had an user from EN WP, and in their case they were an Administrator and Oversighter (As I recall) on EN WP. They filed an RFA here upon arrival, and it got closed as a WP:SNOW. --Tsugaru Let's Talk! :) 🍁 02:03, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Ah ok sorry @つがる:. But that doesn't detract from my comment: if the candidate were a recognized administrator in another project, especially enwp, I would have qualms about voting against a candidate with just under 1000 contributions. This is the meaning I wanted to give to the submitter. —Eihel (talk) 01:56, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hi, on the RFA, You wrote "You are new in Wikimedia. If you were an administrator on other projects or made administrative edits, it would be different. Your request lacks a motivation: why do you want to become an admin? This page gives you the functions of an administrator..." I'm saying, as in reference to your qoute
Please remember to sign when you leave messages[change source]
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Just in case you didn't know, when you post messages on talkpages and Wikipedia pages, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ("~~~~") at the end of your message. You can also click on the signature button (
or 
), located in the edit toolbar, which is above the change window. This will put a signature containing your user name or IP address and the time you posted the message. This information is useful because other users will be able to tell who said what, and when. Pages that may require a signature, such as User talk:2601:586:280:7420:A9D5:E259:9966:1BC6, User talk:86.162.67.35, User talk:2401:4900:547D:45A4:0:0:420:8D02. Thank you for your participation. --Cewbot (talk) 03:46, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello Eihel, I've declined your QD request for this page. It appears to be a redirect because the person isn't notable, so the page redirects to something they are known for. Note also that there's the same redirect on enwiki w:Brad Abrell. 
Thank you--Ferien (talk) 18:34, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for your reply. Ok, like you want, @Ferien:. My opinion: If people are not known, they have nothing to do with the project, imho. While people can be redirected to one page, they can also be redirected to other pages. Also, just because a project has the same thing doesn't mean it's a good reason. Using the same system, a page can have an infinite number of redirects (anything that cannot have a page is redirected to an existing page). Cordially. —Eihel (talk) 18:59, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Then that would be more of a matter for RfD than quick deletion, as it's still not a test page. Regards, --Ferien (talk) 10:09, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
That IP user's bad unblock requests[change source]
Usually, it's probably better to ignore unblock requests and let the admins handle them. It's not worth edit warring over, even when they're as bad as that was, and it can keep the admins from seeing the problem. The sooner we see it, the sooner we can revoke talk page access. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 23:11, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.