User talk:FD950

This is FD950's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to FD950.
Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (`~~~~`). New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite, and welcoming to new users Assume good faith Do not attack other users For disputes, please see our guideline

Welcome[change source]

Hello, FD950, and welcome to the Simple English Wikipedia! Thank you for your changes.

You may want to begin by reading these pages:

For some ideas of pages to work on, read Wikipedia:Requested pages or the list of wanted pages.

You can change any pages you want! Any changes you make can be seen right away. You can ask questions at Wikipedia:Simple talk. At the end of your messages on talk pages, please sign your name by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will show your username and the date.

If you need help just click here and type {{helpme}} and your question and someone will reply to you shortly.

Good luck and happy changing! RPBG 💬 🖊 05:23, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback[change source]

Hi! I've noticed that you revert vandalism quite a bit but don't have the rollback flag. I have added you to the rollback group so you can use rollback instead of undo. Cheers! fr33k man 19:13, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Revert war[change source]

I recommend you not do it as you did here. You could instead just report it to ANI and wait for an admin to deal with the situation. A revert war doesn't solve a problem, and sometimes just makes it worse.--BRP^ever 06:52, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know, I will keep that in mind next time. FD950 (talk) 07:26, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting admin to moderate/ deal with the vandalism problem with the Simple Wikipedia Generation articles[change source]

Hello there. I suggest that the Simple English Wikipedia articles for Generation X, Millennial, Generation Z, and Generation Alpha follow the same guidelines as those from the main English site. Admins there have concluded with only allowing official government citations and certain key institutions such as Pew Research to filter out disruptive editing and vandalism, and to provide a factual reading experience. Much of the edits in these Simple Wikipedia articles have dubious citations, with bad-faith statements (for example stating that Pew ending Gen X at 1979 or that there many governmental sources that have 1996-2011 as the Gen Z date range, when this isn't the case). There are multiple citations that come from irrelevant sources (which will allow editors to put any date range they choose, thus pointing out the bias problem). I have already made edits to remove these, but I believe that it is important to inform to you about this and to allow you to make the decision. I assert that Simple Wikipedia should follow the same guidelines as the main site in order to avoid it becoming a pop-culture Fandom website with bias/disruptive editing and to rid of these editing wars. 2601:940:C180:3DB0:3479:663B:C07F:F9DC (talk) 01:51, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IP editor we are two different Wikipedia’s and what applies on one does not always apply to the other. I highly recommend you stop cross posting to talk pages with this as you have already been given a warning by a sysop. Thanks - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 15:32, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]