User talk:Ferien/Archives/2021/February

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hey

Please don't undo my notices to users. I would appreciate it. Instead please bring it to my talk page or yours with a TB. Otherwise, it shows we are not a community. As far as that user goes, it is more than likely a sockpuppet which is why I tagged it to see what they did. Thanks! PotsdamLamb (talk) 16:32, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah ok, sorry, the page just didn't meet the QD U2 criteria, as the user did exist. I will bring things like this to your talk page in the future. Thanks, --Belwine💬📜 16:36, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! PotsdamLamb (talk) 16:39, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@PotsdamLamb: Actually they were correct in removing the QD tag. Anyone may remove QD tags that are not appropriate. It is very much appreciated when people do so, so that it does not waste administrators time removing them. U2 was not appropriate in this case. -Djsasso (talk) 16:43, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I got that. Thanks DJSasso. PotsdamLamb (talk) 16:44, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thoughts

What are your thoughts on this page? To me I am not used to seeing a page about a movie that just lists the actors.

Om Shanti Om

Thanks - PotsdamLamb (talk) 16:52, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, the cast section is really long. I noticed the plot section was removed as it was too complicated, so that's probably why it's in the situation it's in right now. The plot section was actually just as complicated as the English Wikipedia, so I'm glad it's removed! I think the article would need some simplification before more expansion. Thanks, --Belwine💬📜 17:01, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, that is kind of what I thought. I will add it to my personal white list for a month and see what happens to it. Thanks again. PotsdamLamb (talk) 17:10, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, have a good rest of your day --Belwine💬📜 18:05, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vadim's article

Hello , im wondering is there anything i can improve on this article , instead of deleting :) , i wrote this in favor of an actor who passed away at 17 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annjasrojo (talkcontribs) 17:14, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. There is nothing you can really do to improve the article for it to not be deleted, unfortunately the subject doesn't seem notable enough. However, feel free to improve it by adding more (in Simple English). The RfD discussion is here if you are interested. Thanks! --Belwine💬📜 18:05, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

22:38, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Addressing uncategorized pages

Hi, Belwine. When you add one or more categories to a page that is marked as uncategorized, please try to categorize it fully instead of adding just one category. You added the Italian historian category to Loris Zanatta, but there are other categories that should be there: take a look at the ones I just added for examples.

When you add just one category to get a page out of the uncategorized category, it makes it less likely that anyone will find that page and add other categories that should be there.

Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 12:16, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks. I'll admit that adding categories isn't something I'm best at, so when adding categories in the future, I'll make sure to add more categories. Thanks, --Belwine💬📜 12:50, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Some basic ones for people are:
  • Year of birth (or decade or century, if that's as close as you can get) - or one of the year-of-birth-unknown type categories
  • Year of death (or decade or century, if that's as close as you can get) - or either 1) Living people or 2) year of death unknown
  • Category(ies) for their nationality and/or place of origin. Be as specific as possible: we have "people from" categories for cities in some cases.
  • Category(ies) for their profession
  • Category(ies) for anything else they're notable for (why do we care about them?)
Sometimes these categories can be combined. For example, you would use Category:American writers instead of separate categories for Americans and writers. A read-through of the article might give you other ideas of categories that can be included.
Hope that helps. --Auntof6 (talk) 13:03, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I'll add this section to my links so if I'm unsure about categories, I'll go here. --Belwine💬📜 13:05, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

QD nomination of Vikidia

I told the anonymous editor that the page had been nominated for QD, but when I inserted the template on their talk page, there were a few issues with it. Please view. Thank you. - -KirkburnFandom (talk) 04:56, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I fixed it eventually but it took me a while. I'd recommend using Twinkle to semi-automate the process. It will put the template on the page, let the editor know the page is nominated for QD and, if you want, log it in your QD log. Thanks, --Belwine💬📜 08:11, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@KirkburnFandom:, but remember, using Twinkle is your full responsibility. If any thing goes wrong, you may face problems. You have to take this responsibility. So remember to use it properly and carefully. Use your Special:Preferences for using Twinkle. Best--DJRC (talk) 08:17, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay then. I will add the QD nomination in the log. Thank you. KirkburnFandom (talk) 16:10, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have got mail!

Hello, Ferien. You have a new email! Please check it at your convenience.
Message added 15:57, 3 February 2021 (UTC). You can take off this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

--IWI (talk) 15:57, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done --Belwine💬📜 15:58, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Archive

My talk page archive process is not working. Can you please check and changed if possible? I had to archive it after 5 to 6 days.DJRC (talk) 16:26, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think your code is fine, just the bot (SassoBot) hasn't archived it yet. You can archive it manually, or wait a few days. You can check with Djsasso to see what the issue is, they might be able to help. Thanks, --Belwine💬📜 16:31, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks.DJRC (talk) 16:48, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikibreak

Talkback

Hello, Ferien. You have new messages at PotsdamLamb's talk page.
Message added 18:35, 4 February 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

PotsdamLamb (talk) 18:35, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Belwine💬📜 19:30, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Btw, in future, you can just bring this to my talk page instead of using talkback if you want to. I am happy to answer any questions here. --Belwine💬📜 15:56, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cecil Rhodes

Thanks for changing it. I was about to do it although you reverted and it was to be going about change conflict. Thanks again.DJRC (talk) 11:40, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Change conflicts are annoying, I had one with Operator873 the other day... I thought I had reverted something, then I warned the user and there were two level 1 warnings there, I got really confused.. --Belwine💬📜 11:41, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm ok.DJRC (talk) 11:42, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail!

Hello, Ferien. You have a new email! Please check it at your convenience.
Message added 13:04, 6 February 2021 (UTC). You can take off this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

--*Fehufangą✉ Talk page13:04, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I'm currently on mobile and will respond soon. - - Belwine💬📜 13:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the delay -  Done --Belwine💬📜 15:31, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WARNING ⚠️

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make changes here. But pages should not be moved without a good reason. They need to have a name that is accurate and simple, and that people will recognize. Wikipedia has some guidelines to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if users are talking about moving a page, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you have a question about this, please ask on Simple talk. Thank you. on Page Jobanjit Singh. Canthewikiman (talk) 19:54, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see "Wikipedia:No personal attacks". Talk about changes editors have made, not the editors. Personal attacks damage the community and scare away users. Please note that more personal attacks will lead to you being blocked for disruption. Thank you. Canthewikiman (talk) 19:55, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Canthewikiman: ? - I am not personally attacking anyone here, I am simply explaining why I nominated the page for quick deletion. I'm also not moving any page. The page is clearly advertising, and saying this is not a personal attack... --Belwine💬📜 19:58, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nope you need to research news first as you told freepreesjournal doesn't work. It's clearly working here as your intentions are wrong here. Canthewikiman (talk) 19:59, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's not personal attacking, look, it doesn't work, there is a 404 error. --Belwine💬📜 20:01, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

add m. Instead of www. There Canthewikiman (talk) 20:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Canthewikiman: Yes, but the source you added to the article was www. I am just following the sources you added to the article. --Belwine💬📜 20:04, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I added m. I don't know how source got changed d magically Canthewikiman (talk) 20:04, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Canthewikiman: However, the subject of the page just isn't notable enough for Wikipedia, and the page is clearly advertising. Also, I think en:WP:BLP1E applies here. Thanks, --Belwine💬📜 20:10, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally Times Of India's article isn't an interview it is the proper article where editor haven't played Q&A with him. Canthewikiman (talk) 20:09, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nope en:WP:BLP1E doesn't applies here as article isn't related as same subject. Do you know what doesn BLP1E refers to? Can you explain? Canthewikiman (talk) 20:12, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Canthewikiman: Let's just go back to basics: what I nominated the article for quick deletion in the first place.
  1. G11 - obvious advertising. The article emphasises that Singh is the founder of VS Records, and there is a huge en:WP:REFBOMB for that too.
  2. A4 - doesn't claim to be notable. Just founding a company does not make you notable. Let's say I founded the charity shop in town - does that make me notable? No. Simply founding a company does not make you notable.
Ok, now on the subject of BLP1E. en:WP:BLP1E says " We generally should avoid having an article if reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event." - all sources generally seem to talk about VS Records and Singh together. That is the main thing he is known for. So, I think (99% sure), that BLP1E applies here, but that is not really very important and G11 and A4 also apply. Thanks, --Belwine💬📜 20:21, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I've created new Page Ch Moazzam Ishaq. Can you check if it's eligible or pass wp:actor to be here on wikipedia? Canthewikiman (talk) 21:37, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've missed many sources to add there as well as his filmography too. If you don't mind will you help in that? As you're good at researching stuff. Canthewikiman (talk) 21:43, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty good article in terms of the way it is written, but he doesn't appear to be notable, sorry. I have nominated for RfD, so there can be a discussion about it. Thanks, --Belwine💬📜 22:13, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help!

Dear @Belwine:, If you dont mind can you help me to add CU Request for User @Gunungkinabalu144: in Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser Page.?? This is the Archive case of other socks so I think this is also a sockpuppet Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/FishMara/Archive Thanks. --BubblySnow  💬 13:49, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, who do you think Gunungkinabalu144 is a sock of? --Belwine💬📜 13:52, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I think so, User is registered before two days and suddenly today user has created page Christinna Khan but when I check the English wikipedia log i found that page with same was created several of times by many user and now that all users are blocked so, I think this user is also a sock. Thanks BubblySnow  💬 14:00, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But there only seems to be one user who has edited the page, so I don't think a RFCU is necessary. --Belwine💬📜 14:58, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

17:41, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Rollback

Congratulations to you for getting rollback rights. I believe you will use it without misleading it. Best of luck....DJRC (talk) 08:45, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I will obviously only use it for undoing obvious vandalism and my own edits. --Belwine💬📜 14:57, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
I saw all of the Recent Changes work you have done, and I wanted to award this to you. Helpthepeople9 (talk) 18:57, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate the barnstar, thank you! --Belwine💬📜 19:24, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yup! Helpthepeople9 - TALK 19:27, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Have removed a new reference

Your last edit in Sanamahism has removed one of the reference, which is not in the citation. It's not doubled. Please revert it. Haoreima (talk) 15:30, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I removed one (this one) as it appeared to be an online shop, which is not really a source. For citing a book, you can use the {{cite book}} template. Thanks, Belwine💬📜 15:33, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

😁oh, sorry! Haoreima (talk) 15:38, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's ok :) --Belwine💬📜 15:41, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talk Page Templates

Hi. How do you put talk page templates at the top of your talk page? Twonkietonk (talk) 16:16, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I use {{Usertalkback|you=watched}}, {{Talk header}} and {{annual readership}} at the top of my talk page. Just add those to the top of your talk page. Thanks, --Belwine💬📜 16:22, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the tip. I really appreciated that very much. Twonkietonk (talk) 16:25, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No problem --Belwine💬📜 16:38, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move

Could you please move the page Khuman kingdom into Khuman Leipaak? Haoreima (talk) 18:33, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - Note you can move pages yourself by going to "More" at the top of the page and pressing "Move". —Belwine💬📜 21:09, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Belwine: Unfortunately, my gadget doesn't display any of the "more" section in the screen. But after all, I will take best care while naming an article in future so that I may not disturb you frequently in future. Haoreima (talk) 15:23, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, you can use simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MovePage/PAGE, with PAGE being the page you want to move. —Belwine (talk) 15:25, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How can I thank you for always helping me in my doubtful times? Haoreima (talk) 15:39, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Answer

Hi, Belwine! Thank you for cookies. I like cookies! Bonzg (talk) 14:25, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No problem :)
Happy editing! —Belwine💬📜 14:26, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chat

Hey, are you on the IRC channel or discord? If you want to keep it pvt, just email me.

Thanks, PotsdamLamb (talk) 17:52, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. No, I don't go on the IRC channels or Discord for Wikipedia. If you want to contact me privately, then obviously feel free to email. Thanks, Belwine (talk) 17:54, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
ah ok no worries PotsdamLamb (talk) 18:02, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, sorry. Always feel free to email though, as I do have it enabled. Belwine (talk) 20:46, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

mass rollback

Once clicked, it will prompt for a reason, then when you okay, I believe it will rollback all 50-150 recent edits. Been awhile since I used it. --Tsugaru Let's Talk! :) 🍁 21:31, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ah ok, thanks. :) —Belwine (talk) 21:32, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Trust me, you don't want to rollback a vandalbot's edit manually, I did it, and my hand hurt after, and when I found out about this script, I didn't know to react ;) --Tsugaru Let's Talk! :) 🍁 21:37, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, mass rollback would be really useful in that situation. Must have been painful doing it manually... Belwine (talk) 21:41, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
Is my signature against Wikipedia's policy of signatures? --Tsugaru Let's Talk! :) 🍁 22:25, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. Mine was really bright red and had emojis, and someone had an issue with it, so I changed it. I think yours is ok personally. --Belwine (talk) 22:28, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"A" QD criteria

Please not these only apply to the mainspace, and can't be used to delete talk pages. The "G" criteria are the ones that can be used in all namespaces. Thanks, --IWI (talk) 16:06, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok.. They appear in Twinkle, which is why I used it. Then again, Twinkle shows A3 as just "Article that exists on another Wikimedia project". Thanks for the information, Belwine (talk) 16:09, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well this is valid, I will suggest why not we tweak the TW to only allow A criterions to be tagged when namespace is article. A3 isn't to be used for talk/user spaces as they might be confused about not having sandboxes and use those to simplify. However, if there isn't attribution, I will think it should meets G12. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 17:16, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note that Twinkle only shows A criteria for articles and article talk pages. And about A3, it just shows "Article that exists on another Wikimedia project", when in reality, it is article that has not been simplified that exists on another Wikimedia project. Belwine (talk) 17:19, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I will think limiting to Article alone will be beneficial. Actually Twinkle did have this bolded part, just not on the main menu, notice the "?" beside the criterion, hover your mouse over that and this part is shown. We can tweak to show the whole portion if is better? I had started a thread on ST so we might as well add to there, thanks :) Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 17:24, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, if I have anything else to say, I'll add there. Belwine (talk) 17:26, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

xx — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr.Wriggle (talkcontribs) 15:30, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a problem? JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 12:35, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

17:55, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

One Long List

Hello, Ferien. You have new messages at PotsdamLamb's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
 Done --Belwine (talk) 19:03, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dat Articler

Hey, I feel that Loss aversion is more of a wikt item and not really for wp. The reason being it is the definition of what it is, with no sources and no real explanation or anything deep about it. Thoughts? --PotsdamLamb (talk) 21:54, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I feel like it is ok, it is a little more than a dictionary definition. Note the article I recently nominated for deletion, see here, had one sentence, but was expanded quite easily, and everybody said keep. --Belwine (talk) 22:23, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I would have voted to keep on that too because I know there is a lot of information on that topic.  :) PotsdamLamb (talk) 22:32, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There is lots of information on the English Wikipedia here. I'm sure it could be expanded further. --Belwine (talk) 09:44, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your change to Notes on Nationalism

This change you made removed a needed template to display notes. Please watch out for pages that need both reference and notes displays. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 00:26, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, apologies. --Belwine (talk) 09:43, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Last warnings

About this change you made: when there is already a last warning on the page, it doesn't help to leave another last warning. It just makes it look like the last warnings don't mean anything. The action to take if the user continues the problem edits is to report at VIP. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 19:29, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I gave a level 4 warning again as I was unsure whether the level 4 warning from IWI was necessary - I just saw that it went from level 2 to level 4. However, I should have really done a level 2 warning then a level 3 warning, instead of two level 2 warnings, so I understand why IWI warned level 4 now.
Also, are welcomes level 1 warnings or are they like level 0 warnings? Thanks. --Belwine (talk) 19:45, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Welcomes are not warnings at all. Neither are notices that a page has been nominated for QD or RFD. --Auntof6 (talk) 20:13, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I'll always make sure that I start on level 1 after welcomes.
Whilst QD notices do not count as warnings, I assume these do count as warnings.
Thanks, --Belwine (talk) 20:22, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 (change conflict)  There is no firm rules on how users should be warned, it is just advised they at least receive some warnings before a block happens, except with LTAs, socks, and obvious vandal only accounts. Generally, logged-in users can be blocked with fewer warnings than IPs as we know they are connected to one person. It can sometimes become clear quickly that an account has been created for spam or vandalism only. There is no rule that says you must give the four warnings before a block. You don't even have to use the template warnings, though it is probably the best method. --IWI (talk) 20:24, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@ImprovedWikiImprovment: While that is true, when I look at the VIP entries, I want to see more than just a final or only warning, except in cases of things like personal attacks, legal threats, etc. The idea is to try to encourage people to be constructive contributors by giving them a chance to see that there's a limit to what we'll tolerate instead of blocking them for their first edit. Some people (and I've seen this in the business world) think they can do whatever they want just because they're allowed to edit here. The warnings are designed to explain that that's not the case, starting with lower-level warnings ("Hey, guy, that's not cool, there are rules here") and graduating to higher-level ones ("OK, we've given you chances to clean up your act: if you keep this up we'll block you.") --Auntof6 (talk) 20:34, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Belwine: Yes, those count as warnings. --Auntof6 (talk) 20:34, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
Ok, thanks for the information. --Belwine (talk) 20:26, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Auntof6: I agree completely, I was just pointing out the four warnings aren't to die by, and I often start at level 2 or higher for more serious vandals. Accounts being created and immediatley making personal attacks should be blocked without comment, as you said. In run-of-the-mill vandals, I would typically give 4 warnings with the hope they will make helpful changes instead. --IWI (talk) 20:38, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Ferien. You have new messages at PotsdamLamb's talk page.
Message added 23:36, 18 February 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

PotsdamLamb (talk) 23:36, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Belwine (talk) 10:52, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Ferien. You have new messages at PotsdamLamb's talk page.
Message added 04:54, 20 February 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

PotsdamLamb (talk) 04:54, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 DoneBelwine (talk) 10:04, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

YGM

Hello, Ferien. You have a new email! Please check it at your convenience.
You can take off this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.
Thank you.  Done - read and replied. —Belwine (talk) 21:35, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

VIP Board

Hey Belwine - You should not be reverting the VIP board, they still need to be reported and put into the archives so there is a record of it. Only admins should be deleting anything off of there. I deleted two things last night which were my own because of a huggle configuration error and they fixed it. Thanks PotsdamLamb (talk) 21:48, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to note that there are no archives on VIP. I mainly reverted it because the user has been confirmed as a sock of an LTA on Commons, and the user was already blocked here when you reported.
Sometimes, LTAs go on VIP, and it is not very fun, so I reverted your entry to prevent LTAs from responding. I don't think this LTA is very active here though, so I'm fine with you keeping the report there for now. —Belwine (talk) 21:51, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well whomever they are is about to get it from EN; look at link on VIP PotsdamLamb (talk) 21:55, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar Notice

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Thanks for having my back and keeping watch over me and my edits and all of your helpfulness. PotsdamLamb (talk) 23:32, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the barnstar :)
Also, thank you for your edits that you've been doing recently - you have become a helpful editor here, please keep it up! —Belwine (talk) 09:23, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Short description

In general English Wikipedia, the Short description of an article can be entered by using template { { Short description | XYZ ABC } } but in simple Wikipedia, how can we do that? I found the very template useless. Besides, the short description given in Sanamahi is totally wrong, who did that? I want to know! Can I manage these things too? Please help me! Haoreima (talk) 05:50, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I don't think we have short descriptions here. I think we get them from Wikidata. —Belwine (talk) 08:10, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

By short description, I mean a few lines which are highlighted just below the title of the article. For example, Helen of Troy, has a highlight "Daughter of Zeus". Like that one, in the page Sanamahi too. I want to know how it's added or edited? Haoreima (talk) 10:33, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Haoreima: As Belwine states, we take those from Wikidata. --IWI (talk) 10:50, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Go to Wikidata and search for the article you want to add the short description to. Then, add a description to the "Description" part. —Belwine (talk) 10:51, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks for the info. And 😔sorry for asking once more. Haoreima (talk) 10:56, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's alright - you can always ask me if you need help :) —Belwine (talk) 10:59, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

00:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Final Warning

This is your final warning. If you continue to edit Wikipedia and revert vandalism like you have been, you will become addicted. Haha! 😬 Hope today was good. I see you’ve been busy. Sorry I wasn’t around today I had to attend training and renew a couple of my state certifications for work. I should be around tomorrow a little bit. I’m on graveyards for the next three weeks until my COVID-19, 20, and 21 (and 22) vaccination is complete. PotsdamLamb (talk) 04:32, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think I already am!
A Wikibreak will be coming up relatively soon, don't worry :) —Belwine (talk) 08:24, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
oh, on another note. See #Tech News: 2021-08, this may have been the issue you were facing here. —Belwine (talk) 13:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I saw that. I will revisit that at some point. :) PotsdamLamb (talk) 16:24, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User account

Will deleting my user account from general English Wikipedia affect to my account in simple English Wikipedia?

And, Can anyone block a Wikipedia user who is already retired? Haoreima (talk) 05:48, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Haoreima: - No one can delete an account, not even you. See en:Wikipedia:Username_policy#Deleting_and_merging_accounts. You will see some options available to you. The account is a universal account. Once you log into any Wikipedia your account is automatically created. So say you are logged in now to simple and you go to the Spanish Wikipedia your account is automatically created. I highly recommend you do not create multiple accounts. This can lead to very bad things if you get blocked for anything. As far as blocking, only administrators and higher can block an account. Typically retired users are not blocked. See en:Wikipedia:Blocking_policy for the entire policy about blocking. I hope this has helped you. PotsdamLamb (talk) 06:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry want to also provide you this link as well https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Unified_login PotsdamLamb (talk) 06:53, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, do you think they are not significant in terms of being doublers?If you can help me expand the article to stay on Wikipedia.--منع الواقع (talk) 10:44, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was searching up online and I couldn't find any news articles, or anything that showed notability. Please feel free to discuss on the Request for Deletion here. —Belwine (talk) 10:46, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I have completed the article and added many sources to it. Do you think it is not suitable for publication now?--MNL (talk) 15:32, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, the subject does not appear to be notable enough for Wikipedia. Sorry. Even these references are only brief mentions and not solely based on him, and the ones based on him appear to be primary sources. Best, —Belwine (talk) 15:49, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You are right, I tried to get all the sources, and again, if I find a source that can be referred to, I will add it. Maybe I will launch a poll to create it later, but I do not think I will be able to do it soon.--MNL (talk) 15:59, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, maybe when the subject of the article is notable enough, the article can be created. —Belwine (talk) 16:00, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou

(To Belwine) Thankyou for your support and suggestions, Next time I will give my best. ThankYou! @MrManasharma MrManasharma (talk) 15:01, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I just reverted your edits as the article made sense before. Best, —Belwine (talk) 15:02, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@MrManasharma: This change just makes the article make less sense. We don't have to use "the", "are" and "a" in everything, and definitely not here. —Belwine (talk) 15:13, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Belwine: There is no sense of sentence without these words.So why these changes are not matter. I think that with my these types of changes there is no any effect on any article... MrManasharma (talk) 15:20, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The sentence definitely does make sense without your addition.
"Basic English (Business Academic Scientific International Commercial) is a controlled language used to explain the complex thoughts." We don't need to use "the" here. Not every noun needs to have a "the" or "a" behind it.
"Some articles are in the Simple English Wikipedia use only Basic English." This addition made the sentence make no sense. It is unclear whether it is saying "Some articles are in the Simple English Wikipedia. Use only Basic English." or "Some articles in the Simple English use only Basic English." Best, —Belwine (talk) 15:29, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question

People may already asked this(maybe),but why does some colors in the color shades template link to a non existent article called shades of (*color name*) ?12345678910FruitTalk(My Changes) 12:44, 27 February 2021 (UTC) sorry for asking[reply]

@12345678910Fruit: Can you show me an example of this so I can look further? Thanks, —Belwine (talk) 12:46, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Belwine: In the shades of cyan template,the color Ice blue links to "Shades of cyan".

12345678910FruitTalk(My Changes) 12:50, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see. I don't know for sure why this is, but I am guessing it is because these are on the "Shades of cyan" page on the English Wikipedia. Thanks, —Belwine (talk) 12:52, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

/* Nationalmusiq */ descussion

hey dear am here to talk about the deletion of Nationalmusiq wikipedia page i a have my opion on it i would like you to hear — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sammykingstown (talkcontribs) 21:44, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) You should state it on the RFD page for Nationalmusiq, so your argument/point on the article can be seen. --Tsugaru Let's Talk! :) 🍁 21:45, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 (change conflict)  Ok. I think it'd be better to voice your opinion on the request for deletion here, as it keeps everything in one place, and can help people participating in the RfD. —Belwine (talk) 21:47, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

okay thank you but about the article i have read it and it is intresting i think the article can stay so more information can be added to it or editior who knows about him can fix it up for him what are your thoughts — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sammykingstown (talkcontribs) 21:52, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the subject of the article isn't notable, and so the article should be deleted, hence why I nominated it for quick deletion earlier. —Belwine (talk) 21:54, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

do you work on wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sammykingstown (talkcontribs) 21:57, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It depends what you are saying. I edit here to build the encyclopedia, yes, but I do not work for the Wikimedia Foundation. I don't see how this is relevant though? —Belwine (talk) 21:59, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

okay so why do you request the article to be delete? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sammykingstown (talkcontribs) 22:02, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I requested the article to be deleted because it does not meet the general notability guideline, and it could have been deleted under quick delete reason A4. However, as the article has been deleted quite a few times already, Eptalon sent the article to requests for deletion, where the article will be discussed about for a week, and the community will choose to either delete, keep, or do something else with the article. —Belwine (talk) 22:04, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay can the article be fix up in the mean while — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sammykingstown (talkcontribs) 22:09, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, the article can be improved during the RfD. Best, —Belwine (talk) 22:10, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

okay you say you edit things and build wiki what is your oppion on the fix up of the article

Stats

How can I count the number of articles I have created in this Wikipedia? Is there any stats page of Wikipedia users? Haoreima (talk) 12:02, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See this. It's your contributions, but it only includes new pages that you have created in the main space. Note it also includes redirects. If you just count all of those (apart from the redirects) then you can get the number of articles you have created. This is the way I do it, there may be another way to do it. Best, —Belwine (talk) 12:17, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fortunately, I found it. Actually, I was talking about this one. https://simple.wikiscan.org/utilisateur/Haoreima By the way, thanks for reply. Haoreima (talk) 13:01, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, ok. I have never seen that before. That may be useful for me in the future. Thanks. —Belwine (talk) 13:03, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

👍👍😃 Haoreima (talk) 13:18, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nostalgia Wikipedia

Can I edit and contribute to Nostalgia Wikipedia just like I did in Simple English Wikipedia? Haoreima (talk) 16:08, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

nostalgia.wikipedia.org cannot be edited. It is just for nostalgia. —Belwine (talk) 16:12, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks. Haoreima (talk) 16:15, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]