User talk:Filper01

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Filper01 (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)


Request reason:

What did I do wrong

Decline reason:

Sockpuppet of a banned user. -- Kennedy (talk) 11:00, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are a sock puppet of Tharnton345. We don't allow that sort of thing here. An admin will be along shortly and give you a decision; which will likely be, no! fr33kman t - c 05:38, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Fr33kman is correct. I have refused your unblocking. Regards Kennedy (talk) 11:00, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Filper01 (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)


Request reason:

This account hasn't made any vandalism, so no reason to block.

Decline reason:

Whether sockpuppets have vandalised or not, we block them. Unblock denied. -- Fairfield Deleted? 14:05, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you read the messages above? Your are a sockpuppet of a banned user. You don't get unblocked. Barras (talk) 11:57, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no! I'll get blocked on en as well. GODDBYE SIMPLE ENGLISH WIKIPEDIA FOREVER! Filper01 (Chat, My contribs) 16:59, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ask and you shall receive. Either way (talk) 17:03, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Filper01 (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)


Request reason:

I am really sorry. I will not make any bad edits at all and I fear that I may be blocked on other wikis like fr:wiki and de:wiki.

Decline reason:

You already know the reason. Djsasso (talk) 22:53, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're not going to be unblocked. You have been banned by the community and are now making sockpuppets. Just stop asking. Goblin 17:39, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You must HATE me, right? Filper01 (Chat, My contribs) 17:55, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, we do. Because you need to understand that you are not going to be able to re-edit here. If you just waited until the Community Ban was lifted we might /consider/ it, but if you keep creating sockpuppets, then yes, we hate you. Goblin 18:03, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You hate me for real? Really? That's a personal attack. We do not allow these, sorry. Filper01 (Chat, My contribs) 18:18, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Filper/Tharnton: Whatever you want to be called: no, it's not a PA, because you asked me, and no, i don't hate you for real: I hate the fact that you can't be mature enough and just understand that you are blocked, and sockpuppetery will not help that. And "we do not allow these"? You're not part of the community - you have been banned. Goblin 18:21, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]