User talk:Hammad/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, Hammadsaeed. I noticed that you created Category:1451 deaths. You probably didn't know, but for some categories we have templates that are used when the categories are created. Categories for deaths in a year are some of these. I changed the category you created to use the normal setup for these categories. Any time you create a category that is part of a series, it's a good idea to look at similar categories to see how they were set up. If you have any questions about this, feel free to let me know. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:32, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Auntof6 I have another question which i left on your talk page can you tell me one thing about how to write this "saint, philosopher, poet, and qalandar" written below the name on this page https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lal_Shahbaz_Qalandar

or written on other pages how to write this??? Hammadsaeed (talk 04:37, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you're asking. --Auntof6 (talk) 09:14, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Auntof6 which type of templates use can you paste here and answer above question please thankyou Hammadsaeed (talk 08:37 , 9 March 2017 (AST)

I don't understand what you're asking here, either. --Auntof6 (talk) 09:14, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lal_Shahbaz_Qalandar in below the name saint, philosopher, poet, and qalandar is written how to write this. Hammadsaeed (talk 09:19, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

thankyou but now i understand how to write Label Hammadsaeed (talk) 02:49, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

EnglishWiki

Auntof6 Just to let you know, this editor was blocked on the English Wikipedia following an SPI case of their use of multiple accounts to feign consensus at an AfD, as well as per WP:CIR. I also noticed that they created the same page page here, after the consensus of deletion was established.Boomer Vial (talk) 07:59, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Boomer Vial

sir this time i provide every athentic evidence or reference on Simple wiki thank your sir and sir you know on wiki english there was probelm of Sock puppetry not the notability Hammadsaeed (talk) 07:59, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is what is meant by a failure of WP:CIR. If you were indeed in any way competent, you would understand that the article in question was deleted due to a failure to establish notability. You were too busy creating socks in an ill-attempt to save the article, without bothering to understand why it was nominated for deletion, in the first place. Boomer Vial (talk) 08:15, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sir Boomer Vial

on the basis of the Geo TV material, and BBC.many other books references make this page notable it should be keep per WP:NGEO Hammadsaeed (talk) 08:20, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It was already explained that this in it's self was not good enough to sway consensus on the English Wikipedia to keep the article. It was about the same time this was explained that you decided to go the sockpuppet route. I'm done conversing to someone who does not bother to understand the policies, why the exist, and how they work in conjunction with other policies and guidelines, and only quotes them when they feel it serves a purpose to help them, as in this case to save an article you mainly contributed to. [User:Boomer Vial|Boomer Vial]] (talk) 08:34, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Boomer Vial but i not did sock puppetry here now i understand the policies and i think Saint page make it self notable and for further notability references please visit the page(article). Hammadsaeed (talk) 08:37, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hammadsaeed First of all, I want to apologize for not assuming good faith (in terms of my saying that you are not competent to edit on Wikipedia, as well as my claiming that the sources you included were insufficient). I conferred with an editor who is more experienced with Urdu, and concluded that the references are sufficient to support notability for the article. I've struck out my above comments, and again apologize for my tone, and my claims of your non-competence. Boomer Vial (talk) 22:59, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Boomer Vial no sir i appreciate you,Its your duty ☺.But wait!!!!!! you are apologising here but your are still pursuing me on english version?? i like your apologising Style,is this Apologise?? you are insulting me on wikipedia by comment here and there globally.I called you sir and you are insulting me.Its your choice to keep the english version article or delete.Stop pursue please.Stay neutral don't take anything personally i think this is world war III for you,and i don't think you will never change your tone.Hammad Saeed (talk) 10:28, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You do not need to have any sort of tone with me, Hammad. This is the Simple English Wikipedia, which is not the same as the English Wikipedia from which you were blocked, and continue to be blocked from for sockpuppetry (as recent as today). I was being completely sincere in my apologizing to you, and I'm sorry if you cannot, or refuse to see that. I will continue to "pursue" you, so long as you continue in your sockpuppetry , and you deserve no apology for my doing so, as you are out of line with Wikipedia policies and guidelines by abusing multiple accounts. Also, thanks for confessing that the editor I suspected to be you, is indeed. Very helpful in preventing you from further disrupting the English version of Wikipedia. Boomer Vial (talk) 21:20, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Boomer Vial Sir sorry for above words but-HammadBot is not my sock puppet but its my bot???? you can open en:User:HammadBot and check last edits this is not my sock per Wikipedia:Bot policy-Hammadsaeed (talk) 01:47, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
you are blocked on English Wikipedia. That means you do not get to edit it at all. Even from a bot account. Only users in good standing get to use bots. Only (talk) 02:51, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ok Sir thankyouBoomer Vial as Only Sir point out i am blocked on English wikipedia and can't edit any thing even from a Bot,i don't have good standards to edit any thing,and again i want to apologize for my above comments and my misbehaviour.--Hammadsaeed (talk) 02:53, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Boomer Vial ?? Hammadsaeed (talk) 08:07, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bot information

Hello, Hammadsaeed. I noticed that this bot-named account was created today. You might not have known that we don't allow user names that contain "bot" unless they are actual bot accounts with the bot flag. Because of that, I have blocked the account. I'm sorry for any inconvenience this causes. If you wanted to ask for a bot flag for this account, please make your request at Wikipedia talk:Bots. If you have any questions about this, feel free to ask. --Auntof6 (talk) 05:15, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

how can i request i dont understand Hammadsaeed(talk) 05:18, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Look at the page I linked: it gives instructions for making the request. You will need to have specific things that you want to use the bot for. What do you plan to use it for? --Auntof6 (talk) 05:21, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ok Thank you File:Animalibrí.gif Hammadsaeed (talk) 05:23, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Categories and English Wikipedia links

Please do not add redlinked categories to articles. You seem to be copying the list of categories an article is in on the English Wikipedia and pasting it into the articles here. Only add categories if they also exist here.

Additionally, please do not replace redlinks in articles with links to the English Wikipedia articles. Instead, keep the redlinks here so that someone might turn it into an article here. Only (talk) 17:18, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Only Ok.😇 i'll never do this. Can i turn redlinks into pages ?? Hammadsaeed (talk) 17:26, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You can as long as they meet Simple Wikipedia's standards. But making articles that use English Wikipedia as references or YouTube videos will not be acceptable. Only (talk) 17:27, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ok Sir can i use any other website video???? Hammadsaeed (talk) 17:34, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Only Sir you removed Lahoot lamakan section. can i add this section again with reliable sources and i think you dont notice Sir i also give book reference too and other reference and can i add other sites video references like tune.pk or other??Hammadsaeed (talk) 17:42, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You must change your signature

Per Wikipedia:Signatures#Images, you must change your signature to get rid of the hummingbird that's in it. Please do this now before signing any new posts. Only (talk) 17:24, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But Sir i use this very rarely.Ok i'll never use this

thank you sir for informing me. Hammadsaeed (talk) 17:30, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanking people

Hi, Hammad. You've been using the "thank" function to thank me for a lot of things lately, and it's not necessary. I'd rather you didn't do it so often. Every time you do that, I get a notification that I have to go check. I'd appreciate it if you would only use the "thank" function to thank me for major things. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 05:17, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ok 😄 Hammadsaeed (talk) 05:25, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]