This user likes to kelp with Apple Computer related articles

User talk:Ipadguy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Ipadguy is Symbol neutral vote.svg Somewhere
User Page   Talk Page    

January 2016[change source]

Stop x nuvola.svg
You have been blocked indefinitely from changing Wikipedia in line with Wikipedia's blocking policy for in accordance with WP:ONESTRIKE, for being disruptive here while being indef'd at enwiki. If you think this block is unfair, you may ask to be unblocked by adding {{unblock|your reason here}} below. If you cannot do this or the reason is private, please send an e-mail to simple-admins-l@lists.wikimedia.org and an administrator will look at your reason and reply. You may want to read our guide to unblock requests before asking to be unblocked. Auntof6 (talk) 22:51, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
SemiTransBlack x.svg

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ipadguy (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)


Request reason:

Sorry I did not mean any harm

Decline reason:

Considering that you have been similarly warned on EN regarding this, I don't think that your repeated issues on this wiki is justified and can be considered an honest mistake. -- Chenzw  Talk  03:14, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

For any admin reviewing this, here are some specifics. I only had to go back a week to find all these: there are undoubtedly others before that. I recommend looking through the history of this talk page to see other things that Ipadguy has been warned about.

  • restored warnings on User talk:94.12.81.251 that that user had removed, even though Ipadguy himself removes every message left on his own talk page
  • inappropriate warning on his talk page notice ("Warning, Do NOT edit this page unless you really, really, need too.")
  • overcategorizing many pages related to Apple Inc.

I didn't even try to analyze the edit warring complained about at User talk:94.12.81.251. --Auntof6 (talk) 22:59, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

There are many examples out there, but I'll add this revert to the mix. The IP user adds a period in the wrong spot creating a red link. So, Ipadguy just reverts it rather than making the logical fix. So quick to the trigger, so inappropriate in actions. I fully agree with this block as I brought up at Auntof6's talk page earlier today. I'll allow others to come along to review the block, though. Only (talk) 02:34, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to have the proper judgement/understanding of our rules to contribute here, despite already having contributed on EN before. 3 cases of severely assuming bad faith in less than half a day is ridiculous, and turns out that I am not the only one who takes issue with his approach to his user talk page.
Note to administrators: per en:WP:REMOVED, declined unblock requests regarding a currently active block may not be removed by the concerned user. Chenzw  Talk  03:14, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Endlessly reposting invalid warnings on my talk page[change source]

Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make helpful changes to Wikipedia. However, some of your changes, like those to "User talk:94.12.81.251‎", did not seem to be helpful and have been reverted or removed. If you want to try out changing Wikipedia to learn more about how it works, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 94.12.81.251 (talk) 23:00, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Deleting[change source]

I will restore your talk messages. Deleting your messages after reading them is seriously inconvenient to anyone. Please DO NOT restore the messages. PS: I have studied the EN wiki and trying to unblock multiple times will result on a talk page ban. PokestarFan (talk) 20:40, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

@PokestarFan: Please leave restoring another user's talk messages to either that user or the admins: although it makes things difficult, users are allowed to delete most things from their own talk pages. Also, it is up to the admins to decide whether to remove talk page access: it is not automatic, even after multiple unblock requests. --Auntof6 (talk) 21:03, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
And in addition to what Auntof6 said, if you've "studied the EN wiki", then you would know that users can blank their own talk pages: "Policy does not prohibit users, whether registered or unregistered, from removing comments from their own talk pages, although archiving is preferred. If a user removes material from their user page, it is normally taken to mean that the user has read and is aware of its contents." So, Ipadguy is well within his rights to remove comments. Do not restore them, PokestarFan. Only (talk) 21:21, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

I understand. Sorry @Ipadguy:.PokestarFan (talk) 21:44, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

RfD nomination of User:Ipadguy/topicons[change source]

An editor has requested deletion of User:Ipadguy/topicons, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2016/User:Ipadguy/topicons and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. Etamni | ✉   18:23, 23 January 2016 (UTC)