Jump to content

User talk:Kiko4564

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
CheckUser evidence has decided that this user account has or may be used against our rules.
It has been blocked indefinitely to prevent abuse.

Administrators: CheckUsers have access to private system information other administrators can't see due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy, and so must be consulted before this block can be removed.  -- Barras (talk) 15:59, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request to be unblocked.[change source]

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Kiko4564 (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)


Request reason:

I wish to be unblocked or have my block shortened to for example three months, as I was blocked indefinetly on enwiki and wish to improve my general track record on wikimedia foundation wikis by having a clean start by making good faith editing here on simplewiki. I also have never sockpuppeted since I ran the John Prescot account, and on this wiki I don't remember actually editing via that account, even though I did on enwiki. I also would like to add that here there are no publicly visible changes on that account on this particular wiki as can be seen here. If you decline this request, than please unblock the helpinghand as he has no connection with me. Also please apolgise to him on my behalf, thanks.

Decline reason:

When a checkuser places a block, there is good reason for a block. And, in any case, we do have a one strike rule that is often extended as a courtesy. As a checkuer even had to get involved in this case, following the one strike rule, I must decline. -- Gordonrox24 | Talk 05:44, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Kiko4564 (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)


Request reason:

The same reason as above, but however I do not believe a checkuser on this wiki actually used that power on this case, as the block reason cited my confession as opposed to logs accessed by a checkuser on this wiki.

Decline reason:

There is no support for an unblock so I'm declining this. -- PeterSymonds (talk) 22:05, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Kiko4564 (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)


Request reason:

I also would like to add that I have made some good faith changes on other WMF wiki's, for example commons and simple wiktionary and as above, checkuser evidence didn't seem to be involved here, it mentions my confession on an admin's talk page in the unblock reason. And I haven't socked on any wiki since the 31st of December with the John Prescot account, which I admit was completely wrong and immature, but I have moved on since. To add to my good changes on WMF wikis, I also made even more good changes on a non-WMF wiki, called wikiHow. Also, could you please tell me what bad changes I made here? If unblocked, I will make anti-vandalism edits here. Thanks.

Decline reason:

I've spoken with a local checkuser. I will say that evidence strongly suggests that the account has been abusive, and based on that, and historical crosswiki edits as mentioned above, the block is sustained. -- Jon@talk:~$ 17:29, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage[change source]

Just FYI, the user page of this user uses the wrong template. Can an admin please change it to {{sockpuppeteer}} and {{blocked user}} or something like that please? 92.26.48.248 (talk) 12:28, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template is fine as is. Only (talk) 12:37, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]