User talk:LaugherJ5 Roger dat

hi -- Kunjarpunch / [ t ] 02:42, 22 June 2021 (UTC) hello (uk 98.97 92.07. user[reply]

Sandbox[change source]

That picture is not President John Adams, lol. 50.30.176.23 (talk) 03:07, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IK -- Kunjarpunch / [ t ] 04:53, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Diff/7636177[change source]

1) Inappropriate edit summary. 2) Most retired people wouldn’t mind having some messages on their talk pages but not respond to them. 3) The content is not that bad there. Darubrub (Let me know) 23:51, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:71.92.236.107[change source]

Maybe consider denying recognition? --Ferien (talk) 16:05, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok -- Kunjarpunch / [ t ] 14:42, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what you are doing[change source]

With editing in userspaces of blocked users. I am not even sure if you are W:WP:GRAVEDANCING or just confused on how we handle blocked users differently. Darubrub (Let me know) 01:48, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was confused -- Kunjarpunch / [ t ] 01:50, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You did not explain your edit[change source]

Hi! If you feel that the Tommy Gulliksen article has a problem, then I suggest you take the problem to Talk:Tommy Gulliksen. Thanks 89.8.73.124 (talk) 08:04, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

they were kind of gaming, but it was not very simplified, I think that it was not vandalism -- Kunjarpunch / [ t ] 14:53, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for rollback[change source]

Hello. Just so you know for future, requests for rollback, and patroller, are not votes and will not have an effect on the administrator's final decision. Regards, --Ferien (talk) 16:10, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cuban art[change source]

Why did you remove all the artwork at Cuban art? 50.30.176.27 (talk) 16:47, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You did not explain your edit (your good-faith edit)[change source]

Hi! If you feel that the Cuban art article has a problem, then I suggest you take the problem to Talk:Cuban art. Thanks 89.8.165.19 (talk) 16:52, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reporting to VIP[change source]

Hello Kunjarpunch. Please only report to VIP if the user has

been warned enough to be blocked
been editing since those warnings

A lot of your reports recently have been not only stale, but also stale with few/no warnings to the user involved. Please only report ongoing vandalism to VIP, not users who finished editing hours ago, or users who received little to no warning. Per policy, admins cannot block IPs who stopped editing hours ago as it would not prevent any damage. Also, VIP is not for reporting issues that clearly are not vandalism.

For example, you reported 2407:7000:9D91:8591:658E:9300:E777:374C to VIP for "creating fishy pages". There were a couple of issues with this report: you had not warned the user at all and there was actually nothing wrong with the pages they had created. You hadn't requested any of them for deletion so those pages were obviously not bad enough for deletion in your eyes; why are you asking for a block?

In future, please be more careful when reporting to vandalism in progress. Thank you, --Ferien (talk) 08:10, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok -- Kunjarpunch / [ t ] 23:04, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppets[change source]

Hi, Laugher. Just so you know, you don't need to add sockpuppet templates or create sockpuppet categories. Sometimes the admins don't do that on purpose: they're not really needed, and it's something that should usually be left to the admins. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 02:25, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok LaugherJ5 Roger dat (talk) 15:37, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

my new sig is ~ Laugher^CUN - Talk - Contribs - 2024-04-17 14:27:51