User talk:LouisPhilippeCharlesNew

February 2016[change source]

You have been blocked indefinitely from changing Wikipedia in line with Wikipedia's blocking policy for sockpuppetry. If you think this block is unfair, you may ask to be unblocked by adding {{unblock|your reason here}} below. If you cannot do this or the reason is private, please send an e-mail to simple-admins-l@lists.wikimedia.org and an administrator will look at your reason and reply. You may want to read our guide to unblock requests before asking to be unblocked. Auntof6 (talk) 06:37, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

LouisPhilippeCharlesNew (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)

Request reason:

For the love of god. Considering this account was set up FOR ME by an administrator on the normal Wikipedia. This account actually has NOTHING to do with sockpuppetry. This is just completely absurd. People on here act like children. I was happily contributing away then I get an email saying this. What is wrong with people? Even then, in the unlikely event that this was a sockpuppet SURELY I would not have a name like LouisPhilippeCharles? That would make more sense? AGAIN. This account was set up by an ADMINISTRATOR by the name of User:Salvidrim!. Ask him if you wish. Some people need to grow up in my opinion. I have done nothing wrong? This is silly now. I am actually a person by the way. LouisPhilippeCharlesNew (talk) 11:23, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

That a user on the English Wikipedia created this account has no bearing on this project. Your original account, LouisPhilippeCharles, was—and still is—blocked on this project. So any attempt to circumvent that block here will be stopped. If you want to edit on this project, you need to request an unblock from your original account. It is not likely to be accepted since you evaded the block by editing from this account and, previously, from the account Simplegoose. -- Osiris (talk) 11:37, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BUT LISTEN TO ME. I DID NOT SET THIS ACCOUNT UP. It was SET UP FOR ME. Therefore it is NOT A SOCKPUPPET. LISTEN. Fool. I'm not a bad person for christ's sake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.24.42.140 (talk • contribs)

I didn't say you were. But if your account gets blocked, request that the block be removed. You didn't do that; you used this account to keep editing. It does not matter who created the account, especially not if it's a user from another project. Osiris (talk) 11:52, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

LouisPhilippeCharlesNew (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)

Request reason:

Again, I've done little to nothing wrong. This account was set up for me by an admin. I had no choice about the name. Unblock me. I'm a darn good editor. Some people really need to grow up and listen to others. LouisPhilippeCharlesNew (talk) 17:30, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your original account, User:LouisPhilippeCharles remains blocked, from 2011, for sockpuppetry. Using another account to edit, while your other account(s) is blocked, is considered ban evasion, and sockpuppetry, as it is still using an additional account to circumvent a ban. That is regardless of the content and intent of the edits, and is additionally regardless of who created the account. Request an unblock from your original account, addressing the original reason for you original block. However, I'm sorry to say, I would be unsure about the success of such a request, as Osiris mentioned. --George (Talk · Contribs · CentralAuth · Log) 12:07, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly.[change source]

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

LouisPhilippeCharlesNew (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)

Request reason:

Ok I remembered the password literally 5 minutes ago. Alas, I say again I've not actually done anything wrong. HOWEVER I DO sincerely apologise for being snappy/short with other users. It's just that I feel that nobody is listening or understanding, or even pretending to do so. As I've said I'm a darn good editor and relish the opportunity to continue to do so. I have several pages in mind. Pleaseeeeee. LouisPhilippeCharlesNew (talk) 21:24, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Ok if you remember the password to that account now, go ahead and request there. -- DJSasso (talk) 12:05, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

LouisPhilippeCharlesNew (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)

Request reason:

No User:Djsasso you've misunderstood. The original account is locked and the administrator just merged this account with that one (if that makes sense) And even then I can't edit my own talkpage on the normal Wikipedia to even conbsider asking to be unblocked. That is my point. Even then I've actually done little, to nothing wrong on SimpleWikipedia in all fairness. Please give me some good news. LouisPhilippeCharlesNew (talk) 18:13, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Please see my input below, then create a new unblock request. -- Chenzw Talk 08:53, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to reply to this request because I did the original block. I just want to say that if you are blocked on another Wikipedia, including English Wikipedia (is that what you mean by "normal Wikipedia"?), we can't help you with that here. I also don't know what you mean by accounts getting merged, because I don't think that's possible. --Auntof6 (talk) 18:30, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes User:Auntof6 that's what I mean by normal Wikipedia (the main English Wikipedia) Annnnnnnd ages and ages ago my account that was called LouisPhilippeCharles was blocked. I forget who by and as a result I've been begging pretty much ever since to no avail. Anyway I did contact one admin and he merged the talk history of LouisPhilippeCharles and moved it to LouisPhilippeCharlesNew. If that makes any sense? The reason I ask to be unblocked on the "Simple Wiki" is that I have little to no interest in editing the main main Wikipedia. I cannot deal with the petulance and arrogance of some users there.

That makes sense, but, as others have tried to tell you, you should be requesting this from your primary account, not from this one. Didn't you say you have now remembered the password to that one? --Auntof6 (talk) 18:58, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure why this is constantly being debated on, but LouisPhilippeCharlesNew (this account) is indeed the oldest account which the editor can still login to. Globally locked accounts cannot be logged into by users, so it is impossible to request for an unblock there (or even use Special:Emailuser).

I am willing to consider your unblock request, but you have to tell us more about your previous editing behaviour which led to your block, why you want to be unblocked, and how you are going to make changes so that the previous incidents will not happen again on this wiki. Chenzw Talk 08:53, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I never noticed it was globally locked. If its globally locked then I will reject it outright then unless I hear from stewards. -DJSasso (talk) 16:18, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging User:M7, who performed the lock in 2010. Chenzw Talk 16:31, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per previous mentions made by various stewards ([1], [2], [3], [4]), and with the understanding that stewards generally do not intervene in local wikis' affairs, I take it to be such that local wikis still exercise their judgement as to whether to allow individual editors to edit (or remain blocked), regardless of global account state. Also, I find it extremely strange that User:LouisPhilippeCharles was locally blocked 2 months after the lock. Chenzw Talk 16:56, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
What I am saying is not new to you, but you are not allowed to edit at all if you are currently blocked on this wiki. It doesn't matter whether you are editing as an anonymous or registered user, or if you think the original block was unfair. An opportunity was given to you to appeal the block here, but you have clearly decided not to. Since you can't be bothered to respect the process, neither can I be bothered to spend time reviewing your case in detail. Chenzw Talk 01:46, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Erm[change source]

User:Chenzw, You're not listening. I cannot edit my talk page in order to ask for help. That is the point. Also your attitude of "neither can I be bothered to spend time reviewing your case in detail." is in no way fair or mature to be honest. I have done nothing wrong on here. For the love of god. 10:08, 16 April 2016 (UTC).

Perhaps I wasn't so clear in the above paragraph. You, as a person, are not allowed to edit this wiki at all if you are under a block. It does not matter whether you logout to edit anonymously, or if you think that the original block was unjustified. Further appeals should go to simple-admins-l@lists.wikimedia.org. Chenzw Talk 10:51, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]